Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 25 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 78% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
7 measurements spanning 34 days, net -9. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 146–157 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
10 Sept 2026, 11:20
147
-2
31 Aug 2026, 22:05
149
-1
23 Aug 2026, 23:33
150
-1
15 Aug 2026, 08:06
151
-4
8 Aug 2026, 18:31
155
no change
8 Aug 2026, 07:26
155
-1
7 Aug 2026, 14:34
156
first reading
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 8 January 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 13 April 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
13s
Average length
13s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
527 reactions across 20 posts, in 17 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 14.2% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
custom 5343873355646775152
75
14.2%
custom 5355063197151807311
72
13.7%
custom 5346214009743878535
44
8.35%
custom 5454330843528971202
44
8.35%
🔥
42
7.97%
custom 5345784809367022527
40
7.59%
custom 5345957144929775175
40
7.59%
custom 5472379464337860612
37
7.02%
custom 5231354884757925373
36
6.83%
❤
27
5.12%
custom 5456461413595756488
23
4.36%
custom 5334671731812477231
16
3.04%
custom 5472095442445542168
14
2.66%
custom 5355102556232108893
11
2.09%
custom 5197434882321567830
3
0.569%
custom 6028527022785958570
2
0.38%
custom 5406581888213076462
1
0.19%
Custom emoji. 15 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 527 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 8 January 2025 to 13 April 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
97
across the posts below
Posts paid on
15
of 20 we hold a reading for · 75%
Most on one post
17
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @p2parbitrage_akk. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 8 January 2025 to 13 April 2025. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Связка без карт 🪙
Все знают связку с банкоматом Т-банка❗️
Но не у каждого в городе есть обменник💱
Поэтому, чтобы продавать наши usdt за наличку, мы используем эту функцию в Т-банке
Выставляем объявление на бирже и в условиях пишем следующее:
Оплата через QR-код в приложении банка
Далее они должны:
зайти в Тинькофф найти кнопку снять наличные➡️ввести сумму ➡️нажать кнопку создать QR-код ➡️заскринить это код и скинут…
Международная связка на 8-12%❗️
1. Покупка USDT за рубли:
У нас есть 500,000 рублей. При курсе покупки 100.25 рубля за один USDT мы можем купить 4,988.78 USDT.
Данный курс покупки за наличку в обменнике! Карта не используется
2. Продажа USDT за саудовские риалы:
Эти 4,988.78 USDT мы продаем по курсу 4.3 саудовских риала за единицу. В результате получаем 21,452.75 саудовских риалов.
3.Покупка USDT за саудовски…
اَلسَّلَامُ عَلَيْكُمْ وَرَحْمَةُ ٱللَّٰهِ وَبَرَكَاتُهُ🤝
Хочу объявить о продаже связок без карт ❗️
с помощью которых, вы выйдете на стабильный доход 📊
общее количество связок 20 ⏺
цена: 70💵
связь: @a464kk
Мануал для вывода с ВТБ ⚠️
😄 Прилет блока ограничивает доступ к карте на 10 календарных дней.
🏆 На 11 день Вы приходите в банк и пишите заявление на разблокировку счёта под закрытие ДКО (договор комплексного обслуживания-расторжение обслуживания).
Процедура рассмотрения ДКО займет 5 календарных дней (можно попробовать учинить скандал и возможно эти 5 дней превратятся в 3, но нужно будет очень постараться). На…
сегодня поработал со связкой с фермой карт с депом 15.000💸
заработал 1500💸
думаю запустить челлендж сколько, я заработаю за 7 дней с определенным депозитом , как вы думаете, делать ❓
СВЯЗКА С USD 💵
выставляем объявление на покупку usd по курсу 1.00
ставим лимиты от 1 💵
указываем российские банки: 😁😁
после закупки⬇️
выставляем объявление на продажу уже по курсу 1.2💵
так же выбираем российские банки
подведем итоги ↔️
закупились мы по курсу 102-103 💸
продали по 120 💸
спред хороший , но ликвид слабый
ТЕЛЕГРАММ КОШЕЛЕК ❗️
В чем плюсы этого кошелька ❓
1️⃣Легкое получение мейкера
2️⃣Хороший спред
3️⃣удобный способ хранение средств, по уровню надежности кошелек можно сравнить с такими крупными биржами как 😁 и BB
Что я скажу по своему опыту❓
Кошелек для работы отличный, но во всем есть минусы.
❌Минус: этого кошелька заключаются в том , что на этом кошельке слабый ликвид , но все равно этот кошелек для меня остает…
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @p2parbitrage_akk. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 8 January 2025 to 13 April 2025. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“𝑷𝟐𝑷 𝑨𝑲𝑲 / Арбитраж / Связки” (@p2parbitrage_akk), 147 subscribers as measured 10 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/p2parbitrage_akk.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
