Кстати да 👀 (Я потом вас накормлю от себя в том числе, пока что так)
custom 52562456633472551321custom 53751812620529387681

Channel
@oviksqwas
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
1subscribers
-142 since we began measuring on 10 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001844475385 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @oviksqwas |
| Created | Between 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 10 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 16 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 3 times, most recently 16 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/oviksqwas |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 1 Sept 2026, 08:53 | 1 | -141 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 05:53 | 142 | -1 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 20:30 | 143 | no change |
| 10 Aug 2026, 20:17 | 143 | first reading |
15 posts held, back to 19 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 15 posts for this entry, the most recent from 10 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
245 reactions across 14 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 32.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5375316789745958327 | 80 | 32.7% | |
| custom 5256245663347255132 | 46 | 18.8% | |
| custom 5210882055558153474 | 40 | 16.3% | |
| custom 5307586143330514066 | 29 | 11.8% | |
| custom 5309977654135374142 | 20 | 8.16% | |
| custom 5375181262052938768 | 19 | 7.76% | |
| 🕊 | 11 | 4.49% |
Custom emoji. 6 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 15 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 245 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 19 July 2026 to 10 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Кстати да 👀 (Я потом вас накормлю от себя в том числе, пока что так)
custom 52562456633472551321custom 53751812620529387681
я непомню постила коммишность или нет...
custom 53753167897459583277
Локалка из одного чата по Дилюкофикации (помогите) #sketch
custom 537531678974595832714custom 53751812620529387681
Какие работы вам больше нравятся от меня?
The shares total 218%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Извиняться не буду #sketch #Ovluc(??)
custom 537531678974595832717custom 53075861433305140667custom 52562456633472551325
Пивной немец скачать картинка.png ...и раз такая ещё свитопляка была то вот. За одно мотивация появилась пробовать лучше рисовать полных людей в будущем, спасибо Юрец за это хоть Хотела до полноценки дотянуть, но не вышло. Ещё умудрилась после отпуска заболеть 🍒
custom 530758614333051406615custom 537531678974595832713custom 53099776541353741425
Думайте
custom 52562456633472551327custom 52108820555581534743
Картинка со звуком.png
🕊11custom 52562456633472551326custom 53751812620529387683
Как вам моя деградация в рисунках от 1 до 10 (ладно-ладно, шучу, наверное)
custom 53753167897459583277
🤩🤩🤩🤩 🤩🤩🤩 😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀 Приехали наконец-то акриловые маркеры, вновь пытаюсь вспомнить как ими пользоваться.. Как в целом рисовать #traditionalart #стыдпозор
custom 537531678974595832715custom 521088205555815347412custom 53751812620529387687custom 53075861433305140662
И немного глупостей с этим скином, так скажем выгул был
custom 53099776541353741428
🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩 Да-да не удивляйтесь, вновь для себя рисую #рб
custom 53753167897459583276custom 52108820555581534742custom 53751812620529387681
Showing the 12 most recent of 15 posts we hold for @oviksqwas. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Какие работы вам больше нравятся от меня?
The shares total 218%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 19 July 2026 to 10 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 1 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“.” (@oviksqwas), 1 subscribers as measured 1 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/oviksqwas.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.