Channel
@ourcryptotalk_tg
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
698subscribers
+1 since we began measuring on 12 September 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002143643056 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @ourcryptotalk_tg |
| Created | Between 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 12 September 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 13 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/ourcryptotalk_tg |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 13 Sept 2026, 19:01 | 698 | +1 |
| 12 Sept 2026, 05:22 | 697 | no change |
| 12 Sept 2026, 04:47 | 697 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 17 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (17 August 2026 – 11 September 2026) |
| Views total | 2,726 |
| Reactions total | 75 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 12 Sept 2026, 05:22 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
81 reactions across 20 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 35.8% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 29 | 35.8% | |
| 👍 | 19 | 23.5% | |
| 💯 | 19 | 23.5% | |
| 🔥 | 9 | 11.1% | |
| 😁 | 1 | 1.23% | |
| 😈 | 1 | 1.23% | |
| 🤔 | 1 | 1.23% | |
| 🥱 | 1 | 1.23% | |
| 🫡 | 1 | 1.23% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 81 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 17 August 2026 to 11 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Sub $100M Alts headed for 5X > $GEOD > $NOCK > $AIOZ > $XPR > $IO > $ACU Most of the sector spent this year bleeding on nothing but hopium and node counts. These six held relative strength because they had something rarer: real revenue burns or a monetary design that didn't lean on emissions to survive. That combination is exactly what gets repriced hardest once liquidity rotates back into infrastructure. → @GEO…
❤4
$VVV | @AskVenice VS $TAO | @opentensor Venice has generated all the hype this week after hitting a new all-time high and crossing a $1.2B+ market cap. But that has also brought attention back to TAO, the leader of decentralized AI for years. Market cap: $TAO: ~$2.66B $VVV: ~$1.13B We ran the numbers to see which one actually holds up 👇 1️⃣ WHAT YOU'RE ACTUALLY BUYING Venice is a consumer-facing private AI app…
❤3💯2
Why $ANYONE | @anyonefdn could be back from the dead and moving towards a 10x? 👀 The setup in one line: ➠ In late 2024, the market valued Anyone, then fresh off its ATOR rebrand, north of $210M. It was one of the loudest privacy + DePIN plays of the 2024-25 cycle. ➠ Today it sits around $20M, has already run roughly 4x off its August lows, and is still shipping product every week. The chart woke up before most pe…
❤3💯2🔥2
We plotted every major Layer 1 by fully diluted valuation against real usage (30-day active daily addresses). They sort into four clean types: 1️⃣ The Blue Chips (ETH, BNB, Solana, Tron) Big valuations backed by millions of daily users. Earned it. 2️⃣ The Ghost Chains (Cardano, Stellar, Sui): Valued in the billions, used by a relative handful. The gap is the whole story. 3️⃣ The Grinders (NEAR, Aptos, Injective):…
👍3💯3😈1
VOLATILITY IS ON FOR CRYPTO 🔥 Fed is likely to increase rates Markets could see some sell pressure Alts with bearish catalysts 🔴 $RAIN $ONDO $PEAQ $SEI Alts with bullish catalysts 🟢 $PONS | @ponsdotfamily $EGLD | @MultiversX $CNPY | @CNPYNetwork $INK | @inkonchain Which projects did we miss? > Bitcoin is holding $78k which is much needed but $83k needs to break > Solana reclaiming $100 was important but its …
👍3
FOMO WILL KICK AGAIN 🔥 These Alts are moving again after cool-off > $PONS > $SYRUP > $KAS > $QNT > $VSN > $PENDLE Timing is key when we are talking short term timeframes. And a breakout after a cool-off is a strong evidence of long term buy pressure whenever price drops. Which ones are you adding here?
🔥2👍1
Robinhood>Ethereum? Yes Robinhood doubled its TVL but ETH still beats it in the combined score Best TVL Performers in August : >$ETH : 100 > Robinhood : 90 >$SOL: 24 > Base : 24 > $MON: 22 > $HYPE: 19 > $BTC: 17 > $BNB: 10 > $ARB : 6 >$TRX: 2 → Ethereum still tops the OCT TVL Score, but only because of pure size. It added $7.72B in August, more than every other chain on this list combined, and that alone is enough…
💯3👍1
AI tokens have not done very well in 2026 so far but we are still super bullish on the narrative Why stay bullish on AI Projects? > Bittensor ($TAO): Subnet demand drives real token sinks. Top class ecosystem. > NEAR Protocol ($NEAR): Chain abstraction plus genuine user retention. Huge user base for AI > Internet Computer ($ICP): AI app-builder reviving developer activity. Very far from ATH, massive upside > Rend…
💯2👍1
Photo, posted without a caption
❤2🥱1
Altcoins won't die because the recent pump did not break a trendline. We are talking about Alts outside top 10 : >$ZEC >$LINK >$XLM >$SUI >$ONDO >$TAO >$ICP Why are we ignoring the momentum and wicks here? Here's what the wicks show us : Same chart but zoomed out and there's a support zone at $150B that's been tested through every major flush since 2020 and never actually broken. The post Covid rally correction ta…
❤2💯1
Token unlocks you should be aware of before the bull market Huge unlocks left (low float, heavy overhang): $SUI : ~40% released, rest vesting to 2030 $STRK : ~34% released $PI : ~1.21B unlocking across 2026 alone $W : low float, multi-year investor vesting live $TIA : large investor and team cliffs still ongoing $KAITO : ~30% released $EIGEN : ~36% released $PUMP : ~43% released, ~247B still locked $ENA : ~60% relea…
❤4👍2
Sorry but if you missed the bottom, you are behind. These 3 big indicators do not lie. → $USDT dominance rejected again → $ETH/ $BTC broke its downtrend → Altcoins bounced off key support We will go by some facts and everyone with 2 eyes can see them. 👉 USDT Dominance Currently sitting near 6.944%, and that number matters more than it looks. Both prior bear market bottoms formed in this exact zone, right after …
🔥4
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @ourcryptotalk_tg. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Our Crypto Talk - News, Updates & Gems” (@ourcryptotalk_tg), 698 subscribers as measured 13 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ourcryptotalk_tg.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.