Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

@paibang

@paibang

3 usernames

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry

73subscribers

-1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002030682783
TypeChannel
Usernames@cj444 @fulei1 @paibang
CreatedBetween 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded9 August 2026
Last confirmed live10 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged2 times, most recently 10 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/paibang

Growth

737473.57 August 2026 — 74 subscribers7 August 2026 — 74 subscribers9 August 2026 — 74 subscribers9 August 2026 — 73 subscribers7 August 20269 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 2 days, net -1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 73–74 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
9 Aug 2026, 21:4673-1
9 Aug 2026, 21:4674no change
7 Aug 2026, 13:1274no change
7 Aug 2026, 12:4174first reading

Engagement

17 posts held, back to 2 January 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 3 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 17 posts for this entry, the most recent from 23 February 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

7 reactions across 5 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 71.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
571.4%
👍228.6%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 9 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 7reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 2 January 2025 to 23 February 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

17 Feb 2026, 02:38 UTC256 viewsread 9 August 2026
Photo

新春佳节,祝各位老板马年吉祥,一马当先~

13 Sept 2025, 14:25 UTC823 views1 reactionsread 9 August 2026

@xubro 许兄弟 @aobro 奥兄弟 @xqbro 小七兄弟 @xwbro 小五兄弟

1

26 Aug 2025, 10:50 UTC≈1,250 views0 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

@YY567 已经160T📱 @bf123 暴富123有没有老板喜欢 只需104T📱 https://fragment.com/username/bf123

26 Aug 2025, 03:40 UTC687 views2 reactionsread 9 August 2026

你们最喜欢看得,开心吧 帮朋友曝光一个老外骗子 @kukkk @kkkok @amaaa @cccsc @ssssk @xjxxx @cxccc 骗子得id 朋友被骗并不是啥丢人得事,因为在平静得生活,才会放松警惕。 我们好多词买得都是老外得,老外得词,都很贵,这也就导致,些许词价格极速上涨,我们去采购避免不了,他们骗我们中国人,希望咱们中国人团结起来,和骗子势不两立。 被骗只会我们更强大。好词为啥那么贵,老外骗子一大堆。现在老外让国人竞拍,价高得,这就导致一个id,转移频道权都是几百u,这样看来我nft算是白菜价 欢迎私聊 @fulei 给你最优质得服务,最便宜得价格

👍2

26 Jul 2025, 18:59 UTC959 views0 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

很久没发交易图了!感谢老板们的支持!

26 Feb 2025, 19:12 UTC≈1,940 views2 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

典藏礼物: 能够佩戴在小表情处,还有编码弹窗,独特的编码寓意。(详情查看上图) 收到后,等待14天就能上传到TON链。 在下个月之内,将开放官网拍卖场。与 +888 NFT用户名 同款,作为虚拟资产NFT. 频道也可以使用礼物 等到官方做好生态会有更多的新功能并且增加账号权重 更不容易封账号 现在入手不妨是一个最好的时机,当做一场投资。 选品频道: @liwuj

2

9 Feb 2025, 10:55 UTC≈1,870 viewsread 9 August 2026

为节省各位选购时间 建立NFT选购货表 @huobiao

Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @paibang. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 341,520 of 1,189,255entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“@paibang” (@paibang), 73 subscribers as measured 9 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/paibang.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.