Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

๐–ˆ๐–Š๐–—๐–Ž๐–™๐–†

@painfullyv

On this record: Growth ยท Engagement ยท Reactions ยท Posts ยท Citations ยท Cite this entry

872subscribers

-7 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register ยท movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001522202869
TypeChannel
Username@painfullyv
CreatedBetween 1 August 2021 and 28 February 2023โ€” estimated from Telegramโ€™s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 13 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/painfullyv

Growth

872879875.57 August 2026 โ€” 879 subscribers7 August 2026 โ€” 879 subscribers13 August 2026 โ€” 872 subscribers7 August 202613 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 6 days, net -7. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between โ€” snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean โ€œno change observedโ€, never โ€œinterpolatedโ€. The vertical axis spans 871โ€“880 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log โ€” every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
13 Aug 2026, 03:59872-7
7 Aug 2026, 01:01879no change
7 Aug 2026, 00:53879first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 4 December 2025 โ€” the reader has not yet reached the start of this channelโ€™s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegramโ€™s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR ยท 30 days
7.22%
avg views รท 872 subscribers
Avg views / post
63.0
1 post measured
Reaction rate
โ€”
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
1
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) รท viewsโ€” note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegramโ€™s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days ยท latest post in window 16 July 2026
Posts held20 (4 December 2025 โ€“ 16 July 2026)
Views total63
Reactions totalโ€”
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface โ€” not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Aug 2026, 01:01 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than โ€œcorrectingโ€ the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form โ€” 8.12K, 3.7M โ€” so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded โ€” read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

51 reactions across 12 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 39.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
๐Ÿ’ฏ2039.2%
๐Ÿ’”1325.5%
๐Ÿฅฐ917.6%
๐Ÿ˜‡611.8%
๐Ÿ˜ญ23.92%
๐Ÿ’Š11.96%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities โ€” ๐Ÿ™ is thanks in one channel and mourning in another โ€” so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one โ€” 4.34K, 1.2M โ€” so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 12 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegramโ€™s own count on each post โ€” not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above โ€” those same posts carry 51reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by โ€œa reaction total printed elsewhere on the pageโ€.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 4 December 2025 to 16 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

16 Jul 2026, 11:51 UTC63 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

RM60.00 ncpm @lopefvck .

Signed ๐ยด๐š… ' ๐Ÿšฉ

24 Jun 2026, 22:39 UTC134 views3 reactionsread 7 August 2026

cinta membuatkan kita memilih seseorang, tetapi sayang membuatkan kita tetap bertahan dan menjaga pilihan itu.

๐Ÿ’ฏ3

Signed ๐ยด๐š… ' ๐Ÿšฉ

19 May 2026, 17:15 UTC237 views5 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Kalau dah sayang, hati ini bukan sekadar memilih untuk tinggal, tapi sudah terbiasa bertahan walaupun berkali-kali terluka. Awak boleh sakiti saya berulang kali, tapi entah kenapa, saya masih tetap di siniโ€”bukan sebab saya tak sakit, tapi sebab perasaan ini terlalu dalam untuk dipadamkan begitu saja. Saya sendiri kadang-kadang tak faham kenapa saya masih kuat untuk orang yang sama, yang sama-sama pernah buat saya menโ€ฆ

๐Ÿ’”5

Signed ๐ยด๐š… ' ๐Ÿšฉ

9 May 2026, 04:14 UTC228 viewsread 7 August 2026

kerna aku habiskan cinta ini hanya untuk mu

Signed ๐ยด๐š… ' ๐Ÿšฉ

28 Apr 2026, 18:54 UTC268 views5 reactionsread 7 August 2026

terlalu mencintaimu sehingga engkau ingin pergi aku terlalu merayu rayu agar kita masih bersatu.

๐Ÿ’”3๐Ÿ˜ญ2

Signed ๐ยด๐š… ' ๐Ÿšฉ

13 Apr 2026, 14:53 UTC316 views3 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Sejak kita tak bersama, aku banyak belajar hargai orang yang hargai kita. Aku jadi lebih berhati-hati kenal lelaki, sebab ramai yang tak serius. Sekarang aku lebih fokus kerja, family, dan diri sendiri. Aku dah berubah, tak macam dulu. Tapi satu je tak berubah aku masih rindu kau, dan aku tak pernah lupakan kau.

๐Ÿฅฐ3

Signed ๐ยด๐š… ' ๐Ÿšฉ

8 Apr 2026, 13:06 UTC322 views3 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Aku tak pernah benci kau, cuma kau akan berada di ingatan ku buat selama lamanya .

๐Ÿ’ฏ2๐Ÿ’Š1

Signed ๐ยด๐š… ' ๐Ÿšฉ

23 Feb 2026, 16:42 UTCviews โ€”

๐–ˆ๐–Š๐–—๐–Ž๐–™๐–† pinned ยซneed admin @painfullyv admin quotes โœ“ just huruf semua kecil โœ“ sad qoutes n another โœ“ noktah di ayat terakhir (.) โœ“ boy/girl accepted โœ“ interested ? pm @Nanat_assistantBotยป

23 Feb 2026, 16:38 UTC410 viewsread 7 August 2026

awak , saya nak cakap sikit saya sayang awak tau sangat sangat . awak jangan la abaikan saya . saya rindu awak sebenarnya tapi tahu kita jarang jumpa tapi kalau kita dapat alhamdulillah satu rezeki . harap sangat sangat kita dipermudahkan untuk jumpa .

Signed Danielle.

19 Feb 2026, 16:43 UTC377 viewsread 7 August 2026

Never love a man more than you love YOURSELF. It will destroy you .

Signed Danielle.

18 Feb 2026, 18:28 UTC372 viewsread 7 August 2026

kita berharga dimata yang tepat .

Signed ๐ยด๐š… ' ๐Ÿšฉ

13 Feb 2026, 16:36 UTC380 viewsread 7 August 2026

We need happy with love not sad with love !

Signed ๐ยด๐š… ' ๐Ÿšฉ

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @painfullyv. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked โ‰ˆ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it โ€” t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so โ‰ˆ1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank โ€” 778,774 of 1,183,361entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below โ€” republished posts weigh more than named mentions โ€” and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channelโ€™s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page โ€” a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 4 registered channels โ€” every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched โ€” that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting todayโ€™s namer to yesterdayโ€™s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason โ€” naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides โ€” the โ€œNamed by N registered channelsโ€ figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 โ€” this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

โ€œ๐–ˆ๐–Š๐–—๐–Ž๐–™๐–†โ€ (@painfullyv), 872 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/painfullyv.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV ยท JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.