Somebody used Telegram's AI text generator 🤣
😁4
![Telegram profile photo for Shodiyev Ozodbek [Shaxsiy]](https://cdn.tgregister.com/av/4a/4a48ca66a97065aa12ef365cbc339776e99cf8180a53f1614884d554445235d5.jpg)
Channel
@ozodbek_skh
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
104subscribers
-6 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001393416655 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @ozodbek_skh |
| Created | Between 1 April 2018 and 31 July 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 9 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 6 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 14 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/ozodbek_skh |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 14 Sept 2026, 17:38 | 104 | -2 |
| 7 Sept 2026, 13:37 | 106 | -1 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 03:23 | 107 | -1 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 15:06 | 108 | -2 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 07:31 | 110 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 14:50 | 110 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 8 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 8 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
31 reactions across 15 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 58.1% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 😁 | 18 | 58.1% | |
| 👍 | 5 | 16.1% | |
| ❤🔥 | 3 | 9.68% | |
| ❤ | 2 | 6.45% | |
| 🔥 | 2 | 6.45% | |
| 🤣 | 1 | 3.23% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 31 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 8 August 2026 to 8 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Somebody used Telegram's AI text generator 🤣
😁4
📨 Получено сообщение! Oh, how delightfully tragic it is to ponder if one can truly find joy while being seduced by their own fabrications, or if the exquisite delusion of being able to deceive the entire world, save for one's own soul, is merely the narcotic that keeps that wretched vessel alive. And when the smog of these illusions finally lifts, what remains but the scorching, unyielding reality of a life failed,…
😁1
Sticker, posted without a caption
😁2🤣1
After these words, I'm wonderful 😁
❤2❤🔥1
📨 Получено сообщение! Teacher, you are such a good person, how are you?
😁3
💯
📨 Получено сообщение! You should start a course called “Psychological Advice” or something like that. 😁😁...
It can be worthy and unworthy at the same time. Firstly, would the person you promised to be loyal to appreciate that loyalty? If not, it is better to move on. If that person cares about your loyalty, and you are seeking attention from other people, you are an IDIOT. P.S.: The word "You" wasn't addressed to the person who wrote this message.
😁1
📨 Получено сообщение! do you think attention seeking from new person in ur life is worthy giving up the person whom u promised to be loyal?
😁1
Oʻzizga bogʻliq. Yaxshi oʻquvchi bosez oylar, yaxshi oʻquvchi bomasez century tugul millennium ham kam😁
😁3
📨 Получено сообщение! 7.5+ olish uchun nechi asr ketadi teacherrr
😁1
It depends on the lie, as people lie for many reasons. Mostly, they do not want to feel embarrassed or mocked by their "friends" because of their past. Or they lie to make the conversation interesting 😁 The best way is to talk about it. Ask why he/she lied about his/her past. BE A FRIEND 🧡
😁2
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @ozodbek_skh. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Shodiyev Ozodbek [Shaxsiy]” (@ozodbek_skh), 104 subscribers as measured 14 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ozodbek_skh.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.