Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for ПАЦАНКИ 10 | СЛИВА

Channel

ПАЦАНКИ 10 | СЛИВА

@pacankispoiler

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

39,879subscribers

-425 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001583693957
TypeChannel
Username@pacankispoiler
Created10 July 2021measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live17 August 2026
Measurements held11
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 17 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/pacankispoiler

Growth

39,87940,30440,091.57 August 2026 — 40,304 subscribers7 August 2026 — 40,304 subscribers8 August 2026 — 40,265 subscribers8 August 2026 — 40,232 subscribers10 August 2026 — 40,188 subscribers11 August 2026 — 40,151 subscribers12 August 2026 — 40,125 subscribers13 August 2026 — 40,081 subscribers14 August 2026 — 40,018 subscribers16 August 2026 — 39,940 subscribers17 August 2026 — 39,879 subscribers7 August 202617 August 2026
11 measurements spanning 10 days, net -425. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 39,815–40,368 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
17 Aug 2026, 14:5939,879-61
16 Aug 2026, 08:3439,940-78
14 Aug 2026, 16:2440,018-63
13 Aug 2026, 08:5840,081-44
12 Aug 2026, 05:3540,125-26
11 Aug 2026, 03:5140,151-37
10 Aug 2026, 03:1140,188-44
8 Aug 2026, 23:5740,232-33
8 Aug 2026, 02:1540,265-39
7 Aug 2026, 08:0040,304no change
7 Aug 2026, 07:5540,304first reading

Engagement

22 posts held, back to 4 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 26 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
19.6%
avg views ÷ 39,879 subscribers
Avg views / post
7,830
22 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.93%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
22
of 22 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 16 August 2026
Posts held22 (4 August 202616 August 2026)
Views total172,180
Reactions total5,045
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken17 Aug 2026, 12:14 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
17m 13s
Average length
1m 09s

Measured directly from 15 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

5,045 reactions across 22 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 67.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
3,42767.9%
❤‍🔥82516.4%
🔥2374.70%
🤡1633.23%
🤮1422.81%
😍911.80%
👍881.74%
💩490.971%
😱180.357%
😭50.099%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 22 of the 22 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 5,045reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 22 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 16 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

16 Aug 2026, 20:42 UTC≈4,240 views116 reactionsread 17 August 2026
Photo

🥳 Ольга Кравцова чиста уже как 9 месяцев "Сегодня 9 месяцев моей чистоты 🤲🏻🤍 Изменив состояние и мышление из которого я живу, я не прилагаю усилий для того, чтоб оставаться чистой. Изменив состояние и мышление, я вошла в дисциплину без борьбы, мне не составляет трудности считать КБЖУ и прогрессировать в спорте. Изменив состояние и мышление, я через страх иду в свой творческий путь и заявляю о себе. Через очень бол

🔥7323💩9❤‍🔥8👍1🤡1🤮1

16 Aug 2026, 17:45 UTC≈4,980 views135 reactionsread 17 August 2026
Video

😉 Светлана Токарова в новом завирусившимся тренде Как вам новые образы девушек?👇🏻 ПАЦАНКИ | СЛИВА

112❤‍🔥9🤡5🔥3🤮3💩2😍1

16 Aug 2026, 14:28 UTC≈5,530 views151 reactionsread 17 August 2026
Video

🤯 Шок правда про реалити шоу - "Пацанки" Мнение👇🏻 ПАЦАНКИ | СЛИВА

131❤‍🔥14🔥5😍1

15 Aug 2026, 13:38 UTC≈6,450 views398 reactionsread 17 August 2026
Photo

🫢 Рэп - исполнитель "Mayot" выложил у себя в истории танец Адель Шайбаковой Что думаете?👇🏻 ПАЦАНКИ | СЛИВА

289👍47❤‍🔥35🔥13🤡9😱5

14 Aug 2026, 19:25 UTC≈6,880 views113 reactionsread 17 August 2026
Video

🤭 Продолжение интервью с Яной Лукьяновой Что думаете?👇🏻 ПАЦАНКИ | СЛИВА

89🤡16🔥5❤‍🔥3

14 Aug 2026, 17:40 UTC≈6,680 views286 reactionsread 17 August 2026
Photo

🤗 Елизавета Андрющенко делиться снимками со своего отдыха в Москве Как проводите последние недели августа?👇🏻 ПАЦАНКИ | СЛИВА

223❤‍🔥50😍12🤡1

14 Aug 2026, 14:30 UTC≈6,990 views437 reactionsread 17 August 2026
Photo

😂 Кира Медведева поделилась снимками с пародиями на популярные мемы Как вам? Похоже?👇🏻 ПАЦАНКИ | СЛИВА

❤‍🔥279113😍23🔥13👍6🤡3

13 Aug 2026, 13:48 UTC≈6,670 views480 reactionsread 16 August 2026
Photo

💪🏻 Людмила Чиркова поделилась результатом своего похудения Сильно изменилась? 👇🏻 ПАЦАНКИ | СЛИВА

340❤‍🔥67😍38👍18🔥8😱6🤮3

12 Aug 2026, 14:30 UTC≈7,590 views259 reactionsread 16 August 2026
Photo

🥳 Сегодня свой день рождения празднует великолепная - Юлия Кириллова С днём рождения! Пусть жизнь будет яркой и красочной! Желаем невероятных успехов и море позитивных эмоций! ❤️ - Поздравляем! ПАЦАНКИ | СЛИВА

230❤‍🔥25🤡3👍1

9 Aug 2026, 07:49 UTC≈11,200 views333 reactionsread 16 August 2026
Photo

🌴 Очаровательная Наталья Гончарова поделилась кадрами с отдыха в Дубае Как вам? 👇🏻 ПАЦАНКИ | СЛИВА

210🤮70🔥25❤‍🔥9🤡8😍8😭2😱1

7 Aug 2026, 18:34 UTC≈10,800 views213 reactionsread 14 August 2026
Video

🤭 Анна Горохова и чёртовы рилсы Как вам закадровый контент?👇🏻 ПАЦАНКИ | СЛИВА

154❤‍🔥32🤡21👍3🔥3

7 Aug 2026, 15:45 UTC≈9,110 views160 reactionsread 14 August 2026
Video

🤫 Людмила Чиркова (Люда Лив) на интервью о новом этапе своей жизни в проекте "Пацанки" Что думаете?👇🏻 ПАЦАНКИ | СЛИВА

135❤‍🔥17🔥5🤮2🤡1

Showing the 12 most recent of 22 posts we hold for @pacankispoiler. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 376,165 of 1,481,502entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Пацанки Подслушано
@new_pacanki · 142,219
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 44 here — alongside 43 others — read 13 August 2026
Телеканал ПЯТНИЦА!
@fridaytv · 355,144
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 67 here — alongside 66 others — read 10 August 2026
ВСЕ РЕАЛИТИ
@vsereality · 119,652
Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 14 August 2026
НЕКИЙ КАНАЛ🎬
@kanalnekiy · 182,263
Telegram ranks this channel #40 of 66 here — alongside 65 others — read 12 August 2026

This channel appears in 4 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“ПАЦАНКИ 10 | СЛИВА” (@pacankispoiler), 39,879 subscribers as measured 17 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/pacankispoiler.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.