Channel
@owokhairii
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
580subscribers
-11 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001400430928 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @owokhairii |
| Created | Between 1 September 2018 and 18 September 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 6 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 14 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/owokhairii |
Gaming — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 21 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 98% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 14 Sept 2026, 18:19 | 580 | -5 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 10:33 | 585 | -2 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 08:44 | 587 | -3 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 01:07 | 590 | -1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 08:48 | 591 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 08:26 | 591 | first reading |
19 posts held, back to 18 September 2021 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 25 January 2022. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
159 reactions across 11 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 44.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 71 | 44.7% | |
| 😢 | 30 | 18.9% | |
| 😁 | 21 | 13.2% | |
| ❤ | 10 | 6.29% | |
| 🤩 | 10 | 6.29% | |
| 😱 | 8 | 5.03% | |
| 🔥 | 6 | 3.77% | |
| 🎉 | 3 | 1.89% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 11 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 159 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 18 September 2021 to 25 January 2022, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
I'll stop posting stuffs on this channel starting today since i'm just too busy in real life. I also thought about restricting @owochats but yall sharing stuffs and chatting each other, so i'll just let it be like that. If yall looking for good ESP, just check out @theFQRS. their non-root version is paid but rooted one is free to use. See yall next time, thanks for staying.
👍32😢22❤7🤩6😱5🎉3
Signed Nako Sunao
If still not work, use v13.0 version. Aternatively, don't use this buggy ccaster and use any other stable ESP instead smh
👍13❤3🔥2
Signed Nako Sunao
Valorant kok mobile 😂 Hyper Front is out for Southeast Asia if yall want to try
Signed Nako Sunao
Dear Subscribers This is to inform you, that my cracked version won't face this shitty server problem 😂
😁21👍4🔥4🤩4
Signed Nako Sunao
A lot of stuffs is broken on new ccaster because he uses old version of ccaster and simply add new values to it. Some weapons, new items, vehicles are pretty much broken at this point 😂 Just move on and look for better alternatives.
👍2
Signed Nako Sunao
basically @ccasteresp v13.0 cracked/bypass login 🤷♀️ @owokhairii
👍8😢8😱2
Signed Nako Sunao
basically @ccasteresp v12.1 cracked/bypass login 🤷♀️ @owokhairii "fixed BGMI and Taiwan"
👍5
Signed Nako Sunao
ccaster released "fixed crash" version on his website, but i don't think something changed really, here it is anyways. basically @ccasteresp v12 cracked/bypass login 🤷 @owokhairii
😱1
Signed Nako Sunao
ccaster crashes? use original ccaster. if still crashes, then it's not my fault. tell @ccasteresp's @jairathsingh about it.
👍2
Signed Nako Sunao
oh, no credit too, feel free to steal
Signed Nako Sunao
basically @ccasteresp v12 cracked/bypass login 🤷♀️ @owokhairii posted this one because everyone else's version is low quality shit. note that this one doesn't have fixed android 11, fixed item esp and better enemy weapons, i'll do it if i have free time. note : i'm retired, so stop asking stuffs.
👍3
Signed Nako Sunao
i already retired from modding 😂 i see alot of channels share their modded ccaster v12, but you know what? they're all shit, unsurprisingly so yeah, i'll send my version here as a prime example.
Signed Nako Sunao
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @owokhairii. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@owokhairii named 2 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“OwO” (@owokhairii), 580 subscribers as measured 14 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/owokhairii.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.