Channel
@overview_nft
On this record: Topic · Observations · Channels linked by matching posts · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
59subscribers
-120 since we began measuring on 11 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001249094535 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @overview_nft |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 31 August 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 11 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 5 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 11 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 5 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/overview_nft |
Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 28 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 84% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.
Posts published here appear in near-verbatim form on 1 other registered channel. This entry also sits inside a group of 3 channels linked by matching posts, directly or through other channels in the group; two members of the group may share no posts with each other. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.
| Posted first | Then | Overlap | Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| @Novosti_NFT/12428 Jul 2026, 07:52 UTC | @overview_nft/965 · this entry8 Jul 2026, 07:52 UTC | 1.00 | under a minute |
| @overview_nft/966 · this entry10 Jul 2026, 04:53 UTC | @Novosti_NFT/124310 Jul 2026, 04:53 UTC | 1.00 | under a minute |
| @overview_nft/968 · this entry14 Jul 2026, 06:37 UTC | @Novosti_NFT/124514 Jul 2026, 06:37 UTC | 1.00 | under a minute |
| @Novosti_NFT/124616 Jul 2026, 06:16 UTC | @overview_nft/969 · this entry16 Jul 2026, 06:16 UTC | 1.00 | under a minute |
| @overview_nft/970 · this entry18 Jul 2026, 07:24 UTC | @Novosti_NFT/124718 Jul 2026, 07:24 UTC | 1.00 | under a minute |
| Channel | Matching posts | Text overlap | Typical gap | Published first |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| @Novosti_NFT | 5 (5/5 hand-verifiable sample passed) | 1.00 | under a minute | @Novosti_NFT (3–2) |
Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.
What this cannot establish
MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.
Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. None of the 3 matches recorded here fall after that date, so for this entry we cannot say whether any of them carried a credit. The duplication is measured; the absence of attribution is not.
“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 17 comparable posts for this entry, running 29 June 2026 to 11 August 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.
The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.
Of the group of 3 channels, the one whose matching posts we hold earliest is @Novosti_NFT. That is a statement about our reading window, not a claim of authorship.
Recorded under the key clone_mutual, last confirmed 11 November 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.
This channel is in a group of 3 registered channels linked by matching posts, directly or through other channels in the group. This channel may share no posts with some of the channels listed below, and listed channels may share none with each other. Links are found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register.
Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown in this list. “First” could only mean first in our own crawl, which depends on how deep we happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. Our one hand-check read 45 of the highest-confidence flagged pairs against the live Telegram pages. In 18 of them the live page showed a “Forwarded from” credit that our database had no record of, so reading that pair as an unattributed copy was wrong; the check did not measure who published first. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Near-verbatim matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 5 Nov 2026, 14:10 | 59 | -1 |
| 22 Oct 2026, 08:07 | 60 | -3 |
| 14 Oct 2026, 06:28 | 63 | -4 |
| 6 Oct 2026, 04:20 | 67 | -5 |
| 25 Sept 2026, 19:38 | 72 | -33 |
| 12 Sept 2026, 00:20 | 105 | -14 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 06:38 | 119 | -15 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 22:48 | 134 | -19 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 02:57 | 153 | -25 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 12:16 | 178 | -1 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 10:47 | 179 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 29 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 11 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Майнеры работают в убыток – знак, что мы где-то возле самого дна ⛏ Почти четверть всех асиков (22,7%) работает в минус. При этом цена отключения (когда даже самое энергоэффективное железо является убыточным) составляет около $46 787. 🤔 Что это значит для рынка: Майнеры отключают фермы и продают остатки BTC, чтобы закрыть долги, создавая временное давление на цену. Но дальше по цепочке: хешрейт летит вниз, сеть сниж…
🎣 Фишинговый сайт Trezor вчера оказался первым рекламным результатом в Google и маскировался под официальный сервис. После массовых жалоб объявление удалили.
Исследователь заявил, что за 22 месяца нашёл следы северокорейских хакеров в системах 1640 организаций из 57 стран, причём в сотнях случаев речь могла идти о полном доступе к серверам, облакам и ключам. Чаще всего атака начиналась с фальшивого собеседования — кандидату предлагали запустить «тестовый проект», который незаметно устанавливал бэкдор и крал данные, криптокошельки и доступы.
Что там по рынку? ▫️ Вторник встречает нас небольшим отскоком: биткоин поднялся к $63,700–63,800, прибавив около 0.4% за последние сутки. Эфир торгуется у $1,875, демонстрируя слабую динамику, а альткойны остаются в боковике. Индекс страха и жадности застрял на 27–28 — зона страха сохраняется, хотя рынок и пытается выйти из экстремумов. Переговоры США с Ираном пока дают надежду на деэскалацию, но биткоин не спешит …
Trump Media предположительно продала еще 2628 BTC (~$165 млн). В сентябре 2025 года стоящая за социальной платформой Truth Social компания купила 11 542 BTC по средней цене $118 522. Примерно семь месяцев назад Trump Media начала ликвидировать биткоин-резерв и суммарно реализовала 7281 BTC в среднем по $74 855. Фирма еще удерживает 4 261 BTC (~$269 млн), а ее совокупные потери на цифровом золоте достигают $555 млн,…
💸 Coinbase провалила квартал, получив $360 000 000 чистого убытка — хуже прогнозов оказались почти все ключевые направления. Армстронг уверяет, что бизнес уже не зависит от цены биткоина, но рынок пока не поверил — акции просели на 5% после отчёта.
😢 Я высиживаю лонг до идеальной точки фиксации...
Утро в крипте начинается уже не с кофе, а с очередного взлома — Triple-A потеряла $10 000 000 из-за хакерской атаки. Похоже, ежедневный эксплойт окончательно стал частью рыночной рутины.
🦅 Центробанк РФ рассказал, как будет работать обмен криптовалюты на ценные бумаги: 🔵 Менять можно будет на любые российские ценные бумаги (акции, облигации, паи инвестфондов). 🔵 Сделки пойдут через брокеров или обменники. 🔵 Расчёты проведут через обычный и цифровой депозитарии. 🔵 Обменивать разрешат и иностранные стейблкоины (USDT, USDC) 🔵 Публичные предложения таких сделок запретят.
Цифры за последний цикл заставляют полностью пересмотреть подход к формированию портфеля. Вот как изменилась стоимость активов от сентября 2023 года до октября 2025 года и их текущее падение: 🟠 BNB +535% на максимуме → сейчас упал на ≈56% 🔵 Акции Coinbase +440% на максимуме → сейчас упали ≈59% 🥇 Биткоин +382% на максимуме → сейчас упал ≈48% ✨ Эфириум +161% на максимуме → сейчас упал на ≈55% Кажется, мы не совсем…
Сжигание подарков на $1 000 000 😣 На одном из аккаунтов заморозились (читай – были навсегда утеряны) более 100 000 коллекционных подарков. Суммарная оценочная стоимость этой коллекции по рыночным меркам превышала $1 млн 🔭 Пока непонятно, что произошло на самом деле. Есть три основные версии: 🔵 Аккаунт забанили 🔵 Владелец сам удалил его, чтобы создать дефицит на рынке 🔵 Или это временное скрытие профиля Если удал…
🔣Bitwise: криптовалюты упали на 36% в первом полугодии 2026, зато связанные акции выросли на 23% 🔣 Стратег Morgan Stanley: SOL исторически лучше диверсифицирует портфель, чем ETH Корреляция BTC-SOL ниже, чем BTC-ETH, и SOL меньше коррелирует с традиционными активами при расхождении с биткоином.
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @overview_nft. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 5 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“NFT Метавселенная” (@overview_nft), 59 subscribers as measured 5 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/overview_nft.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.