Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Outil IA

Channel

Outil IA

@outil_ia

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

193subscribers

-3 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003988543895
TypeChannel
Username@outil_ia
CreatedBetween 1 April 2026 and 2 May 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live2 November 2026
Measurements held7
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 2 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/outil_ia

Topic

Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 24 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 98% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

193196194.58 August 2026 — 196 subscribers8 August 2026 — 196 subscribers9 September 2026 — 194 subscribers17 September 2026 — 196 subscribers2 October 2026 — 195 subscribers25 October 2026 — 194 subscribers2 November 2026 — 193 subscribers8 August 20262 November 2026
7 measurements spanning 86 days, net -3. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 193–196 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
2 Nov 2026, 04:40193-1
25 Oct 2026, 19:47194-1
2 Oct 2026, 06:36195-1
17 Sept 2026, 16:02196+2
9 Sept 2026, 21:02194-2
8 Aug 2026, 11:46196no change
8 Aug 2026, 00:00196first reading

Engagement

17 posts held, back to 2 May 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 17 posts for this entry, the most recent from 5 June 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

40 reactions across 11 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 35.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤1435.0%
🔥1332.5%
👍615.0%
👏410.0%
🙏37.50%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 11 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 40 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 2 May 2026 to 5 June 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

5 Jun 2026, 15:57 UTC≈2,070 views5 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

🥇 Analyse IA du jour : GOLD (XAUUSD) 📊 Verdict des IA : ✅ POUR : 58% ❌ CONTRE : 42% 🚨 L’or vient de perdre beaucoup de terrain. Et c’est souvent à ce moment-là que beaucoup de traders font la même erreur : ils voient une grosse baisse… ils pensent que “ça va forcément remonter”… et ils cliquent trop vite sur BUY. Sauf que les IA ne valident pas le trade aussi facilement. Oui, le BUY commence à devenir intéressa…

❤3🔥1🙏1

Signed Kylian Marlier

28 May 2026, 14:55 UTC≈2,180 views4 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Analyse 36 IA du jour : Bitcoin (BTCUSD) 📊 Verdict des modèles : ✅ POUR : 61% (22 IA) ❌ CONTRE : 39% (14 IA) 🚨 Ce qui est intéressant ici : Les 36 IA ne donnent pas un “oui” aveugle alors que le bitcoin plonge. Elles penchent pour la vente, mais avec un avis intelligent et nuancé. Pourquoi ? Parce que techniquement, le Bitcoin montre encore plusieurs signaux baissiers : MACD orienté à la baisse, ADX fort, prix…

👍3🔥1

Signed Kylian Marlier

26 May 2026, 12:38 UTC≈1,530 viewsread 8 August 2026
Photo

🚨 Résultat GOLD grâce à l'outil : +14 876€ de bénéfice 🚨 Oui, tu as bien lu. +14 876€ affichés sur le compte grâce à une série de trades validés et structurés par les 36 IA. Mais le plus important, ce n’est pas juste le gain. C’est la façon de décider. Aujourd’hui, tu n’es plus obligé de prendre tes trades seul, au feeling, avec le doute au moment de cliquer. Avec l’outil IA, tu peux faire vérifier ton trade ava…

Signed Kylian Marlier

25 May 2026, 11:22 UTC≈1,430 viewsread 8 August 2026
Photo

🚨 Mise à jour importante de l’outil IA 🚨 Les places au tarif de lancement sont maintenant fermées. On a gardé l’accès ouvert, mais les prix ont été mis à jour ! Désormais, tu peux accéder à l’outil via un abonnement mensuel : 👉 18 IA pour faire vérifier tes trades rapidement 👉 36 IA pour une analyse encore plus complète Le but reste le même : Ne plus trader seul et faire analyser ton trade avant de le placer. 💡 …

Signed Kylian Marlier

24 May 2026, 12:32 UTC≈1,290 views3 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Analyse 36 IA du jour : Or (XAUUSD) 📊 Verdict des modèles : ✅ POUR : 61% (22 IA) ❌ CONTRE : 39% (14 IA) 🚨 Pourquoi c’est une analyse EXCELLENTE de la part des 36 IA ? Car on voit bien que malgré le contexte baissier sur l'or, il faut faire attention à comment on l'aborde ! Elles voient bien que le contexte technique reste plutôt favorable à une vente sur l’or : MACD baissier, pression vendeuse, ADX fort et un rat…

❤1🔥1🙏1

Signed Kylian Marlier

20 May 2026, 12:36 UTC≈1,470 views4 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Analyse 36 IA du jour : Bitcoin (BTCUSD) 📊 Verdict des modèles : ✅ POUR : 56% (20 IA) ❌ CONTRE : 44% (16 IA) 🚨 Pourquoi c'est une analyse EXCELLENTE de la part des 36 IA ? Car on voit clairement que le graphique en H4 est toujours en tendance baissière, sous sa SM200. Cependant, on voit à court terme un rebond haussier qui nous laisserais vouloir acheter. Hors, ce n'est pas encore le bon moment car les prix sont t…

🔥2❤1🙏1

Signed Kylian Marlier

19 May 2026, 11:31 UTC≈1,510 views4 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Analyse IA du jour : GOLD (XAUUSD) L’outil vient d’analyser un trade VENTE sur l’or avec les 36 IA. 📊 Verdict des modèles : ✅ POUR : 89% (32 IA) ❌ CONTRE : 11% (4 IA) 🚨 Les IA penchent fortement pour un scénario baissier sur l’or : 👉 La tendance actuelle reste favorable à la baisse 👉 Les prix sont sous la SMA200 période 👉 La majorité des IA valide l’idée d’un trade vendeur 👉 Zone de support importante à court ter…

👍2❤1🔥1

Signed Kylian Marlier

16 May 2026, 10:58 UTC≈1,800 viewsread 8 August 2026
Photo

⭐️ On vient de dépasser la barre des 500 avis vérifiés sur Trustpilot ⭐️ Et franchement, ça fait plaisir de voir que l’outil vous aide réellement à mieux analyser vos trades, à éviter des trades perdants et à augmenter le nombre de trades gagnants. Ça change toute votre rentabilité et c'est exactement pour ça que j'ai créé cet outil. Pour ceux qui ont testé l’outil et dont l’essai est terminé, l’accès n’est plus ac…

Signed Kylian Marlier

14 May 2026, 11:34 UTC934 viewsread 8 August 2026

🧠 Ton prochain trade, ne le prends pas seul. Hier, j’ai ouvert l’accès gratuit à l’outil pendant 24h pour que chacun puisse tester l’analyse par IA. Le principe est simple : Tu envoies ton trade avec : 📍 PE 🎯 TP 🛑 SL Et l’outil te donne un avis clair avec plusieurs IA : ✅ cohérence du setup ⚠️ niveau de risque 📊 ratio gain / perte 🤖 verdict global POUR / CONTRE Le but n’est pas de trader à ta place. Le but, c’e…

Signed Kylian Marlier

12 May 2026, 07:44 UTC≈1,810 views3 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Poll

👀 Avant de prendre un trade, quel est ton plus gros blocage ?

  1. 😬 J’hésite trop avant d’entrer34%
  2. ⚡️ Je rentre trop vite sans vérifier28%
  3. 🤔 Je ne sais pas si mon setup est vraiment bon31%
  4. 🎯 Je gère mal mon SL / TP26%

The shares total 119%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

🔥2❤1

Signed Kylian Marlier

10 May 2026, 10:59 UTC≈1,670 views3 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

🚨 GOLD sous surveillance aujourd’hui Les 18 IA ont analysé un setup BUY sur l’or avec 78% de POUR : 📌 Entrée : 4723 🎯 Objectif : 4880 🔐 Sécurité : 4697 Le setup est agressif mais intéressant : ➡️ risque limité ➡️ objectif ambitieux ➡️ ratio très favorable ❗️Mais attention : sur l’or, un mouvement peut vite invalider une configuration si l’entrée est mal gérée. C’est exactement pour ça que l’outil est utile : ava…

❤1👍1👏1

Signed Kylian Marlier

7 May 2026, 08:43 UTC≈1,750 viewsread 8 August 2026

Voici un exemple concret d'une analyse Ichimoku passée au filtre des 18 IA ! Le résultat est très intéressant 👀 https://youtu.be/0mFgCjV_s2Q

Signed Kylian Marlier

Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @outil_ia. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

12 May 2026, 07:44 UTCAnonymous Poll87 voters

👀 Avant de prendre un trade, quel est ton plus gros blocage ?

  1. 😬 J’hésite trop avant d’entrer34%
  2. ⚡️ Je rentre trop vite sans vérifier28%
  3. 🤔 Je ne sais pas si mon setup est vraiment bon31%
  4. 🎯 Je gère mal mon SL / TP26%

The shares total 119%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

4 May 2026, 13:30 UTCAnonymous Poll145 voters

Comment s’est passée votre journée de trading ?

  1. Gagnante 🏆28%
  2. Perdante 📉15%
  3. Je n’ai pas tradé 😴57%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 2 May 2026 to 5 June 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 2 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Outil IA” (@outil_ia), 193 subscribers as measured 2 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/outil_ia.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.