Posted without readable text
custom 52694355551579080345

Channel
@pablo_ngb
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
256subscribers
+1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1003213771191 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @pablo_ngb |
| Description | Личный блог @pablongb. Ищу и обозреваю интересные проекты в TON/Telegram Создатель @ngb_ton |
| Created | Between 1 October 2025 and 31 December 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 8 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| On Telegram | t.me/pablo_ngb |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 8 Aug 2026, 09:17 | 256 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 20:35 | 256 | +1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 17:48 | 255 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 28 March 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 14 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
292 reactions across 20 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 21.6% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5936138290519349485 | 63 | 21.6% | |
| custom 5424972470023104089 | 53 | 18.2% | |
| custom 5449505950283078474 | 49 | 16.8% | |
| custom 5443146426567634712 | 39 | 13.4% | |
| custom 5350291836378307462 | 30 | 10.3% | |
| custom 5258278278094924177 | 25 | 8.56% | |
| custom 5269435555157908034 | 19 | 6.51% | |
| custom 5350716797622442220 | 8 | 2.74% | |
| custom 6005662304824203821 | 6 | 2.05% |
Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 292reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 28 March 2026 to 14 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @pablo_ngb. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 28 March 2026 to 14 July 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Posted without readable text
custom 52694355551579080345
Posted without readable text
custom 52694355551579080343custom 54431464265676347122custom 59361382905193494852
Что тут интересного? 🤓
custom 59361382905193494857custom 53502918363783074624custom 54495059502830784743custom 52694355551579080342
Продажи стартовали!
custom 54249724700231040896custom 54495059502830784745custom 59361382905193494853
🫶 Уже сегодня в 16:00 МСК состоится запуск продажи стикеров Wen Lambo Страница сейла с подробным описанием уже доступна на Getgems. Также можно купить через приложение. 🔵Whitelist • Старт: 9 апреля, 16:00 по МСК • Цена: 25 TON за NFT • Лимит: до 10 NFT на кошелек 🔵Public Sale • Старт: 9 апреля, 20:00 по МСК • Цена: 35 TON за NFT
custom 53507167976224422204custom 53502918363783074623custom 59361382905193494853custom 52694355551579080342
🏆 Список победителей: @NewYorker2030 @ololowka24 @xekkyq @DANGERdaaan @yaklovn Передам ваши кошельки команде Wen Lambo, вам будет доступен WL на указанных кошельках 🚀 Запуск продаж стикеров будет послезавтра, приготовьтесь!
custom 59361382905193494855custom 54249724700231040894custom 54495059502830784744
🫶 Розыгрыш 5 WL для стикеров от Wen Lambo Для участия нужно: ✅ Подписаться на мой канал @pablo_ngb ✅ Написать в комментариях под этим постом адрес вашего TON кошелька (некостодиального) Итоги будут сегодня в 18:00 по мск! Через @ngb_app_bot позже сделаю другой розыгрыш
custom 542497247002310408910custom 52582782780949241777custom 54495059502830784747
☀️ GM. Wen Lambo запускает собственные утилити-стикеры. С подробностями рекомендую ознакомиться в презентации. Выглядит всё очень круто, мне понравилось К чему веду? Команда Wen Lambo решила выделить для подписчиков моего канала 5 WL, благодаря которым вы сможете урвать до 10 стикеров на кошелёк с хорошей скидкой. Возможно, сможете продать потом дороже Позже сделаю подробный пост, зачем они вообще нужны. Розыгрыш W…
custom 52582782780949241774custom 54249724700231040893custom 54495059502830784743custom 52694355551579080342custom 54431464265676347122custom 59361382905193494852
Главный вопрос вот в чём: неужели это законно? Незаконно это нихрена! Но если вам очень скучно, то можно посмотреть какие сообщения пишут пользователи Telegram в подписях к подаркам. Ну и по сути, можно видеть как деньги текут в карман к Дурову. Каждую минуту десятки подарков делают ему чистую прибыль, чтобы раскидаться с долгами. Очень странный осадок остается, если хотя бы пару минут последить за этим чатом. Как…
custom 54431464265676347126custom 53502918363783074623custom 59361382905193494853
🎁 Павел Дуров: 😎 Телеграм был заблокирован в России — тем не менее, 65 миллионов россиян до сих пор пользуются им ежедневно через VPN, а более 50 миллионов отправляют сообщения каждый день. Правительство тоже годами пыталось запретить VPN. Их попытки блокировки просто вызвали массовый банковский кризис — вчера наличные на короткое время стали единственным способом оплаты по всей стране. 😂 🧊 Иран заблокировал Телегр…
custom 59361382905193494857custom 53502918363783074626custom 54249724700231040896
🫶 Розыгрыш завершился, призы отправил победителям, проверяйте лс от меня!
custom 54249724700231040896custom 54495059502830784745custom 59361382905193494855
😂 У Gift Fest там всё хорошо? Надеюсь, это первоапрельская шутка
custom 54431464265676347126custom 60056623048242038216custom 52694355551579080345
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @pablo_ngb. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Citation-graph rank — 498,400 of 1,340,412entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@pablo_ngb named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“PABLO” (@pablo_ngb), 256 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/pablo_ngb.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.