Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 合理的信仰

Channel

合理的信仰

@ourreasonablefaith

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

679subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 28 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001437830071
TypeChannel
Username@ourreasonablefaith
CreatedBetween 1 April 2019 and 31 October 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded28 August 2026
Last confirmed live26 September 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 26 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/ourreasonablefaith

Topic

Religion — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 20 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

676679677.528 August 2026 — 679 subscribers28 August 2026 — 679 subscribers7 September 2026 — 677 subscribers14 September 2026 — 676 subscribers26 September 2026 — 679 subscribers28 August 202626 September 2026
5 measurements spanning 29 days. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 676–679 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
26 Sept 2026, 20:40679+3
14 Sept 2026, 18:56676-1
7 Sept 2026, 12:17677-2
28 Aug 2026, 19:45679no change
28 Aug 2026, 19:31679first reading

Engagement

13 posts held, back to 24 February 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 13 posts for this entry, the most recent from 17 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

17 reactions across 7 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 82.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤1482.4%
👍317.6%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 7 of the 13 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 17 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 13 most recent posts we hold, published 24 February 2026 to 17 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

17 Aug 2026, 16:00 UTC177 views2 reactionsread 28 August 2026

https://www.facebook.com/share/v/1C6QiZgiue/?mibextid=wwXIfr

❤2

17 Aug 2026, 08:33 UTC193 viewsread 28 August 2026

【林前12:26】若一个肢体受苦,所有的肢体就一同受苦 【希伯来书13:3 】你们要记念被捆绑的人, 好像与他们同受捆绑 ,也要记念遭苦害的人, 想到自己也在肉身之内。 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zogtOdR2fS0

11 Aug 2026, 11:20 UTC285 viewsread 28 August 2026

https://www.facebook.com/share/r/1DK6U4om2V/?mibextid=wwXIfr

3 Jul 2026, 08:14 UTC597 views5 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Forwarded from @CCEnCA

當教會變成一套系統──從教會論反思華里克《標竿》神學的偏差 過去二、三十年間,華里克(Rick Warren)的《標竿人生》(The Purpose Driven Life)、《標竿教會》(The Purpose Driven Church)及整套「標竿」(Purpose Driven)系統,幾乎影響了整個華人福音派教會。無數教會推行「四十天運動」、101、201、301、401課程,以及「五大目的」、「健康教會」、「核心同工」等制度,希望建立一間更成熟、更有使命、更有效率的教會。 然而,本文並非要指控《標竿》是異端。事實上,華里克並沒有否定三一神、基督的神人二性、十字架、復活或因信稱義等基督教核心信仰。他的問題,不在於基本教義,而在於整個神學的重心逐漸偏移:由福音轉向方法,由恩典轉向系統,由基督轉向目的,由教會作為基督的身體,轉向教會作為一套可以管理、複製和量度成果的組織。 一、教會論:最大的偏差──教會由身體變成系統 …

👍3❤2

14 Jun 2026, 01:33 UTC554 views5 reactionsread 28 August 2026

好文! GEMINI翻译成中文: 他们选择了犹大——基督徒应该不去观看《耶稣基督超级巨星》的4个理由 “多年来,我一直想写一些关于加略人犹大的东西,我认为他是一个非常有趣的人物。” —— 蒂姆·莱斯(Tim Rice),《耶稣基督超级巨星》联合创作者 《耶稣基督超级巨星》(*Jesus Christ Superstar*)的创作者安德鲁·劳埃德·韦伯(Andrew Lloyd Webber)和蒂姆·莱斯选择了加略人犹大作为他们构思这部音乐剧的视角。 这是一个极具启示性的选择,甚至可能比他们预期的更具揭示性。犹大并不是从远处背叛耶稣的,他是从门徒圈子的内部背叛了祂。他的接近权使得这场背叛成为可能。而《耶稣基督超级巨星》的运作方式如出一辙:它通过让人产生熟悉感来获取信任。它盗用了耶稣的名字、福音故事以及基督教的神圣符号。然后,它从内部对这些符号进行重新塑造,并最终对其进行了贬低。 这绝非艺术。这是披着艺术外衣的背叛。如…

❤5

26 May 2026, 11:19 UTC520 views1 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Photo

在经典的《最后的晚餐》画作中,那一幕定格了人性的惊惶、猜疑与背叛。然而在历史的帷幕之上,有一双眼睛早已洞悉了一切——从亘古到永远,没有什么能对祂隐瞒。 上帝的“全知”,不仅是一个神学命题,更是我们信仰中最坚实的锚。祂知道星宿的数目,知道麻雀的掉落,更知道你我心中每一个未曾言说的叹息与挣扎。当我们在未知的世界中感到迷茫时,唯有回到这位无所不知的上帝面前,才能找到真正的安息与引领。 本周六,诚邀您一同深入探讨神学中关于“上帝全知”的真理,在系统性的学习中,重新认识这位鉴察人心、却又以永恒之爱爱我们的神。 📌 系统神学神论讲座: 主题: 上帝的无所不知 日期: 2026年5月30日(星期六) 时间: 早上 10:00 AM 地点: GALILEE EDUCATION CENTRE 37, Jalan Cantik 3, Taman Pelangi Indah, 81800 Ulu Tiram, Johor Darul Ta…

❤1

11 May 2026, 08:39 UTC597 views2 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Photo

在这个充满动荡的时代,无论是周遭的境遇、还是我们内心的情绪,似乎一切都在经历着不断的改变。 然而,圣经却向我们启示了一位“永不改变”(Immutability)的上帝。祂的本体、智慧、权能和恩典,不受时间的侵蚀,永远不会缩水。 正如伦勃朗所画的《加利利海上的风暴》这幅画,画面的左半部分被巨浪和撕裂的帆占据,船只在风暴中剧烈倾斜,门徒们陷入极度的恐慌,有人在奋力挣扎,有人在呕吐。这代表了我们所处的这个动荡不安、充满未知变化的世界。 在画面右下角相对幽暗的地方,基督却安然醒来,神态异常平静。在这个充满剧烈波动的画面中,基督是唯一的“静止点”(Still point)。祂的存在提醒我们,纵然环境翻天覆地,上帝依然是那稳固的灵魂之锚。 我们信仰的根基,从来不是建立在自身信心的涨落或环境的好坏上,而是建立在这位“昨日、今日、一直到永远是一样”的基督磐石上。 今天,你的心是随着世事摇摆,还是安息在那道永不改变的真光中?让我们透过这…

❤2

14 Apr 2026, 07:50 UTC710 views1 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Photo

在《路加福音》中,那两个前往以马忤斯的门徒,带着满心的失望与破碎前行。直到那位“陌生人”走近,为他们解开经文,在那一刻,光刺破了黑暗,绝望变成了火热的盼望。 这个来临的星期六,邀请你来听一个关于“反转”的故事。 不管你正处于怎样的阴霾中,愿那道刺破黑暗的光,也照亮你的路。✨ 【耶稣复活的信息:刺破黑暗的复活】 📍 地点: INFINITY8 Mount Austin, JB ⏰ 时间: 2026年4月18日 早上10点 (星期六) 🎙 讲员: 卢祯宋传道(新加坡归正福音教会传道)

❤1

2 Apr 2026, 01:13 UTC607 viewsread 28 August 2026
Forwarded from @STEMI2022Photo

You are cordially invited 🙏🙏🙏 go.stemi.sg/directions

21 Mar 2026, 13:19 UTC691 viewsread 28 August 2026
Forwarded from @STEMI2022Photo

没有人是完美的,即使是我们最爱的人也不例外。然而,那份爱可以通过那位从罪中释放我们的祂之死的完善。只有这样,我们才能真正彼此相爱。 欢迎前来聆听更多关于祂 reconciles(和好)的死亡意义的分享,在**耶稣受难节布道会** 🗓️ 2026年4月3日(星期五) 📍 新加坡博览中心会议室(Garnet) 🕰️ 下午5点 ℹ️ 儿童可同时参加**儿童布道会** #耶稣受难日 #福音 #stemi

10 Mar 2026, 06:49 UTC652 viewsread 28 August 2026

https://www.instagram.com/p/DVsb8nIETs8/?igsh=MTlmZ25ncHhwMmozdQ==

6 Mar 2026, 01:16 UTC663 viewsread 28 August 2026
Forwarded from @STEMI2022Photo

破碎的关系或冲突是我们大多数人都曾经历过的😢。有时,来自至亲的伤害最令人痛彻心扉。我们该如何与痛苦和解?又该如何原谅他们?来了解一场化解人类罪孽的救赎之死。 🗓️ 2026年4月3日(周五) 📍 新加坡博览中心会议室 - Garnet 🕰️ 下午5点 ℹ️ 儿童布道会同步进行 #复活节 #福音 #stemi

Showing the 12 most recent of 13 posts we hold for @ourreasonablefaith. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 26 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“合理的信仰” (@ourreasonablefaith), 679 subscribers as measured 26 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ourreasonablefaith.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.