Channel
@painzone01
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
847subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002938794959 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @painzone01 |
| Description | Боль толпы = прибыль сильных |
| Created | Between 1 August 2025 and 6 October 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 8 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/painzone01 |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 8 Aug 2026, 01:19 | 847 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 17:22 | 847 | first reading |
18 posts held, back to 6 October 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 18 posts for this entry, the most recent from 9 November 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
633 reactions across 18 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 28.8% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5958818178858490899 | 182 | 28.8% | |
| custom 5958506183844174383 | 128 | 20.2% | |
| custom 5965437767138678555 | 123 | 19.4% | |
| custom 5965460839702993919 | 86 | 13.6% | |
| custom 5965250721312938108 | 64 | 10.1% | |
| custom 5956525379286998403 | 42 | 6.64% | |
| custom 5958794079796993578 | 8 | 1.26% |
Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 633reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 6 October 2025 to 9 November 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Welcome to PainZone LABS 🧪 Запуски. Упаковка. Маркет-мейкинг. От мемки до фундамента. Ты приносишь идею и стейблы — мы делаем продукт и запускаем (полностью упаковав) Нет идеи? Ничего страшного, мы поможем! Обратная связь в чате канала.
custom 596543776713867855535custom 595881817885849089916custom 596525072131293810810custom 59654608397029939197
Всем кто дал обратку насчет темы пресейлы, я все вижу. Спасибо за обратку. Много было сообщений и всем физически не смог ответить. Надеюсь на ваше понимание ✊🏼 Тема на стадии рассмотрения. Если команда, которая хочет запуск сделать даст в итоге такую возможность, то залетим. Буду на связи на счет той темки 🐂
custom 595881817885849089938custom 596525072131293810820custom 596546083970299391910custom 59654377671386785557
#понимание
custom 595850618384417438311custom 59588181788584908997custom 59565253792869984035
Сегодня!
custom 595850618384417438311custom 59588181788584908998custom 59654608397029939195
Вчера!
custom 595881817885849089910custom 59585061838441743835custom 59654608397029939194
1 график бтс к золоту (+8%) 2 график золото к юсдт (-14% с хая) золото потеряло $1.8т за сутки в то время как бтс к золоту вырос на 8% за сутки золото взял на бинанс спот паксг, там был хороший аномальный всплеск. как итог, возможно мы уже наблюдаем хорошую коррекцию по золоту и начало перелива в бтс. это то, что нам сейчас и правда нужно увидеть. пост про золотую лихорадку.
custom 596543776713867855512custom 59652507213129381085custom 59654608397029939195
золотая лихорадка защитный актив защитным активом , но и честь тайминг надо знать. когда со всех медиа трубят «очереди на золото», «золото бьет хай за хаем», «лучший актив» нужно смотреть на график и задаваться вопросом «а почему все эти новости пошли только сейчас, хотя золото растет уже год?» все верно, нужна смена рук перед хорошей коррекцией. именно смены рук и коррекции мы и ждём.
custom 596543776713867855511custom 59565253792869984038custom 59585061838441743835
$ETH Пробили — закрепились — почти дошли до зоны (4400$) и показали +5.5% Но пока глобально не удается закрепится там 🥵 Без этого закрепа мы будем постоянно падать вниз
custom 595881817885849089915custom 595850618384417438310
$ETH Внимательно следим за уровнем 4067$ 😍 Лишь при условии возврата (с закрепом) выше 4067$ мы покажем глобальную заинтересованность крупняка толкать эфир к 4400-4600$ 🐂 Все, что ниже уровня — шортовая зона 🥵
custom 595881817885849089925custom 59652507213129381088custom 59654608397029939196custom 59565253792869984035custom 59654377671386785552
Новая история в которой я буду принимать участие с хорошими аналитиками, которых я знаю достаточно давно. Да будет польза и много хороших моментов @archfund
custom 596543776713867855526custom 595881817885849089910custom 59654608397029939196
Кстати, перед каждой бычкой/альтсезоном такой вынос был классикой. Надеюсь это начало нового мега сезона 👊
custom 595850618384417438333custom 596525072131293810817custom 596546083970299391910custom 59565253792869984032
Video, posted without a caption
custom 59565253792869984037custom 59585061838441743833custom 59587940797969935782
Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @painzone01. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Pain Zone” (@painzone01), 847 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/painzone01.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.