Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Over river - про стартапы, метрики, финансы

@over_river

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

1,585subscribers

+2 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001983922099
TypeChannel
Username@over_river
CreatedBetween 1 April 2023 and 31 October 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/over_river

Growth

1,5821,5851,583.56 August 2026 — 1,583 subscribers6 August 2026 — 1,583 subscribers9 August 2026 — 1,582 subscribers12 August 2026 — 1,585 subscribers6 August 202612 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 6 days, net +2. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,582–1,585 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 00:531,585+3
9 Aug 2026, 09:521,582-1
6 Aug 2026, 11:501,583no change
6 Aug 2026, 09:371,583first reading

Engagement

13 posts held, back to 13 April 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
21.9%
avg views ÷ 1,585 subscribers
Avg views / post
348
4 posts measured
Reaction rate
5.25%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
4
of 13 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026
Posts held13 (13 April 20266 August 2026)
Views total1,391
Reactions total73
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Aug 2026, 17:59 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

193 reactions across 13 posts, in 12 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 34.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥6734.7%
6131.6%
👍189.33%
😁136.74%
115.70%
👏105.18%
🤮73.63%
🤝21.04%
🍾10.518%
🕊10.518%
😍10.518%
🙏10.518%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 13 of the 13 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 193reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 13 most recent posts we hold, published 13 April 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

6 Aug 2026, 06:28 UTC197 views9 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Делюсь: самый ультимативный хак при работе с клодом - написать ему привет, когда просыпаешься, чтобы запустить 5 часовой лимит ;) by @over_river

😁5👏3🔥1

4 Aug 2026, 09:25 UTC282 views20 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Я десять лет копаюсь в 💩 метриках стартапов. MRR, churn, ARPU, LTV/CAC. Всё красиво считается и есть с чем сравнить. Только это метрики под Saas. А ребята, с кем я работал / работаю продают вообще не всегда софт. Металл, музыку, логистику, физические штуки со склада, яхты. И каждый раз одно и то же: садишься считать эффективность, а метрики под этот бизнес пока не придумали ( или придумали, но я пока не знаю). Прих

🔥1422👍1😍1

27 Jul 2026, 08:39 UTC497 views24 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Вот примерно так выглядит кризис по контенту: 2 месяца без единого поста. Не хватает фокуса и сил. За два месяца конечно у меня успелись начаться и завершиться 7 проектов, я пожил в монастыре в горных джунглях, много летал, вкусно кушал. А вот посты написать - было уже выше моих сил. Что кстати вам помогает держать фокус и не расплываться по разным делам? Какие рутины? Ежедневники? и второй вопрос Про что интерес

11😁8👏3👍1🕊1

27 May 2026, 05:35 UTC853 views18 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Нашел классный разбор деки Concorda из Speedrun в формате до и после коротко: - позиционирование должно быть глобальным по вайбу, но в то же время очень таргетированным - слайд с командой это не про опыт и шильдики, а про ваше конкурентное преимущество - проблема очень важна (!) По слайдам: вообще сделали дорого богато как видите. стиль и брендовое позиционирование важно 1 / Титульник. было «Agentic AI for Comple

🔥742👍2👏2🙏1

26 May 2026, 13:10 UTC562 views12 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Предприниматели, предпринимайте💵

6🔥3🤝2👍1

26 May 2026, 09:40 UTC582 views13 reactionsread 7 August 2026

🙈 Мы как то просрали теплое интро в тир 1 фонд. Потому что плохо сделали домашнюю работу. Мы попросили интро в классный фонд, но не к тому парнеру. в результате запороли и встречу и подвели человека, который это интро сделал. Так что делайте домашнюю работу и изучайте партнеров, с которыми собираетесь говорить или на которых планируете делать аутрич. благо есть промпты и сеточки. I'm preparing to reach out to [PART

7🔥51

19 May 2026, 15:55 UTC719 views16 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

сейчас все обсуждают ребрендинг спотифая, который решил просто хайпануть. А вы вообще видели новые иноки от гугла? норм или стрем

🔥8🤮7👍1

18 May 2026, 14:09 UTC682 views23 reactionsread 7 August 2026
File

В пятницу выступал в Ташкенте на техвике. Рассказывал про то, во что превращаются VC. Ниже тезисы, остальное - в деке Итого 3 большие модели: Platform Fund. Фонд с операционными командами вокруг чека. У a16z это recruiters с базой 50K+ vetted operators, GTM-команда с интро в Fortune 500, маркетинг и подкаст-сеть, policy-офис в DC, sector research, programs для founders. Почему: founders на $20M раунде не ищут mone

🔥148👏1

18 May 2026, 14:09 UTC461 views5 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

2🔥2👏1

4 May 2026, 06:51 UTC831 views15 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Ребятки, я знаю - давно тишина. Много работы, мало внимания моим дорогим подписчикам. Каюсь, исправляюсь. [еще раз] как рассказывать про выручку, и что будет полным зашкваром Тема, на которой 90% фаундеров фачат коммуникацию с инвесторами. Натягивают сову на глобус, чтобы цифра выглядела пожирнее. Любой нормальный VC палит это за полминуты, и дальше уже не про деньги разговор, а про то, можно ли тебе вообще доверять

7🔥6👍2

21 Apr 2026, 07:43 UTC660 views11 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Тут посмотрел подкаст про то, как появился рынок секондариз. улет. Для вас перевел транскрипт в своем стиле. 233 млрд. Столько в 2025-м был рынок секондариз. Больше, чем NYSE и Nasdaq раздали через IPO. Что там было: — Срок от основания до IPO вырос с 6 лет до 14. Инженер пришёл в стартап в 28, к 42 у него опционы, ипотека, дети в школе и ноль ликвидности. — Figma, CoreWeave и Klarna вышли в 2025-м. Figma минус 80%

7🔥3🍾1

Showing the 12 most recent of 13 posts we hold for @over_river. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 993,995 of 1,340,412entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Over river - про стартапы, метрики, финансы” (@over_river), 1,585 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/over_river.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.