Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Отзывы

Channel

Отзывы

@otzivklyev

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

10subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 9 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002203308945
TypeChannel
Username@otzivklyev
DescriptionТолько отзывы о - https://t.me/zelyarekl Чат по рекламе - https://t.me/+K6YrCOV6feM4ZmMy По заказу только сюда - @zelyaboy
CreatedBetween 1 June 2024 and 28 June 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded12 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/otzivklyev

Growth

109 August 2026 — 10 subscribers12 August 2026 — 10 subscribers9 August 202612 August 2026
2 measurements spanning 3 days. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 9–11 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 10:3310no change
9 Aug 2026, 14:4910first reading

Engagement

18 posts held, back to 28 June 2024the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 18 posts for this entry, the most recent from 2 September 2024. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Photos
7
Links
2

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

10 reactions across 5 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 40.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
440.0%
👍440.0%
😱220.0%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 5 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 10reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 28 June 2024 to 2 September 2024, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

19 Aug 2024, 06:56 UTC444 views1 reactionsread 12 August 2026

@zelyaboy огромное спасибо! Быстро, качественно и работает! Подписывается реально живая аудитория, все как надо!

1

4 Aug 2024, 16:00 UTC468 views1 reactionsread 12 August 2026

@zelyaboy спасибо за работу, гарант выполнен, все честно👍

👍1

3 Aug 2024, 06:07 UTC469 viewsread 12 August 2026

Провели сделку на 100к без гаранта Все четко @zelyaboy

2 Aug 2024, 08:38 UTC450 viewsread 12 August 2026

Обратная связь: Получилась хорошая отдача , думаю было бы у меня больше подписчиков было бы еще интереснее)

30 Jul 2024, 07:33 UTC423 viewsread 12 August 2026

Всё огонь! купил у @zelyaboy 2000пдп. Зашли за 8 дней примерно.Живые! ЕR норм 16-20%.С зп еще возьму

24 Jul 2024, 18:03 UTC325 viewsread 12 August 2026

Брала привод у самого лучшего менеджера @zelyaboy, завели 1к пдп как договаривались 🥹🥹🥹 и ещё бонусом 150+ человек😱 Просмотры и актив поднялся, так что рекомендую всем, сама буду брать ещё 🔥🔥🔥 Серёжа как всегда топ 🌾

24 Jul 2024, 00:08 UTC299 viewsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Отзывы обо мне с телега ин... По прежнему ни одного плохого!

12 Jul 2024, 18:37 UTC298 views3 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Чатик рекламы - https://t.me/+K6YrCOV6feM4ZmMy Скоро запуск. Уже более 200 заявок. Бесплатно!

😱2👍1

Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @otzivklyev. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Отзывы” (@otzivklyev), 10 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/otzivklyev.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.