Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Отзывы о БФМ от братьев

Channel

Отзывы о БФМ от братьев

@otzyvy_bfm

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

76subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001409945022
TypeChannel
Username@otzyvy_bfm
DescriptionПрисылайте свои отзывы о проекте и об участниках Б.Ф.М с кем вы вели дела. Отправить отзыв можно: @bfm_admin @Biznes_forum_musulman
Created31 March 2020measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded9 August 2026
Last confirmed live17 September 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/otzyvy_bfm

Growth

766 August 2026 — 76 subscribers9 August 2026 — 76 subscribers6 August 20269 August 2026
2 measurements spanning 3 days. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 75–77 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
9 Aug 2026, 20:4576no change
6 Aug 2026, 23:0276first reading

Engagement

14 posts held, back to 28 November 2022the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 14 posts for this entry, the most recent from 15 September 2023. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Photos
122
Videos
64
Links
39

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 9 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
1m 23s
Average length
42s

Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

4 reactions across 4 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 75.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥375.0%
125.0%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 5 of the 14 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 4 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 14 most recent posts we hold, published 28 November 2022 to 15 September 2023, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

19 May 2023, 05:40 UTC141 viewsread 9 August 2026

https://chat.whatsapp.com/HjuVzgkGd66JSEaPKaYzrN Ас салам алейкум Уважаемый друг. Это группа поддержки деятельности Фахруддина Мирзоева в соцсетях. Думаю что многие из вас недостаточно знакомы с моими проектами которые я веду помимо БФМ.Просьба максимально быть активным в комментариях и делиться моими видеороликами . Группа закрытая для удобства всех нас. https://chat.whatsapp.com/HjuVzgkGd66JSEaPKaYzrN

28 Apr 2023, 05:53 UTC219 views1 reactionsread 9 August 2026

Ас салам алейкум уважаемые братья. Пусть Аллах даст барака в наших делах в этот Благословенный День Джума. Братья отправляют очень много отзывов и не могу все их выкладывать здесь поэтому вы можете посмотреть их на телеграмм канале https://t.me/otzyvy_bfm Также вы можете увидеть отзывы у меня на статусе ватсап wa.me/79867372095 отправьте сообщение хочу увидеть статус чтобы я записал ваш номер тоже .

🔥1

28 Apr 2023, 05:01 UTC≈1,300 views1 reactionsread 9 August 2026

Ассаламу алейкум. Я работал с братом Альбертом, познакомились на БФМ кажется из Башкирии, заказывали у него 2 сайта, приобрёл лицензию на Битрикс24. Очень доволен сотрудничеством с ним по всем параметрам - приятный на общение, хороший нрав, грамотная речь, отлично разбирается в своём деле, очень оперативно в любое время дня и ночи даёт ответы на возникающие вопросы, никогда не показывал недовольства, даже когда ночью

🔥1

28 Apr 2023, 05:00 UTC≈1,580 views1 reactionsread 9 August 2026

Ассаляму аллейкум,братья. Хочу написать отзыв. Наш брат,Адель,с Казани,устанавливает видеонаблюдение. Очень качественно и за приемлемые деньги. Мне нужно было установить систему видеонаблюдения на производстве поддонов, в Респ.Марий Эл. Сперва он отказался,из за дальности расстояния,но когда узнал что я состою в БФМ,согласился. Сам приехал,рассчитал сколько камер видеонаблюдений нужно, сам купил необходимое количест

🔥1

7 Jan 2023, 07:01 UTC≈1,670 views1 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

И всё таки встретились! БФМ объединяет! БФМ сплачивает! БФМ сближает! БФМ соединяет! БФМ связывает! БФМ братает! БФМ скрепляет! БФМ консолидирует! БФМ сводит! Короче, БФМ - рулит! #отзывы https://t.me/otzyvy_bfm

1

2 Dec 2022, 17:24 UTC192 viewsread 9 August 2026

https://chat.whatsapp.com/GkMQIv8vxMQKDFFasoK37p 📣Уважаемые братья! Мы открыли Единую Группу МБФМ в котором мы соберём ин ша Аллах больше 1000 подписчиков и это будет основная группа в котором будут важные сообщения чтобы вы не пропустили. 🚨Она закрытая максимум несколько сообщений в день 🤗

28 Nov 2022, 19:37 UTC158 views0 reactionsread 9 August 2026

https://chat.whatsapp.com/GkMQIv8vxMQKDFFasoK37p 📣Уважаемые братья! Мы открыли Единую Группу МБФМ в котором мы соберём ин ша Аллах больше 1000 подписчиков и это будет основная группа в котором будут важные сообщения чтобы вы не пропустили. 🚨Она закрытая максимум несколько сообщений в день 🤗

Showing the 12 most recent of 14 posts we hold for @otzyvy_bfm. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Отзывы о БФМ от братьев” (@otzyvy_bfm), 76 subscribers as measured 9 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/otzyvy_bfm.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.