#网友投稿 杨平昌(YAN PHANE CHAN), 你是不是被这个人骗了500万,转到我的账户了!!! 我给你的银行账户备注留言了、联系方式,请你看到尽快联系我。 你这笔钱对我有很大的影响!!! 现在我的账户也被冻结了!!!
❤2🔥1

Channel
@oy1ws
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
973subscribers
-2 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1003540102087 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @oy1ws |
| Created | Between 1 December 2025 and 18 May 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 7 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 7 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/oy1ws |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 7 Aug 2026, 14:10 | 973 | -2 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 05:02 | 975 | first reading |
5 posts held, back to 18 May 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 5 posts for this entry, the most recent from 21 May 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
4 reactions across 2 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 75.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 3 | 75.0% | |
| 🔥 | 1 | 25.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 2 of the 5 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 4reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 5 most recent posts we hold, published 18 May 2026 to 21 May 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
#网友投稿 杨平昌(YAN PHANE CHAN), 你是不是被这个人骗了500万,转到我的账户了!!! 我给你的银行账户备注留言了、联系方式,请你看到尽快联系我。 你这笔钱对我有很大的影响!!! 现在我的账户也被冻结了!!!
❤2🔥1
#网友曝光 缅甸人在中国瑞丽打工,好心帮闺蜜找工作、租房、包吃,结果转头和自己老公搞在一起! 一名在中国瑞丽打工的缅甸女子近日发文爆料,自己和老公一起来中国务工时,认识了一名同样来自缅甸、独自在外打工的女子。因为看她一个人在外可怜,便一直把她当亲妹妹照顾。 该女子发原文:👇👇 我们都是缅甸人,一起来中国打工。 这个姑娘不是我的女儿,她父母都在缅甸老家,只有她独自一人来中国打工。 我和老公遇见她,看她孤身在外十分可怜,便一心好心帮助她。她没有工作,我帮她找工作;没有住处,我帮她租房,房租都是我出钱垫付;没钱花,我借钱给她;平日里没饭吃,就天天来我家里吃饭。 我真心实意处处照顾她,有好东西也都会分给她。 没想到我一片好心换来无情对待,她竟然主动勾引我老公,破坏我的家庭。 我心里十分难受,直接提出和老公离婚成全他们,让他们在一起好好过日子,我也不再追究任何事情。 可事后我老公不愿意和她在一起,她也坦言只是随便玩玩,…
❤1
#网友投稿 #老赖 原来在5号地雍景台E栋2楼的主管,外号:老K。 去年8月份找我借了3286U,现在已经过去8个月了,一直没有给我。 当初承诺的是,我随时要,随时能给我。后面一直催,一直说会帮我想办法,反正就是一直不还我。 现在在今晚酒吧色粉公司做通道,现在人已经消失了,飞机注销了,现在直接不还我钱了。 如果不想还的话,也没有事。我会每天曝光你,让所有人看看你是什么样子的人。 后续还会曝光你的一些丑闻,你把我当狗玩,那我也不用再顾及什么了。
#网友投稿 此人有梅毒,是腊戌人。以前在妙瓦底上班认识的,差不多认识两三个月。 然后我们第一次一起睡的时候,没什么问题。后面进去UK园区后,她跟他们主管搞上一起,每晚下班就去他们主管房间做爱,当时我还不知情。我给她发信息也是爱答不理。 过段时间她放假出来外面,我去找她睡觉,做的时候没带套,结果第二天就很痒。我以为是个意外,去医院打个针就好了。然后过了一个星期左右我就有点害怕,就带套了。 后面再过一个月,我以为会没事,就没带套做了,结果就中招了。当时我就觉得前面都好好的为什么会中招?刚好那个时候UK里面也有我朋友,了解UK里面的朋友才知道原因。 后来就跟她提了分手。分手后,她就像个神经一样,我谈个恋爱,她就去造谣一个;谈一个,造谣一个,已经两三年了,一直追着造谣。自己有病不去治,老是来恶心人,看见就想吐,像个疯人。
#曝光 #阿达 #贩卖人口黑心路线 此路线十分不稳定,接人派车十分缓慢‼️ 时常不在约定时间内接人,一等就是半天一天。一共接了三个人,一个因为不在约定时间,并且安置不妥当,被警察带走遣返曼谷,后续无法联系。 两个人已被啊达私下卖掉,还拒不承认,此行为已经涉及贩卖人口。希望警方可以参与调查。 啊达中途一直以路线不通为理由拖延时间,足足拖了三天,说过不了河,后面又以被其他人带走为由,让我们自行承担所有责任与费用。 特此借用平台曝光,各路朋友认清此人,谨慎交易,望众所周知! 并且希望警方参与调查,并且营救我方人员,望各势力以及救援团队可以发挥一些光热!
Showing the 5 most recent of 5 posts we hold for @oy1ws. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 181,300 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 12 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“佤邦吃瓜/勐拉新闻/缅甸内战/老街新闻/缅北曝光/吃瓜群众/每天新闻” (@oy1ws), 973 subscribers as measured 7 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/oy1ws.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.