Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

ОТЗЫВЫ

@otzyvkup

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

79subscribers

+1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003237757257
TypeChannel
Username@otzyvkup
CreatedBetween 1 October 2025 and 26 January 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded9 August 2026
Last confirmed live14 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 14 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/otzyvkup

Growth

787978.57 August 2026 — 78 subscribers9 August 2026 — 78 subscribers14 August 2026 — 79 subscribers7 August 202614 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 7 days, net +1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 78–79 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
14 Aug 2026, 07:4579+1
9 Aug 2026, 20:0278no change
7 Aug 2026, 19:1378first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 26 January 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 30 June 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Recent posts

28 May 2026, 16:55 UTC≈2,280 viewsread 9 August 2026

Дмитрий все оперативно сделал, подписчики увеличились ( нужны были в Max). Был на связи постоянно! Советую!

24 May 2026, 07:30 UTC≈2,700 viewsread 9 August 2026

Огромная благодарность за подписчиков, раньше не встречал такое ответственное отношение, многие закидывают в канал кого попало

12 May 2026, 15:21 UTC≈3,810 viewsread 9 August 2026

Благодарю Вас за отличный сервис! Оплатила и в течении суток открылись сторис в телеграм . Спасибо ! Буду пользоваться и Вас рекомендовать 👌

19 Apr 2026, 10:19 UTC≈7,660 viewsread 9 August 2026

Дима, спасибо тебе огромное за этот результат! Я сейчас в приятном шоке. До этого я несколько лет работала с другими людьми, вкладывала огромные суммы, а получала какой-то минимум... было очень обидно за слитые бюджеты. А тут мы только начали, я потратила совсем небольшие деньги, а результат уже в 10 раз круче, чем всё, что было до этого годами! Жалею только об одном — что не встретила тебя раньше. Дима, ты настоящий

11 Apr 2026, 11:59 UTC≈8,260 viewsread 9 August 2026

взял 50 бустов сроком на неделю, пришли за полчаса🫢 очень удивлен, что так быстро, спасибо, еще буду обращаться 😉

24 Mar 2026, 09:24 UTC≈10,600 viewsread 9 August 2026

🏆Большая благодарность Дмитрию за сотрудничество и полноценный трафик целевой аудитории для развития бизнеса! Благодарю за чёткую рациональную работу ,честность и ваш профессионализм! Готова к сотрудничеству на постоянной основе! С уважением Анна. 😀😀😀😀😀

6 Mar 2026, 12:44 UTC≈11,600 viewsread 9 August 2026

Спасибо большое за быстрое решение вопроса! Наконец могу пользоваться сторис каждый день!

27 Feb 2026, 15:10 UTC≈11,400 viewsread 9 August 2026

Положительный отзыв. Купил 100 бустов для чата – за пару часов все пришло, четко, быстро, без проблем.

20 Feb 2026, 07:56 UTC≈11,400 viewsread 9 August 2026

Спасибо большое за отличную работу! Покупали Бусты. Всё чётко, быстро, без обмана. Обязательно обратимся ещё.

19 Feb 2026, 15:06 UTC≈10,500 viewsread 9 August 2026

Заказывала Бусты Все пришло оперативно Спасибо 🙏

13 Feb 2026, 13:25 UTC≈10,500 viewsread 9 August 2026

Быстро, качественно, без лишних вопросов.

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @otzyvkup. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 273,934 of 1,478,351entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“ОТЗЫВЫ” (@otzyvkup), 79 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/otzyvkup.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.