Video, posted without a caption
🔥4🤣1🆒1

Channel
@overbreak
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
237subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001161908335 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @overbreak |
| Description | Подпольное вещание группы OVERBREAK |
| Created | Between 1 April 2018 and 31 July 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 8 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/overbreak |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 8 Aug 2026, 10:00 | 237 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 15:46 | 237 | first reading |
19 posts held, back to 17 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 12 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
292 reactions across 19 posts, in 15 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 37.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5370971163310693562 | 108 | 37.0% | |
| 🔥 | 91 | 31.2% | |
| ❤ | 39 | 13.4% | |
| 🤣 | 21 | 7.19% | |
| 🆒 | 5 | 1.71% | |
| 👍 | 5 | 1.71% | |
| 😍 | 5 | 1.71% | |
| 😡 | 4 | 1.37% | |
| 👏 | 3 | 1.03% | |
| 🎉 | 2 | 0.685% | |
| 😢 | 2 | 0.685% | |
| 🤔 | 2 | 0.685% | |
| 🤩 | 2 | 0.685% | |
| 🤯 | 2 | 0.685% | |
| 😎 | 1 | 0.342% |
Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it isTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 292reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 17 June 2026 to 12 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Video, posted without a caption
🔥4🤣1🆒1
Начинаем через 10 минут 💀
🔥4😎1custom 53709711633106935621
OVB Nation, завтра в 20.30 по Москве залетайте на стрим. Будем общаться и отвечать на вопросы 💀
🔥5❤2custom 53709711633106935622🤩1
OVERBREAK: «Мы дадим этому миру горячий саундтрек, каким бы ни был его исход» #interview Ростовская сцена всегда славилась своей абразивной бескомпромиссностью, но четвертый альбом группы OVERBREAK «OSNOVA» вывел эту оголтелую ярость на совершенно новый уровень. Мы подробно пообщались с барабанщиком и лидером коллектива Даниилом. О новом альбоме, невошедших треках, бумер-шутерах, отношении к хардкору и не только чит…
❤4🔥3custom 53709711633106935622
Интервью с лидером OVERBREAK для паблика Мертвых собак лай. Много про новый альбом, жизнь и потери. Читать: https://vk.cc/cZnpD7
🔥6custom 53709711633106935623❤2
OVB Nation, хотите секрет? Что общего между подземными Overbreak и известной группой Бонд с кнопкой? Глубокое видение творчества и структуры звука. Отвечает за это Николай Ковалевский, который является саундпродюсером обоих команд. Сумасшедший свирепый звук Основы — результат его большого труда. Это стадионный саунд, идеально подходящий для бумер-шутеров. То, что разносит голову как хэдшот из здоровенного дробовика…
custom 537097116331069356211👍5🔥5🆒1
Бэкстейдж с записи песни OVERBREAK — Kolokola Слушать здесь: https://band.link/ovb_osnova
🤣7🤔2🤯2
Обновление нашего кураторского плейлиста с новинками! #playlist Стая, продолжаем для вас отслеживать интересные новинки из мира музыки и пополнять ими наш плейлист с новинками. В этот раз мы добавили треки от Тома Йорка, Нотэбёрд, rats in paradise и не только. Сохраняйте плейлист на удобной для вас площадке (VK, Яндекс.Музыка или Spotify), а регулярные обновления уже за нами. Ну и не забывайте рассказывать об этом…
🔥4😍2custom 53709711633106935622
Оружие массового поражения. Несколько лет назад ростовчане Overbreak отошли от битдаун хардкора в сторону куда более разнообразных жанров и не прогадали. Саунд группы, хоть и сохранил в себе элементы прошлого звучания, стал резче, бронебойнее и, банально, интереснее. И в этом плане, на «Osnova», четвёртой пластинке коллектива, квинтет продолжает вгрызаться в землю, решительно двигаясь вперёд. Каждая композиция здес…
custom 53709711633106935627🔥5❤2😍1
Какой трек с альбома понравился больше остальных? Вы имеете право высказать мнение в посте по ссылке https://vk.ru/wall-77043040_13003
❤3🔥3custom 53709711633106935622
Извиняемся за обложку? Наконец, на второй день после релиза, наш "экран смерти" получил свою обратную связь 😈
🤣13
Создать Основу и наконец все понять. В мире музыки есть понятие "терапевтический альбом". Когда автор делится своей болью и вроде как освобождается от него. Так делали Эминем, Майк Шинода и еще много кто. У нас другое видение. Освободиться от тяжкого груза можно не только через признание уязвимости. Но и через решительность выжить и сделать мир лучше, чего бы это не стоило. О том Основа. Не бойся быть сильным, при…
custom 537097116331069356211🔥8😢2🎉1🆒1
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @overbreak. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 185,878 of 1,480,688entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“OVERBREAK” (@overbreak), 237 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/overbreak.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.