Channel
@overtooon
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
134subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 10 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1003759445310 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @overtooon |
| Created | Between 1 February 2026 and 7 March 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 10 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 10 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 10 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/overtooon |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 10 Aug 2026, 08:50 | 134 | no change |
| 10 Aug 2026, 00:47 | 134 | first reading |
8 posts held, back to 7 March 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 8 posts for this entry, the most recent from 14 May 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
103 reactions across 8 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 48.5% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 50 | 48.5% | |
| 🔥 | 22 | 21.4% | |
| ❤🔥 | 11 | 10.7% | |
| 🤯 | 9 | 8.74% | |
| 👏 | 6 | 5.83% | |
| 🤔 | 2 | 1.94% | |
| 👍 | 1 | 0.971% | |
| 🤬 | 1 | 0.971% | |
| 🥰 | 1 | 0.971% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 8 of the 8 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 103reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 8 most recent posts we hold, published 7 March 2026 to 14 May 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
АХАХАХАХХАХАХАХА! Это я смеюсь над всеми, кто думал, что мы пропали😎 Наша команда учла все ваши пожелания и недочеты… и готовит для вас кое-что интересное! Каждая реакция и каждый комментарий приближает второе препати OVERTOOON. Если вы хотите поучаствовать, выступить, предложить идею - пишите в лс @mreffecto
🤯9❤1🤬1
Кого бы вы снова хотели послушать на апрельском OVERTOOON? Пишите в комментариях!
❤8🔥2
Не забыли наши слова? Мы только начинаем🔥 Уже готовы к следующей буре?..
❤10
Когда мы задумали OVERTOOON, у нас появился простой вопрос: а кто наша аудитория? Мы про рок, про рэп, про электронику? Или просто собрали всех подряд? Существует концепция окна Овертона. Мы не будем вдаваться в детали, но суть в том, что концепции, которые сначала кажутся чуждыми, со временем становятся привычными. В музыке и тусовках также: сперва был металл и рэп, которые как будто должны стоять по разные стороны…
❤9👏4🔥4
Ребята, вопрос???? Мы уже определились с новым местом для следующей вечеринки-препати, но хочется узнать ваши мысли. Возможно вы знаете какое-то место, где было бы классно собраться в следующий раз, может быть какой-то неочевидный бар, или необычное пространство с атмосферой, которая близка нашему духу. Хотим вдохновиться вашими идеями и удивить вас, поэтому делитесь любыми, даже самыми сумасшедшими. Будем благодар…
❤6🤔2
Ребята, вот и прошла уже неделя, и мы снова врываемся в работу, чтобы сделать следующее зубодробительное препати. МУЗЫКАНТЫ! Хотите выступить? Или знаете исполнителей, которых нам стоит позвать? Пишите в личку @mreffecto Кидайте ссылки на записи, демки, ютуб. Послушаем внимательно. Если почувствуем, что совпадаем по энергии и вайбу — обязательно позовём. Если нет — не обижайтесь, мы просто хотим собрать тех, кто н…
🔥8❤2
Ребята, было жарко! В первую очередь хочу отблагодарить всех, кто был на мероприятии, слэмился, отжигал и поддерживал нас! Это было наше первое пре-пати, были недочеты, которые мы учтем, но в общем все прошло весело, шумно и с душой! Пишите под этим постом ваши впечатления, скидывайте видео и фото, давайте сделаем следующий фест ещё громче, ярче и эмоциональнее!
❤14🔥8👏2❤🔥1👍1🥰1
Video message, posted without a caption
❤🔥10
Showing the 8 most recent of 8 posts we hold for @overtooon. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 904,164 of 1,176,251entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“OVERTOOON” (@overtooon), 134 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/overtooon.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.