Channel
@paharHighRisk
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
698subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1003099809349 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @paharHighRisk |
| Description | Что посеешь, то и пожнешь @pahar_d |
| Created | Between 1 September 2025 and 31 October 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 8 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/paharHighRisk |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 8 Aug 2026, 02:19 | 698 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 14:18 | 698 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 11 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 15 of 16 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (11 June 2026 – 7 August 2026) |
| Views total | 6,602 |
| Reactions total | 126 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 8 Aug 2026, 02:19 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
154 reactions across 19 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 42.9% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5341790081759855013 | 66 | 42.9% | |
| custom 5406649413688904810 | 31 | 20.1% | |
| custom 5274132711781450780 | 30 | 19.5% | |
| custom 5343542832143549720 | 10 | 6.49% | |
| custom 5273900057697992713 | 7 | 4.55% | |
| custom 5449543307908655135 | 7 | 4.55% | |
| custom 5449421378082088695 | 3 | 1.95% |
Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 154reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 11 June 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Крупные QR для ваших ГУ Ребята ГУшники , ваш выход ставка 10% от 10к С вас умение работать и забирать чеки 10-20к, а с меня крупные QR коды 🖱 @pahar_d
custom 54495433079086551353custom 52741327117814507801custom 54494213780820886951
Что за трафик? Обменка? Залетали треугольники? Принимаешь грязь? Пачками ко мне в ЛС залетают подобные вопросы. Ну что ж, пришло время рассказать что я обрабатываю… и это всеми любимые колл.. контрагенты! Это не просто контрагенты, а их общий пул, то есть свободные контры или те , что уперлись в лимиты к уже привязанным реквизитам. Теперь представь, что ты обрабатываешь огромное количество ХЧ , а это ВИП клиенты.…
custom 54495433079086551354custom 54494213780820886952
Тутор: как зарабатывать 1к в минуту 1 Этап: берем реквизит Т-банка 2 Этап: подключаемся на самую лучшую площадку с чистейшим трафиком и жирнющими ХЧ @pahar_d 3 Этап: включаем трафик Как итог: -450к за 5 платежей -Интервал между 1 и 5 сделкой = 38 мин -450.000 х 0.08 = 36000/38=948₽/мин😵 Фермеры и прочие любители ХЧ, у меня к вам вопрос: почему вы еще не у нас?
custom 52741327117814507804custom 53417900817598550132
Всем привет. Данный канал перешел мне по наследству. ***САМ ЛИЧНО, я к данной тематике отношения не имею) Здесь я буду рассказывать про своего друга))) Был в гостях у него сегодня, хз зачем ему столько телефонов, там какие то банковские приложения еще, по 4 шт на каждом… Скоро запускаю реалити моего друга, где покажу как мой друг)) запускает свою небольшую ферму Подготовка кабинетов, настройка, отчетность по при…
Залив конечно круто, но… Гибкие команды, которые круто ловят тенденции и умеют перестраиваться уже наколотили капитал и начали подготавливать свои Сани к предстоящей Зиме. Ведь не за горами тот момент когда гайки начнут закручивать и работать станет сложнее, паблик методы окончательно загнутся. К этому надо быть готовым, ведь так происходит из года в год… -Воздуха погонял, а че делать не рассказал…Че теперь, дружн…
custom 54066494136889048102
1.178.358₽ или 95.000₽ выручки с одного Т-банка Откатка в лям уже обыденность, больше выкладывать не буду, теперь переходим к новому этапу. 💃5кк soon…
custom 53417900817598550135
14/20, доброй ночи, коллеги😙 завтра уверенно перешагнем отметку в 1кк…
custom 52741327117814507803
Всем продуктивной недели🤩 7 платежей , средний чек 67к, добавить больше нечего… Если хочешь так же - смотри пост выше.
custom 54066494136889048104custom 52741327117814507801
Как-то слабовато ,братцы.На общее сливать не буду. Сделаем чуть иначе: с тебя кодовая фраза «ТИНЬ» мне в ЛС (@pahar_d), с меня – инфа как отработать Т-Банк в 1кк. Делюсь БЕСПЛАТНО, поэтому если видишь пост - пиши 💬
custom 52741327117814507806custom 53417900817598550134custom 54066494136889048102
Я могу кидать такие результаты пачками💃 Но гораздо приятнее довести до них кого нибудь из вас. ♥️- Метод нужен?
custom 534179008175985501319custom 52741327117814507804custom 53435428321435497204
💳Яндекс приостановил верификацию, ребята ГУшники ищите альтернативные методы 🛒 WB банк не живет ни в ферму ни в агроферму, поэтому воздержитесь от работы с ним 💳УралСиб нестабилен , требуется откатка в несколько дней. При наличие потока дешевого материала - хороший вариант 💳Стабильно катается мной и моими трейдами в 1кк+ , самый легкий метод для раскачки депозита. Работать можно как в круг так и в нал , а после сн…
custom 54066494136889048104custom 52741327117814507802custom 53417900817598550132custom 53435428321435497201
Горячо приветствую вновь прибывших! На связи Пахарь. За время существования канала я написал достаточно полезных и ценных постов, поэтому, если ты здесь недавно, ознакомься - тык🖱 Буду честен: у меня нет цели посадить вас на рефку и тянуть деньги. Нет. Канал как инструмент, который поможет нам заработать котлету 💵
custom 52741327117814507805custom 53417900817598550134custom 52739000576979927132
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @paharHighRisk. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 465,645 of 1,169,250entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 7 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Пахарь и плоды транзакций” (@paharHighRisk), 698 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/paharHighRisk.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.