Ребят, давайте рассказывайте, откуда тут 148 просмотров? Слили ссылку наш канал или что?
🤔2
Signed 👽Лопата щавеллллл 😝😝 #ХейтерДжонДоу

Channel
@p0pl5
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
30subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 12 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002032276283 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @p0pl5 |
| Created | Between 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 12 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 13 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/p0pl5 |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 13 Aug 2026, 09:39 | 30 | no change |
| 12 Aug 2026, 19:16 | 30 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 12 June 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 5 October 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
75 reactions across 14 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 26.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5366528084067495474 | 20 | 26.7% | |
| 💔 | 14 | 18.7% | |
| ❤ | 11 | 14.7% | |
| custom 5345842946044341465 | 8 | 10.7% | |
| custom 5364233991710845084 | 5 | 6.67% | |
| 🥰 | 5 | 6.67% | |
| custom 5361931464038428976 | 4 | 5.33% | |
| 🔥 | 3 | 4.00% | |
| 🤔 | 2 | 2.67% | |
| 🤯 | 2 | 2.67% | |
| custom 5258497845413030870 | 1 | 1.33% |
Custom emoji. 5 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 75reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 12 June 2024 to 5 October 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Ребят, давайте рассказывайте, откуда тут 148 просмотров? Слили ссылку наш канал или что?
🤔2
Signed 👽Лопата щавеллллл 😝😝 #ХейтерДжонДоу
Так ещё откуда здесь просмотры 😭
🥰1
Signed 👽Лопата щавеллллл 😝😝 [チャンス]
Кого хрена тут 1,2к просмотров?
❤1💔1
Signed 👽Лопата щавеллллл 😝😝 [チャンス]
КОГО ХРЕНА ТУТ 200 ПРОСМОТРЛВ
🔥3
Signed Pepsi
Вот ссылка на ткг)
Signed Pepsi
https://t.me/Lop00123
Signed Pepsi
У меня всё готово) скидывать?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
❤2
Signed Pepsi
ЕСЛИ ШАНС НА ОТКРЫТИЕ ТКГ?! Чтож я скажу... ДА ЗАВТРА Я ВЫЛОЖУ НОВЫЙ ТКГ! П ИМЕННО 16:00-18:00 , а может и раньше
❤5
Signed Pepsi
Кому о дать ткг? Писать сюда @zxc1qf0
Signed Pepsi
С кем в роблокс поиграть? Если тут АФК не остались
custom 53619314640384289762
Signed Pepsi
🧀: админ ожил.. но видимо уже поздно
custom 53665280840674954745
Signed ¡!• 𝙽𝚒𝚔𝚒𝚌𝚑 •°
[Закрыто]Cookie run Russian🇷🇺🍪(Куки РАН и Стикеры) pinned «Простите но я закрываю от ткг Причины: 1:надоело/нету времени 2:Админ не актив (меня это бесит и растраивает) 3:Мало инфы по обновлениям 4:отписки Все пока пока!»
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @p0pl5. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
У меня всё готово) скидывать?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 12 June 2024 to 5 October 2025. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank — 1,037,526 of 1,336,469entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@p0pl5 named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“[Закрыто]Cookie run Russian🇷🇺🍪(Куки РАН и Стикеры)” (@p0pl5), 30 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/p0pl5.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.