Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for OZON

Channel

OZON

@ozonru

Verified by TelegramNot marked by Telegram, checked 20 September 2026

On this record: Topic · Observations · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · View velocity · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Domains linked from posts · Cite this entry

1,116,448subscribers

+67,644 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among the largest entries.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001517312714
TypeChannel
Username@ozonru
DescriptionОфициальный канал маркетплейса Ozon для покупателей. Чат-бот поддержки в Max: https://max.ru/ozon_support_bot Правила группы: https://ozon.ru/t/75Pn9dd Регистрация в перечне РКН: https://s.ozon.ru/6Drw8Qw
Created15 April 2022 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live18 September 2026
Measurements held34
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 18 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/ozonru

Topic

Ecommerce storefront — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 8 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 73% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Observations

These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.

Views and reactions moved apart

On 3 of the 19 posts we watched over 30 days, the view counter climbed while the reaction counter stayed where it was — by more than this channel’s own reactions-per-view rate can account for. That rate, measured on this entry, is 0.0045 reactions per view.

Each interval, as we read it — views and reactions before and after
PostOverViewsReactionsExpected
/894415 Sept 2026, 14:40 UTC5 days45,600 → 52,900at least +7,200228 → 234at most +7+32.2
/894516 Sept 2026, 09:06 UTC5 days42,300 → 51,700at least +9,300179 → 187at most +9+41.6
/895517 Sept 2026, 09:15 UTC5 days36,900 → 47,000at least +10,000163 → 172at most +10+44.8

Expected is the view gain multiplied by this channel’s own prior reactions-per-view rate over the same post — not a corpus average, so a channel whose audience never reacts is compared only against itself. Every interval is credited in the direction that makes the observation harder to record, never easier: t.me renders views and reactions to three significant figures above ~1,000, so a raw delta can be a rendering step. Every delta below is at least 4 x the coarser reading's step, the view gain is discounted by a full step and the reaction gain credited with one. Measured by tgregister velocity.py (our own t.me/s/ readings).

What this does and does not say. It says the two counters moved apart, by more than rounding and more than this channel’s own history predicts. It asserts no cause. Views arriving from outside Telegram, an embedded or forwarded copy of the post, and a burst of readers who simply do not react all produce this shape. This detector has recorded very few observations across the whole register, and its precision has not been measured; treat it as an anomaly worth looking at, not as a finding.

Recorded under the key view_reaction_decoupling, last confirmed 27 September 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.

Growth

1,035,9791,137,7881,086,883.56 August 2026 — 1,048,804 subscribers6 August 2026 — 1,048,471 subscribers7 August 2026 — 1,047,913 subscribers8 August 2026 — 1,047,437 subscribers9 August 2026 — 1,046,909 subscribers10 August 2026 — 1,046,468 subscribers11 August 2026 — 1,046,052 subscribers12 August 2026 — 1,045,733 subscribers13 August 2026 — 1,045,229 subscribers14 August 2026 — 1,044,467 subscribers16 August 2026 — 1,043,790 subscribers17 August 2026 — 1,043,227 subscribers18 August 2026 — 1,042,777 subscribers19 August 2026 — 1,042,327 subscribers20 August 2026 — 1,041,768 subscribers21 August 2026 — 1,041,384 subscribers23 August 2026 — 1,042,183 subscribers24 August 2026 — 1,042,831 subscribers25 August 2026 — 1,042,577 subscribers26 August 2026 — 1,042,226 subscribers27 August 2026 — 1,041,833 subscribers28 August 2026 — 1,041,432 subscribers29 August 2026 — 1,041,090 subscribers30 August 2026 — 1,040,766 subscribers31 August 2026 — 1,040,284 subscribers1 September 2026 — 1,039,830 subscribers2 September 2026 — 1,038,932 subscribers4 September 2026 — 1,038,446 subscribers6 September 2026 — 1,037,477 subscribers10 September 2026 — 1,035,979 subscribers12 September 2026 — 1,137,788 subscribers14 September 2026 — 1,125,718 subscribers15 September 2026 — 1,120,238 subscribers18 September 2026 — 1,116,448 subscribers1,116,4486 August 202618 September 2026
34 measurements spanning 43 days, net +67,644. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,020,708–1,153,059 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 34
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
18 Sept 2026, 06:171,116,448-3,790
15 Sept 2026, 22:391,120,238-5,480
14 Sept 2026, 02:371,125,718-12,070
12 Sept 2026, 07:001,137,788+101,809
10 Sept 2026, 01:581,035,979-1,498
6 Sept 2026, 16:391,037,477-969
4 Sept 2026, 05:361,038,446-486
2 Sept 2026, 20:441,038,932-898
1 Sept 2026, 16:161,039,830-454
31 Aug 2026, 15:371,040,284-482
30 Aug 2026, 13:441,040,766-324
29 Aug 2026, 16:131,041,090-342
28 Aug 2026, 16:371,041,432-401
27 Aug 2026, 15:381,041,833-393
26 Aug 2026, 14:121,042,226-351
25 Aug 2026, 17:281,042,577-254
24 Aug 2026, 18:031,042,831+648
23 Aug 2026, 03:281,042,183+799
21 Aug 2026, 13:181,041,384-384
20 Aug 2026, 15:181,041,768first reading

Engagement

601 posts held, back to 23 January 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 166 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
4.53%
avg views ÷ 1,116,448 subscribers
Avg views / post
50,500
51 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.452%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
51
of 601 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 26 September 2026
Posts held601 (23 January 2026 – 26 September 2026)
Views total2,576,800
Reactions total11,640
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken27 Sept 2026, 04:15 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈7,090
Videos
≈951
Links
≈2,450

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 26 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
13m 28s
Average length
25s

Measured directly from 32 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

View velocity

How fast this channel’s own posts pick up views, from re-reading them repeatedly in the hours and days after they were published rather than the single reading most entries on this register get. Coverage is early and only a small minority of channels hold it at all — a gap in this section means the post has not been re-read again yet, not that nothing happened.

Computed from 26 of this channel’s own posts over the last 30 days (1 of the 24-hour readings behind this are interpolated, not measured directly): across 22 of this channel’s own posts with a clear reading, a typical one reaches half of its last-observed view count within 9.8 hours of being posted; a typical post has already reached 25.9% of its 24-hour view count within the first hour, and 59.8% within the first six; the median 24-hour reach across those posts is 31,550 views — 2.83% of this channel’s own subscriber count (90th percentile 51,230).

8 most recently posted, with a view-velocity reading
PostReadingsLatest readingCurve24h reachHalf of last-observed views by
/901626 Sept 2026, 09:02 UTC2019 minutes – 19 hours old24,500 views ~174 reactions60 minutes: 7,430 → 3.0 hours: 12,400 → 6.0 hours: 16,800 → 12 hours: 22,600still climbing at last readingnot yet at 24h3.0 hoursprovisional — final view count still climbing
/901525 Sept 2026, 14:03 UTC4211 minutes – 38 hours old32,000 views ~145 reactions60 minutes: 6,552 interp. → 3.0 hours: 11,400 → 6.0 hours: 15,300 → 12 hours: 17,400 → 24 hours: 27,500still climbing at last reading27,500measured7.0 hours
/901425 Sept 2026, 08:45 UTC4720 minutes – 44 hours old32,400 views ~131 reactions60 minutes: 7,320 → 3.0 hours: 12,200 → 6.0 hours: 17,300 → 12 hours: 22,900 → 24 hours: 26,300still climbing at last reading26,300measured5.5 hours
/897619 Sept 2026, 09:01 UTC1919 minutes – 7 days old55,600 views ~257 reactions60 minutes: 6,349 interp. → 3.0 hours: 11,200 → 6.0 hours: 15,500 → 12 hours: 19,643 interp. → 24 hours: 26,450 interp. → 2 days: 37,753 interp. → 7 days: 55,600still climbing at last reading26,450interpolated26 hours
/896918 Sept 2026, 14:02 UTC4020 minutes – 7 days old52,600 views ~231 reactions60 minutes: 7,226 interp. → 3.0 hours: 12,700 → 6.0 hours: 17,200 → 12 hours: 19,500 → 24 hours: 29,500 → 2 days: 37,965 interp. → 7 days: 52,600still climbing at last reading29,500measured20 hours
/896518 Sept 2026, 08:45 UTC4516 minutes – 7 days old48,300 views ~244 reactions60 minutes: 9,328 interp. → 3.0 hours: 15,200 → 6.0 hours: 21,500 → 12 hours: 26,700 → 24 hours: 30,000 → 2 days: 35,896 interp. → 7 days: 48,300still climbing at last reading30,000measured8.5 hours
/895617 Sept 2026, 14:04 UTC6415 minutes – 7 days old48,400 views ~213 reactions60 minutes: 7,946 interp. → 3.0 hours: 13,500 → 6.0 hours: 18,200 → 12 hours: 20,500 → 24 hours: 31,500 → 2 days: 37,400 → 7 days: 48,400still climbing at last reading31,500measured17 hours
/895517 Sept 2026, 09:15 UTC3720 minutes – 7 days old47,000 views ~172 reactions60 minutes: 8,614 interp. → 3.0 hours: 14,236 interp. → 6.0 hours: 21,100 → 12 hours: 26,200 → 24 hours: 30,400 → 2 days: 36,900 → 7 days: 46,167 interp.still climbing at last reading30,400measured8.2 hours

Curve is every standard checkpoint we hold a reading for (+1h, +3h, +6h, +12h, +24h, +48h, +7d after posting) — measured where a real reading landed close enough to that age, interpolated where it did not but readings on both sides let one be worked out between them. Nothing is ever extrapolated past the last real reading. Latest reading is the newest view and reaction count we hold for the post, side by side, so a gap between how views and reactions moved is visible without following it into the Observations section above. 24h reach is that one checkpoint on its own, labelled the same way. Half of last-observed views is the age at which a post’s view count crossed half of the highest figure we have read for it so far — an upper bound when the very first reading was already past half (we cannot see the actual crossing), and biased low while the post is still climbing, since “half of final” is dividing by a number that has not finished growing yet. Both caveats are printed inline wherever they apply, never silently dropped.

Reaction mix

34,578 reactions across 105 posts, in 25 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 35.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤12,17035.2%
👍5,83316.9%
🔥3,4379.94%
👎2,7397.92%
🙏2,2746.58%
😱1,9905.76%
🤣1,9415.61%
😁8932.58%
😢8642.50%
🥰5781.67%
❤‍🔥4811.39%
🕊2400.694%
🤔2330.674%
👏1750.506%
☃1650.477%
🤯1070.309%
🌚900.26%
😍790.228%
🎉650.188%
🐳590.171%
5 further kinds1650.477%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 597 of the 601 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 431,286 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 601 most recent posts we hold, published 23 January 2026 to 26 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
109
across the posts below
Posts paid on
48
of 597 we hold a reading for · 8%
Most on one post
28
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @ozonru. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 601 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 23 January 2026 to 26 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

26 Sept 2026, 09:02 UTC≈24,500 views174 reactionsread 27 September 2026
Photo

💌 500 баллов вам — 15% скидка другу В Ozon Селект появился личный промокод, которым можно делиться с друзьями. Они получат скидку 15% на первый заказ, вы — 500 баллов за каждого, кто воспользуется вашим промокодом. Как это работает: • промокод ждёт вас в приложении на странице акции и в личном кабинете • отправляйте его другу, он получит скидку 15% на первый заказ • за каждый заказ по промокоду вам начислим 500 бал…

👍93❤36🔥20👎16🤔6☃3

25 Sept 2026, 14:03 UTC≈32,000 views145 reactionsread 27 September 2026
Photo

Запусти карьеру мечты — на фесте Ozon On 💙 Хочешь работать в ведущей компании, но не знаешь, как туда пробиться? Тогда приходи на Ozon On — бесплатный фест про карьеру. За один день ты попадёшь в закулисье крупного бизнеса и узнаешь от экспертов Ozon, как построить карьеру, в которой будешь самовыражаться на максимум. А главной звездой феста станет актриса и блогер Маш Милаш, скучно точно не будет! Твоя программа-…

👍81❤42👎9🔥7☃2💯2🤔2

25 Sept 2026, 08:45 UTC≈32,400 views131 reactionsread 27 September 2026
Video

🧺 Дизайн и качество Собрали стильную бытовую технику, которую покупатели хвалят не только за внешний вид, но и за удобство и качество работы. Ищите эти модели и ещё тысячи товаров для дома со скидками до 80% на Большой распродаже электроники. Включили выгоду на максимум до 1 октября! #ozon_подборки 💙 Подписывайтесь на Ozon в MAX

❤78👍28🔥14👎6🌚4☃1

24 Sept 2026, 14:35 UTC≈36,700 views371 reactionsread 27 September 2026
Photo

🎁 Осенью всегда найдётся что купить Прямо сейчас в MAX разыгрываем 20 промокодов по 10 000 рублей. Можно потратить на всё, что пригодится этой осенью: обновить гардероб, купить что-то домой или выбрать подарки близким. Скорее участвуйте в конкурсе. Итоги — 29 сентября! 💙

❤173👎118🔥29👍22❤‍🔥12🤣9🌚4😱3

24 Sept 2026, 08:55 UTC≈37,700 views165 reactions1 Starread 27 September 2026
Video

🎀 Принт, который осенью всегда к месту Клетка бывает разной: крупной и выразительной, сдержанной и почти незаметной, графичной или акцентной. Показываем, как носить её этой осенью 👇🏻 Образ №1 Образ №2 Образ №3 Образ №4 Образ №5 #ozon_подборки 💙 Подписывайтесь на Ozon в MAX

❤102🔥27👎23👍10☃3

23 Sept 2026, 14:05 UTC≈39,300 views231 reactions1 Starread 27 September 2026
Photo

🫖 Включаемся в осень, но не грустим! Дома столько дел, а у нас наконец есть на них время. Включаем скидки до 80% на миллионы товаров на Большой распродаже электроники! Выбирайте технику для дел и отдыха до 1 октября.

👍119❤68🤩25🐳10👎4🥰3☃2

23 Sept 2026, 09:00 UTC≈37,400 views198 reactions1 Starread 27 September 2026
Photo

Коллекция одежды Ozon х ТВОЕ «В свободной форме» 🌟 Если дать волю воображению, получится арт-коллекция одежды с принтами от художников проекта Ozon Баллон. В этой капсуле каждый найдёт что-то своё. Здесь и светлые оттенки с милыми персонажами, и яркие акценты с ироничными сюжетами, и тёмная база с дерзкими героями. У каждого изделия — свой характер и настроение. Что уже приглянулось? Выбирайте по вкусу! 💙 Вся кол…

❤126👍45👎17🤣8🤯1😁1

22 Sept 2026, 15:10 UTC≈39,400 views288 reactions1 Starread 27 September 2026
Photo

🍁 Рецепт осеннего уюта Меняем лёгкий текстиль на мягкий и плотный, зажигаем тёплый свет, расставляем сезонный декор и добавляем пару приятных обновлений для кухни. Вот и всё — дом готов защищать вас от первых холодов. Собрали вещи, которые помогут сделать эту осень особенно тёплой. 🍒 Посуда 🍒 Кружки 🍒 Свет 🍒 Декор 🍒 Текстиль #ozon_подборки 💙 Подписывайтесь на Ozon в MAX

🔥152❤79👍25🥰17❤‍🔥6👎5☃3👏1

22 Sept 2026, 08:22 UTC≈26,600 views154 reactions3 Starsread 23 September 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

❤82🔥37👍28🤔3🙏2☃1🐳1

22 Sept 2026, 08:22 UTC≈25,200 views104 reactionsread 23 September 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

🔥57❤25👍14👏4☃2🙏2

22 Sept 2026, 08:22 UTC≈34,600 views174 reactionsread 24 September 2026

⭐️ Ozon Чемпион на Международном фестивале молодежи 2026 С 11 по 17 сентября в Екатеринбурге прошёл Международный фестиваль молодежи — 10 000 участников из 191 страны! Наши амбассадоры Семён Макаров и Максим Лаллав были в центре внимания: ⚫ устроили мощное шоу на скейтборде и в BMX-фристайле; ⚫ показали крутейшие трюки; ⚫ общались со зрителями и делились фишками подготовки. Фестиваль завершился, а эмоции от высту…

👍94❤45🔥20👎8👏4❤‍🔥2☃1

21 Sept 2026, 15:10 UTC≈35,700 views213 reactionsread 23 September 2026
Photo

🍂 6 аксессуаров в сезонных оттенках Коричневый, бордовый, золото и беж — осеннюю палитру проще всего примерять точечно, с помощью аксессуаров. ✨ Выбрали детали, с которыми базовые пальто и куртки выглядят интереснее. #ozon_подборки 💙 Подписывайтесь на Ozon в MAX

❤128🔥39👍33🥰7👎3😱2☃1

Showing the 12 most recent of 601 posts we hold for @ozonru. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Posts edited after publishing

@ozonru edited 4 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
18 August 2026
Most recent edit
17 September 2026

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 73 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

колорфул журнал
@colorfuljournal · 13,390
20 posts
Системные новости
@sistema_news · 16,155
18 posts
Медиалогия
@medialogia · 13,008
7 posts
Финансы на маркетплейсах | Андрей Яценко
@finamp · 10,019
3 posts
шерстяные проказники • коты
@koshkii_kotiki · 338,897
3 posts
Бумага: всё о Петербурге
@paperpaper_ru · 92,212
3 posts
Розыгрыш Гномов
@Raffle_tg · 10
3 posts
Сталина Гуревич
@StalinaGurevich · 18,116
3 posts
Важные истории
@istories_media · 126,185
2 posts
Колезев ☮️
@kolezev · 59,829
2 posts
Лапша Медиа
@lapshamedia · 39,649
2 posts
хей! это марьяна!
@maryanalokel · 4,803
2 posts
Новая газета Европа
@novaya_europe · 117,011
2 posts
СтудСовет КНИТУ-КАИ
@studsovetkai · 2,124
2 posts
Вот Так
@vottaktv · 30,038
2 posts
ВсОШ по английскому|РУДН 2025
@vsosh_eng · 589
2 posts
ВсОШ по праву|РУДН 2025
@vsosh_law · 807
2 posts
Вайлдберриз. Правда сотрудников
@wb_pravda_sotrudnikov · 11,002
2 posts
Вещи с WB, находки для девушек🥰
@wbgirlloot · 6,176
2 posts
БЕНЗИНОВЫЕ ПАРЫ́
@zinben · 1,478
2 posts
Агентство. Новости
@agentstvonews · 103,697
1 post
️Premium free | Giveaway
@freePremiium · 71
1 post
Giveaways List (premium, folders, channels)
@Giveaways_List · 840
1 post
6 отдел
@otdel_6 · 145
1 post

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Domains linked from posts

18 domains this channel’s own posts have linked to, measured by scanning the post bodies themselves — not the channel’s description, which is the separate Declared links section below when this entry has one. Appearing here is not a claim about who runs the linked site or why the channel linked to it; an advertisement, a news citation and a malicious link all leave the same kind of row.

ozon.ru506 posts · 23 January 2026 – 7 August 2026 · example post
max.ru181 posts · 3 February 2026 – 7 August 2026 · example post
se.ozon.ruregistrable domain: ozon.ru173 posts · 16 February 2026 – 12 May 2026 · example post
www.ozon.ruregistrable domain: ozon.ru167 posts · 23 January 2026 – 5 August 2026 · example post
vkvideo.ru40 posts · 27 January 2026 – 7 August 2026 · example post
vk.ru12 posts · 27 January 2026 – 29 July 2026 · example post
s.ozon.ruregistrable domain: ozon.ru7 posts · 17 February 2026 – 31 July 2026 · example post
docs.ozon.ruregistrable domain: ozon.ru7 posts · 27 January 2026 – 11 March 2026 · example post
ozonselect.onelink.meregistrable domain: onelink.me6 posts · 24 February 2026 – 11 June 2026 · example post
cdn1.ozone.ruregistrable domain: ozone.ru5 posts · 25 April 2026 – 14 May 2026 · example post
champion.ozon.ruregistrable domain: ozon.ru4 posts · 17 March 2026 – 3 August 2026 · example post
vk.cc4 posts · 16 June 2026 – 12 July 2026 · example post
vk.com3 posts · 2 February 2026 – 3 April 2026 · example post
mx-t.su2 posts · 30 May 2026 – 6 June 2026 · example post
ballon.ozon.ruregistrable domain: ozon.ru2 posts · 20 March 2026 – 28 April 2026 · example post
www.buro247.ruregistrable domain: buro247.ru1 post · 27 April 2026 – 27 April 2026 · example post
www.sobaka.ruregistrable domain: sobaka.ru1 post · 4 August 2026 – 4 August 2026 · example post
theblueprint.ru1 post · 21 July 2026 – 21 July 2026 · example post

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“OZON” (@ozonru), 1,116,448 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ozonru.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.