Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Оверперформящий кукис

@overperforming

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

64subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001325928696
TypeChannel
Username@overperforming
DescriptionХай гайз, пуште ваши пикчи в этого бота @performing_cookies_bot
Created24 June 2019measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (TGDataset)
First recorded10 August 2026
Last confirmed live14 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/overperforming

Growth

646 August 2026 — 64 subscribers10 August 2026 — 64 subscribers6 August 202610 August 2026
2 measurements spanning 4 days. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 63–65 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
10 Aug 2026, 02:4664no change
6 Aug 2026, 13:3064first reading

Engagement

19 posts held, back to 3 August 2019the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 29 October 2020. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Photos
49
Links
2

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 10 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Recent posts

29 Oct 2020, 07:48 UTC500 viewsread 10 August 2026
Photo

https://www.avito.ru/moskva/drugie_zhivotnye/mini-pig_2003961849

22 Jan 2020, 09:53 UTC747 viewsread 10 August 2026
Photo

Всем гирлам кто хочет апнуть скилы, не тупите, джойнитесь к чисто женским ивентам.

6 Nov 2019, 06:18 UTC227 viewsread 10 August 2026
Forwarded from @theaftertimesPhoto

Запомните, есть только два гендера!

2 Oct 2019, 09:38 UTC487 viewsread 10 August 2026
Photo

Очень круто. Ждем добавления в меню pre-work амфетамин

12 Sept 2019, 11:26 UTC284 viewsread 10 August 2026

Хороший пост про код-ревью, но блядь, спеллчекер и сорян яж не нейтив спикер это ведь клиника уже, необратимые последствия для мозга. Я понял почему до него коллега докапывается - похоже что приведение кода, документации и письменной речи к единому виду это не про него (пользы от этого не много).

12 Sept 2019, 11:26 UTC115 viewsread 10 August 2026

Программисты... они как-то очень трепетно относятся к своему коду. Это ж плод мысли, усилий интеллектуальных (и немножко yaml конфигов и копипасты со Stack Overflow). Ясен хуй, что критика кода воспринимается как личный выпад. Отсюда все эти обиды и конфликты во время код-ревью. Мне в гуглоформу относительно регулярно пишут про "плохие" и "токсичные" ревью, про синдром вахтёра у коллег. Так что тема больная. На сам

Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @overperforming. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Оверперформящий кукис” (@overperforming), 64 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/overperforming.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.