Channel
@panel_giveaway
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
120subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1003871223058 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @panel_giveaway |
| Created | Between 1 February 2026 and 30 June 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 9 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 15 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 15 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/panel_giveaway |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 15 Aug 2026, 08:25 | 120 | -1 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 03:47 | 121 | no change |
| 8 Aug 2026, 20:22 | 121 | +1 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 09:00 | 120 | first reading |
18 posts held, back to 31 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 4 of 18 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 8 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 18 (31 July 2026 – 8 August 2026) |
| Views total | 304 |
| Reactions total | 7 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 9 Aug 2026, 03:47 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
7 reactions across 4 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 57.1% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 4 | 57.1% | |
| 👍 | 2 | 28.6% | |
| 🔥 | 1 | 14.3% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 4 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 7reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 31 July 2026 to 8 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Diverting to grace and stuffs Well, If I had taken any decision that makes you dislike or make me offend you I sincerely apologize, Back on my stuffs now, BarryGpt will be out soonest Thank you all for the support. Support us : @Lord_Barry_Channel - BARRY
This user @Invalid_being has been reported severally to be a scammer, a nudist and a person under the influence of drugs. Several report of scams from @Invalid_being has been reported to the telegram authorities, and she has been declared wanted. She advertise ban methods which you all wants to dm her to purchase, she doesn't have any method to offer, you will only get scammed if you send any money to her. Report …
Well, You all so called idolized qwin grace has just been fucked by Almighty Lord Barry Like I said, I go by action ion do noise After all being said Her next Login won't be available. - BARRY
Sas my subscribers dey laugh me cuz I dey kneel down 😭😭 Oya normally let's do giveaway 12+ reactions
❤1
Active for panel giveaway?? Spam reactions unlimited panel
❤2👍2
Y'all should click my referral links guys more love 💕😘 https://t.me/ayoxmeta_bot?start=ref_8747159349 Once you have claim your free 2gb panel dm @darkisevil_supportbot For reward
𝗙𝗼𝗿 𝘀𝗮𝗹𝗲 𝗚𝗼𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝗰𝗵𝗲𝗮𝗽 𝗻𝗼𝘄 𝗗𝗺 @Barrydee_Lordbot 𝘁𝗼 𝗯𝘂𝘆
𝗦𝗰𝗼𝗽𝗲 𝘀𝗵𝗮 𝘄𝗲𝗹𝗹, 1𝗸 𝗦𝘂𝗯𝘀 𝗰𝗵𝗮𝗻𝗻𝗲𝗹 𝗳𝗼𝗿 𝘀𝗮𝗹𝗲 𝗗𝗺 @Barrydee_Lordbot 𝘁𝗼 𝗽𝘂𝗿𝗰𝗵𝗮𝘀𝗲 𝗔𝗰𝘁𝗶𝘃𝗲 𝗮𝘀𝗳, 𝘄𝗶𝘁𝗵 10 𝘀𝘁𝗮𝗿 𝗯𝗮𝗹𝗮𝗻𝗰𝗲
𝗪𝗵𝗮𝘁 𝘀𝗵𝗼𝘂𝗹𝗱 𝗶 𝗰𝗿𝗲𝗮𝘁𝗲 𝗳𝗼𝗿 𝘆'𝗮𝗹𝗹?
The shares total 169%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Posted without readable text
𝗧𝗼𝗻𝗶𝗴𝗵𝘁 𝗴𝗶𝘃𝗲𝗮𝘄𝗮𝘆 𝘄𝗶𝗹𝗹 𝗯𝗲 𝗱𝗼𝗻𝗲 𝗶𝗻 𝗼𝘂𝗿 𝘄𝗵𝗮𝘁𝘀𝗮𝗽𝗽 𝗰𝗵𝗮𝗻𝗻𝗲𝗹 𝗮𝗻𝗱 𝗻𝗼𝘁 𝗼𝗻 𝘁𝗲𝗹𝗲𝗴𝗿𝗮𝗺 𝗘𝗶𝘁𝗵𝗲𝗿 𝘀𝘁𝗮𝗿𝘀 𝗴𝗶𝘃𝗲𝗮𝘄𝗮𝘆 𝗼𝗿 𝗽𝗮𝗻𝗲𝗹 𝗼𝗿 𝗰𝗮𝘀𝗵 𝗔𝗹𝗹 𝗱𝗲𝗽𝗲𝗻𝗱𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝗼𝗻 𝘆𝗼𝘂𝗿 𝗿𝗲𝗮𝗰𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻𝘀 𝗶𝗻 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝘄𝗵𝗮𝘁𝘀𝗮𝗽𝗽 𝗰𝗵𝗮𝗻𝗻𝗲𝗹 𝗝𝗼𝗶𝗻 𝗻𝗼𝘄 : https://whatsapp.com/channel/0029Vb9MVEhJ3jv8XLVvW82G
🤡 ZAYDEN LEAKED FILES BOT 📦 STOP PAYING FOR FILES THAT SHOULD BE FREE. 📦 You know that frustration when you're searching everywhere for a file, script, or base — and everyone wants money before they release it? 👎 Not anymore. We fixed that. 🚀 Introducing a bot loaded with FREE files, scripts, and bases — all organized, all accessible, zero stress. No "premium only" trap, no hidden fees. Here's how it works: ✅ J…
Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @panel_giveaway. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
𝗪𝗵𝗮𝘁 𝘀𝗵𝗼𝘂𝗹𝗱 𝗶 𝗰𝗿𝗲𝗮𝘁𝗲 𝗳𝗼𝗿 𝘆'𝗮𝗹𝗹?
The shares total 169%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 31 July 2026 to 8 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank — 291,754 of 1,480,688entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Panel Giveaway” (@panel_giveaway), 120 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/panel_giveaway.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.