надеюсь на долго хахах еле разобралась как все красиво оформлять
custom 53007405968208931092custom 54633435961764526232custom 53417683878800468141
Signed Lena

Channel
@ozxsin
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
32subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1003613513899 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @ozxsin |
| Description | – 𝘧𝘰𝘳𝘦𝘷𝘦𝘳 𝘪𝘯 𝘮𝘺 𝘩𝘦𝘢𝘳𝘵 далекий город | розы и грехи | возможная любовь |
| Created | Between 1 December 2025 and 31 May 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 11 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 11 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/ozxsin |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 11 Aug 2026, 02:17 | 32 | no change |
| 8 Aug 2026, 13:46 | 32 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 28 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 10 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (28 July 2026 – 10 August 2026) |
| Views total | 1,515 |
| Reactions total | 289 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 11 Aug 2026, 02:17 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 11 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 8 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
289 reactions across 20 posts, in 16 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 28.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 💋 | 83 | 28.7% | |
| 🍓 | 78 | 27.0% | |
| 💘 | 72 | 24.9% | |
| 🕊 | 37 | 12.8% | |
| custom 5462978008560214147 | 3 | 1.04% | |
| custom 5300740596820893109 | 2 | 0.692% | |
| custom 5341768387880046814 | 2 | 0.692% | |
| custom 5463343596176452623 | 2 | 0.692% | |
| custom 5463377775526201347 | 2 | 0.692% | |
| custom 5465532938575717022 | 2 | 0.692% | |
| custom 5213137639238045873 | 1 | 0.346% | |
| custom 5213359753471737297 | 1 | 0.346% | |
| custom 5301188506075293101 | 1 | 0.346% | |
| custom 5318941306716699412 | 1 | 0.346% | |
| custom 5462930480452118902 | 1 | 0.346% | |
| custom 5465169794795872594 | 1 | 0.346% |
Custom emoji. 12 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 289reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 28 July 2026 to 10 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
надеюсь на долго хахах еле разобралась как все красиво оформлять
custom 53007405968208931092custom 54633435961764526232custom 53417683878800468141
Signed Lena
небольшие изменения в канале) 🤩
custom 54629780085602141472custom 52133597534717372971custom 53011885060752931011custom 53189413067166994121custom 54629304804521189021custom 54651697947958725941
Signed Lena
“ну какие cute🥺🤍„ #озсин
🍓3💋2💘2custom 53417683878800468141custom 54633777755262013471custom 54655329385757170221
Signed Lena
”o, sadece kendi kurallarıyla parıldayan bir yıldızdı. Başkalarının ışığına ihtiyaç duymaz, kendi karanlığından bile asil bir aydınlık yaratırdı„ — она была звездой, что сияет лишь по своим собственным правилам, не нуждалась в чужом свете умела создавать благородное сияние даже из собственной темноты 🤩 #синемунсал
🍓8💋5💘5custom 54633777755262013471custom 54655329385757170221
Signed Lena
”İki güçlü ruhun karşı karşıya gelmesi bir savaş değil; birbirinin gölgesini bile parlatma sanatıdır„ встреча двух сильных душ — это не война, а искусство заставлять сиять даже тени друг друга🖤 #озсин
💘4🍓2🕊2custom 52131376392380458731custom 54629780085602141471
Signed Lena
“никаких лишних слов, только тяжелое притяжение и запретная страсть„ она не отступает,он не сбавляет натиск. Расстояние между ними стерто до нескольких сантиметров. Полная темнота вокруг и двое, сгорающих от взаимного притяжения. И вот наконец финал долгого сопротивления, уступившего место безумному, лишающему разума желанию #джихал #далекийгород
💋6🕊4🍓3💘3
Signed Lena
“bazen en büyük kaçış, dünyanın öbür ucuna gitmek değil; kalabalık bir şehrin ortasında, herkesin içinde sadece birbirinin gözlerinde kaybolmaktır„ иногда самый лучший побег — это не поездка на край света, а умение затеряться в глазах друг друга прямо посреди шумного города на виду у всех #дурсел
💋7🕊5💘4
Signed Lena
“bir kadının yaydığı en güçlü enerji, kendi hayatının iplerini elinde tuttuğunu gösteren o umursamaz gülüşüdür„ — самая мощная энергия, которую она излучает – её беззаботная улыбка, показывающая, что она сама держит нити своей жизни #синемунсал
🍓6💘5💋4
Signed Lena
“она не делает ни шагу назад, принимая правила этой опасной игры„ расстояние между ними сокращается до предела — слышен каждый рваный вдох и безумный стук сердец. Его пальцы едва заметно касаются ее руки,а дальше всё как в тумане. Это не просто близость, это секунда до неизбежного взрыва. Время вокруг них окончательно замирает, оставляя лишь чистое, обжигающее чувство, от которого у обоих уже нет сил, да и желания сб…
🍓7💋4💘4
Signed Lena
какая же красивая 💔 а эта улыбка… #синемунсал
💘7💋5🍓4🕊2
Signed Lena
“yarı karanlığın o aldatıcı hafifliği ile ruhun o karanlık, sarsıcı ve insanı kendi girdabına çeken ağır şehveti arasındaki muazzam gerilim„ — колоссальное напряжение между обманчивой легкостью полумрака, и этой темной, затягивающей в свою собственную пропасть тяжелой страстью души #синемунсал
🍓6💘6💋5🕊4
Signed Lena
“bir bakışın sessizliğinde ve huzurunda, genellikle söylenmiş binlerce kelimeden çok daha fazla anlam gizlidir„ — в тишине и спокойствии взгляда часто скрывается гораздо больше смысла, чем в тысячах сказанных слов #синемунсал
🍓7💋6💘4🕊4
Signed Lena
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @ozxsin. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 219,150 of 1,183,361entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“𝐨𝐳𝐱𝐬𝐢𝐧” (@ozxsin), 32 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ozxsin.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.