Я ВСЕХ ЖДУ
Channel
ПЕРЕХОД 𝙢𝙖𝙣 𝙃𝙖𝙧𝙧𝙮
@p0ttEr_x
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
24subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 14 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1002217463542 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @p0ttEr_x |
| Description | цель — 𝚘𝚠𝚗𝚎𝚛 — @POTTER_XX 𝚒𝚗𝚏𝚘 — @p0tter_info 𝚕𝚘𝚟𝚎 — @malfoyxdiarys |
| Created | Between 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 14 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 15 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/p0ttEr_x |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 14 Aug 2026, 20:31 | 24 | no change |
| 14 Aug 2026, 20:17 | 24 | first reading |
Engagement
18 posts held, back to 15 October 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 18 posts for this entry, the most recent from 21 February 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- 158
- Videos
- 51
- Links
- 21
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 14 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
- Video runtime
- 14s
- Average length
- 14s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
70 reactions across 6 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 30.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5231285130194070297 | 21 | 30.0% | |
| custom 5230988244874700650 | 11 | 15.7% | |
| custom 5231454150042068725 | 11 | 15.7% | |
| custom 5231264419861767160 | 10 | 14.3% | |
| ❤ | 5 | 7.14% | |
| 💋 | 5 | 7.14% | |
| custom 5231394780709135922 | 2 | 2.86% | |
| 💘 | 2 | 2.86% | |
| 🔥 | 2 | 2.86% | |
| 👍 | 1 | 1.43% |
Custom emoji. 5 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 6 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 70reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 15 October 2024 to 21 February 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
ПЕРЕХОД БЫСТРО
https://t.me/DarkHPotter
Channel name was changed to «ПЕРЕХОД 𝙢𝙖𝙣 𝙃𝙖𝙧𝙧𝙮»
Channel photo removed
делаем переход?
- дооо59%
- ну хс😝41%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
ахах
оплатите мне приемку..
Самый лучший день заходил вчера Ночью ехать лень, пробыл до утра Но пришла пора, и собрался в путь Ну и ладно, будь! Что-то главное вышло из моды А мы согласно законам природы Всё вгрызаемся в мир, будто рыба-пила Остаётся лишь тонкая нам нить Как по-русски, уже не упомнить А по-аглицки, стало быть, love Самый лучший день заходил вчера Ночью ехать лень, пробыл до утра Но пришла пора, и собрался в путь Ну и ладно, буд…
custom 52312851301940702976custom 52314541500420687254custom 52309882448747006503💘2🔥2custom 52312644198617671602
Video, posted without a caption
хехе, новая ава ребят))
custom 52309882448747006507custom 52314541500420687253
Channel photo updated
Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @p0ttEr_x. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
делаем переход?
- дооо59%
- ну хс😝41%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 15 October 2024 to 21 February 2025. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
@cdiggorydiary · 531 post-ˋˏ–𝐒𝐰𝐞𝐞𝐭 𝐆𝐫𝐞𝐞𝐧𝐠𝐫𝐚𝐬𝐬𝆺𝅥𝆹𝅥˖ ࣪ ִֶָ
@DaphneGreengraass · 341 postПЕРЕХОД 𝙩𝙝𝙚 𝙂𝙤𝙡𝙙𝙚𝙣 𝘽𝙤𝙮 𝙙𝙞𝙖𝙧𝙮
@DarkHPotter · 161 postДневник мертвого поета
@diarydeadpoet · 11 post𝐂𝐋𝐄𝐀𝐍𝐈𝐍𝐆!!!𝐅𝐈𝐋𝐈𝐔𝐒 𝐋𝐈𝐍𝐀𝐄 — 𝐑𝐄𝐌𝐔𝐒.|𝐌𝐎𝐍𝐂𝐇𝐄𝐑𝐘
@diaryofremuslyupine · 691 post𝐷𝑖𝑎𝑟𝑦 𝑜𝑓 𝑡ℎ𝑒 𝑃𝑎𝑛𝑠𝑦 𝑃𝑎𝑟𝑘𝑖𝑛𝑠𝒐𝑛
@diarypansy · 861 post𝑭𝒊𝒏𝒏𝒊𝒈𝒂𝒏'𝒔 𝒏𝒐𝒕𝒆𝒔 «𝐶𝑙𝑜𝑠𝑒𝑑»
@fireFinnigan · 451 post𝐓𝐇𝐄 𝐒𝐄𝐑𝐏𝐄𝐍𝐓’𝐒 𝐇𝐄𝐀𝐑𝐓
@fostergirl · 161 post౨ৎ 𝐂𝐡𝐚𝐫𝐦𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐆𝐫𝐚𝐧𝐠𝐞𝐫.
@GRANGERRIH · 361 postзакрыт.
@higgsdiary · 181 post𝐓𝐇𝐄 𝐄𝐍𝐃: 𝐋𝐀𝐍𝐓𝐒𝐎𝐕
@HisMajestySturmhond · 791 post(Закрыт)𝐉𝐨𝐮𝐫𝐧𝐚𝐥 𝐃𝐞 𝐏𝐫𝐢𝐧𝐜𝐞𝐬𝐬𝐞.
@journaldeprincesse · 21 post[переход]
@l1yzatyrp · 131 post𝐏𝐑𝐈𝐍𝐂𝐄 𝐃𝐄 𝐌𝐀𝐋𝐅𝐎𝐘
@malfoyxdiarys · 621 post(переход!!) 𝐾𝑜𝑝𝑒𝑒𝑐ℎ𝑘𝑎 𝑇𝑟𝑒𝑙𝑎𝑤𝑛𝑒𝑦. 𝑀𝑎𝑦 𝑇𝑟𝑒𝑙𝑎𝑤𝑛𝑒𝑦.
@maymay_trelawney · 51 post𝐂𝐀𝐑𝐍𝐄𝐓 𝐃𝐄 𝐍𝐎𝐓𝐓.
@ONLYCARNETNOTT · 811 post.
@pansywrites · 21 post𝘴𝘰𝘶𝘷𝘦𝘯𝘪𝘳𝘴 𝘥𝘦 𝘙.𝘈.𝘉.
@rabsmemory · 121 postзакрыт
@sekspank228 · 101 post𝑹𝑬𝑪𝑶𝑹𝑫𝑰𝑵𝑮𝑺 𝑶𝑭 𝑺𝑬𝑿𝑼𝑨𝑳 𝑵𝑶𝑻𝑻
@sexnottk · 261 post𝑭𝑹𝑶𝒁𝑬𝑵 // 𝑺𝑲𝒀 𝑺𝑻𝑬𝑽𝑬𝑵𝑺
@Sky_Stevens · 251 postзакрыт|𝐶𝑈𝑅𝐿𝑌 𝑁𝑂𝑇𝑇𝑌
@ThediareofTheooo · 191 post— 𝕮𝗨𝗥𝗦𝕰𝐃 𝕭𝗥𝗨𝐉𝕬. #пэнсухазабивная
@WTPXNY · 1201 postмама андра.
@yourmotherandra · 821 post
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
- Dead references
- 21
- handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
- Evidenced gone
- 0
- we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
- Never seen alive
- 21
- vacant every time we have ever looked
@p0ttEr_x named 21 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
named in 1 post, 15 August 2026 – 15 August 2026
named in 1 post, 15 August 2026 – 15 August 2026
named in 1 post, 15 August 2026 – 15 August 2026
named in 1 post, 15 August 2026 – 15 August 2026
named in 1 post, 15 August 2026 – 15 August 2026
named in 1 post, 15 August 2026 – 15 August 2026
named in 1 post, 15 August 2026 – 15 August 2026
named in 1 post, 15 August 2026 – 15 August 2026
named in 1 post, 15 August 2026 – 15 August 2026
named in 1 post, 15 August 2026 – 15 August 2026
named in 1 post, 15 August 2026 – 15 August 2026
named in 1 post, 15 August 2026 – 15 August 2026
named in 1 post, 15 August 2026 – 15 August 2026
named in 1 post, 15 August 2026 – 15 August 2026
named in 1 post, 15 August 2026 – 15 August 2026
named in 1 post, 15 August 2026 – 15 August 2026
named in 1 post, 15 August 2026 – 15 August 2026
named in 1 post, 15 August 2026 – 15 August 2026
named in 1 post, 15 August 2026 – 15 August 2026
named in 1 post, 15 August 2026 – 15 August 2026
named in 1 post, 15 August 2026 – 15 August 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“ПЕРЕХОД 𝙢𝙖𝙣 𝙃𝙖𝙧𝙧𝙮” (@p0ttEr_x), 24 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/p0ttEr_x.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.