Channel
@oxioma_jewellery
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
547subscribers
+1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001760687852 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @oxioma_jewellery |
| Created | 26 February 2022 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 8 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 12 October 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/oxioma_jewellery |
Ecommerce storefront — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 21 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Oct 2026, 03:59 | 547 | -1 |
| 1 Oct 2026, 11:55 | 548 | +8 |
| 8 Sept 2026, 18:20 | 540 | +1 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 06:23 | 539 | -4 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 06:34 | 543 | -2 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 03:46 | 545 | no change |
| 8 Aug 2026, 03:02 | 545 | -1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 13:02 | 546 | first reading |
7 posts held, back to 23 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 7 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
25 reactions across 7 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 28.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 7 | 28.0% | |
| 🔥 | 5 | 20.0% | |
| 🎉 | 4 | 16.0% | |
| 😍 | 4 | 16.0% | |
| ❤🔥 | 3 | 12.0% | |
| 👍 | 2 | 8.00% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 7 of the 7 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 25 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 7 most recent posts we hold, published 23 July 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
🎂 Задуваем 8 свечек на торте! Сегодня нашей деточке OXIOMA 8 лет! 🥂✨ Спасибо за то, что разделяете наше чувство прекрасного, и за то, что выбираете нас для самых важных моментов Говорят, в день рождения нужно обязательно загадывать желание. Наше — чтобы красивых и счастливых людей в наших украшениях становилось всё больше Поэтому по традиции, в свой день рождения дарим подарки ВАМ! И в этот раз мы решили сделать ч…
🎉4❤1
💫🔭 Моносерьга Object N9 Какими рождаются цветы в абсолютной тишине космоса? Моносерьга Object N9 — это наша фантазия о внеземной ботанике, где вместо привычной мягкости правит чистая, магнетическая архитектура Мы создали артефакт, напоминающий инопланетный бутон. У него нет уязвимых лепестков — только сложный ажурный каркас. А из сердцевины тянутся длинные струящиеся цепочки, чутко реагирующие на малейшее движение…
🔥2
Нам всегда приятно получать и читать ваши отзывы. Обратная связь помогает нам становиться лучше и понимать, что важно именно для вас В карточках — несколько отзывов с площадки Ozon. Если вы заказывали наши украшения там, спасибо, что находите время и делитесь впечатлениями 💙 А если нет — напомним: OXIOMA есть на Ozon. Удобный заказ в приложении, а также бесплатная доставка до пункта выдачи https://ozon.ru/s/oxioma
👍2
✨NEW✨ Подвеска Юла желаний 🎪 Продолжаем знакомить вас с коллаборацией OXIOMA и художницы Насти Миро Как и кольцо, эта подвеска — интерактивный арт-объект Тот самый праздничный волчок из детства, который напоминает: чудеса случаются. Остановитесь на секунду, покрутите юлу и загадайте заветное желание — оно обязательно сбудется 💫 На фото представлена базовая версия в светлом металле Но прелесть этого украшения в т…
❤🔥3
Приглашаем заглянуть в мастерскую Создание украшения — это долгий путь, требующий максимального внимания к деталям. Мы не стремимся к конвейерной идеальности. Наоборот, нам важно сохранить живой след ручной работы и авторскую уникальность Надеемся, вы чувствуете это каждый раз, когда надеваете украшения OXIOMA✨
🔥3❤2
✨ У каждой из нас своя эстетика, свои любимые цвета и свой стиль. Современная царевна сама решает, какой ей быть Именно поэтому серьги Царевна-Лебедь существуют в разных вариантах Мы соединили разные оттенки металла и ювелирной эмали, чтобы идеальная пара нашлась для каждой https://www.oxioma.ru/store
😍4
🌊 Говорят, русалки прячут они свои сокровища в самых тихих, согретых солнцем реках Сюда не приходят с сетями. Чтобы река поделилась своими дарами, нужны лишь вера в чудо и немного терпения. Зачерпнешь прозрачной воды — а в руках остается настоящее волшебство ✨ Надеваем и чувствуем себя частью этой сказки 🤍
❤4
Showing the 7 most recent of 7 posts we hold for @oxioma_jewellery. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“OXIOMA jewellery” (@oxioma_jewellery), 547 subscribers as measured 12 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/oxioma_jewellery.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.