Channel
@ouat_live
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
46subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 11 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002448174899 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @ouat_live |
| Created | Between 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 11 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 11 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 11 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/ouat_live |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 11 Aug 2026, 06:26 | 46 | no change |
| 11 Aug 2026, 06:01 | 46 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 26 February 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 20 June 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
23 reactions across 7 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 34.8% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5226844443247674493 | 8 | 34.8% | |
| custom 5226874155831433742 | 7 | 30.4% | |
| custom 5228781512152878214 | 6 | 26.1% | |
| custom 5228920892431568477 | 2 | 8.70% |
Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 7 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 23reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 26 February 2026 to 20 June 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
𝙻𝙸𝚅𝙴||𝚘𝚗𝚌𝚎 𝚞𝚙𝚘𝚗 𝚊 𝚝𝚒𝚖𝚎✧˚ · . pinned «🤩🤩— к большому сожалению, мы вынуждены закрыть лайф канал в связи с блокировкой телеграма и нехваткой времени. очень надеемся, что в будущем мы снова сможем вести лайф, но пока что вот так. флуд продолжит работу, но без данного канала. разрыв со всеми проектами.…»
🤩🤩— к большому сожалению, мы вынуждены закрыть лайф канал в связи с блокировкой телеграма и нехваткой времени. очень надеемся, что в будущем мы снова сможем вести лайф, но пока что вот так. флуд продолжит работу, но без данного канала. разрыв со всеми проектами. #𝚒𝚖𝚙𝚘𝚛𝚝𝚊𝚗𝚝_𝙾𝚄𝙰𝚃
🤩- здравствуйте, подписчики, участники, и наши уважаемые союзники. хочу сообщить, что по всей видимости, у Ибуки перестал работать телеграм, так как она давно не появляется в сети. приносим извинения за долгое молчание и неактив. ноо, вышло как есть. надеюсь, что это закончится как можно быстрее, а пока мы, к сожалению, продлеваем рест до неопределённого времени. ещё раз приносим извинения. #𝚜𝚑𝚙_𝙾𝚄𝙰𝚃
ребята, я прошу прощение и хочу взять рест на недельку-две т.к. телега ели грузит 😔 буду очень благодарна если кто то посоветует хороший впн #𝚜𝚑𝚙_𝙾𝚄𝙰𝚃 #𝚒𝚖𝚙𝚘𝚛𝚝𝚊𝚗𝚝_𝙾𝚄𝙰𝚃
🤩-справляемся с блокировками как можем #𝚜𝚑𝚙_𝙾𝚄𝙰𝚃
🤩- это последнее, честно #𝚜𝚑𝚙_𝙾𝚄𝙰𝚃
🤩 - смотрите, семейное фото нашего флуда #𝚜𝚑𝚙_𝙾𝚄𝙰𝚃
໒꒰ྀིっ˕ -｡꒱ྀི১🟣 𓂃 🟣茶鷦 ₊🟣 « !? » 03:03 ||ɴᴇᴡ ᴜɴɪᴏɴ✧˚ · . ≻───⊹───⊱ ★ ⊰───⊹───≺ у κᥲжд᧐ᥔ ᥙᥴᴛ᧐ρᥙᥙ ᥱᥴᴛь ᥴʙ᧐ᥱ нᥲчᥲ᧘᧐ ᥙ κ᧐нᥱц, н᧐ нᥲдᥱюᥴь чᴛ᧐ у ϶ᴛ᧐ᥔ κ᧐нцᥲ нᥱ δудᥱᴛ! ᥴ ϶ᴛ᧐ᴦ᧐ дня нᥲɯ ᥰρ᧐ᥱκᴛ ᥙ 学花 |`𝑿𝑼𝑬𝑯𝑼𝑨_ ᥴ᧐юɜнᥙκᥙ! ᥙнɸ᧐ ᧘ᥲᥔɸ #𝚗𝚎𝚠𝚞𝚗𝚒𝚘𝚗_𝙾𝚄𝙰𝚃
໒꒰ྀིっ˕ -｡꒱ྀི১🟣 𓂃 🟣茶鷦 ₊🟣 « !? » 03:03 ||ɴᴇᴡ ᴜɴɪᴏɴ✧˚ · . ≻───⊹───⊱ ★ ⊰───⊹───≺ у κᥲжд᧐ᥔ ᥙᥴᴛ᧐ρᥙᥙ ᥱᥴᴛь ᥴʙ᧐ᥱ нᥲчᥲ᧘᧐ ᥙ κ᧐нᥱц, н᧐ нᥲдᥱюᥴь чᴛ᧐ у ϶ᴛ᧐ᥔ κ᧐нцᥲ нᥱ δудᥱᴛ! ᥴ ϶ᴛ᧐ᴦ᧐ дня нᥲɯ ᥰρ᧐ᥱκᴛ ᥙ 𝑩𝒖𝒕𝒕𝒆𝒓𝒃𝒆𝒆𝒓 ᥴ᧐юɜнᥙκᥙ! ᥙнɸ᧐ ᧘ᥲᥔɸ #𝚗𝚎𝚠𝚞𝚗𝚒𝚘𝚗_𝙾𝚄𝙰𝚃
как то маловат сегодня репостов, надеюсь я ничего не проглядела #𝚜𝚑𝚙_𝙾𝚄𝙰𝚃
໒꒰ྀིっ˕ -｡꒱ྀི১🟣 𓂃 🟣茶鷦 ₊🟣 « !? » 03:03 ||ɴᴇᴡ ᴜɴɪᴏɴ✧˚ · . ≻───⊹───⊱ ★ ⊰───⊹───≺ у κᥲжд᧐ᥔ ᥙᥴᴛ᧐ρᥙᥙ ᥱᥴᴛь ᥴʙ᧐ᥱ нᥲчᥲ᧘᧐ ᥙ κ᧐нᥱц, н᧐ нᥲдᥱюᥴь чᴛ᧐ у ϶ᴛ᧐ᥔ κ᧐нцᥲ нᥱ δудᥱᴛ! ᥴ ϶ᴛ᧐ᴦ᧐ дня нᥲɯ ᥰρ᧐ᥱκᴛ ᥙ 𝗡𝗜𝗚𝗛𝗧 𝗦𝗧𝗔𝗥 ᥴ᧐юɜнᥙκᥙ! ᥙнɸ᧐ ᧘ᥲᥔɸ #𝚗𝚎𝚠𝚞𝚗𝚒𝚘𝚗_𝙾𝚄𝙰𝚃
custom 52268444432476744931custom 52268741558314337421custom 52287815121528782141
с каждым разом тг работает все хуже и хуже..🤩 #𝚜𝚑𝚙_𝙾𝚄𝙰𝚃
custom 52268444432476744932custom 52287815121528782141custom 52289208924315684771
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @ouat_live. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
нᥲ удᥲчу
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 26 February 2026 to 20 June 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank — 937,404 of 1,189,255entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@ouat_live named 3 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“𝙻𝙸𝚅𝙴||𝚘𝚗𝚌𝚎 𝚞𝚙𝚘𝚗 𝚊 𝚝𝚒𝚖𝚎✧˚ · .” (@ouat_live), 46 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ouat_live.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.