Channel
@otzivicleanch
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
17subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001804965872 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @otzivicleanch |
| Description | Улучшаем рынок, помогаем людям 🤝 Проводим честный анализ каналов @cleanchannels 👨💻 Поддержка сервиса @Cleanch_Support 🤖 Весь функционал - @cleanchan_bot |
| Created | Between 1 October 2022 and 22 February 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 11 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/otzivicleanch |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 11 Aug 2026, 19:46 | 17 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 08:31 | 17 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 22 February 2023 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 23 March 2024. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 11 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
151 reactions across 20 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 51.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 77 | 51.0% | |
| ❤ | 42 | 27.8% | |
| 🔥 | 24 | 15.9% | |
| 👏 | 4 | 2.65% | |
| 🌚 | 3 | 1.99% | |
| ☃ | 1 | 0.662% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 151reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 22 February 2023 to 23 March 2024, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Честный отзыв о @cleanchannels от @yeezyzakup Без лишних слов хочу сказать, что этот проект однажды мне очень помог в работе с куплей/продажей каналов. Очень крутой и, главное, полезный сервис на рынке. Сохраняйте его себе, не теряйте. Однажды может пригодиться
❤5👏1🔥1
Все чётко проверяли канал на накрут. Это лучшее что можно было сделать в телеграмм Рекомендую 👍
🔥6
ЧК - это клад который имеет огромный потенциал, место которое рождает рекламодателей в том числе и внешних. Окуп буквально в течении часа , если у вас чистый канал, газуйте
❤4🔥2
Все честно, аккуратно, грамотно. Грамотная поддержка. Все во время. Выполнили задание. Давно искал таких дизайнеров, и судя по работе. Видимо нашел и буду сотрудничать в дальнейшем. Спасибо. Ставлю 5 звезд.
❤3👏3👍1
Спасибо за профессиональный подход в аналитике каналов. @cleanchannels Даже выявили мою группу ВК откуда тоже немного трафика идёт) На все вопросы отвечают быстро и понятно. Также появились и дополнительные рекламодатели. Ребята знают свое дело и делают качественно!
👍5❤1🔥1
Заказывал «анализ канала» в @cleanchan_bot, ребята выполнили свою задачу быстро и качественно Буду еще обращаться, советую)
👍9❤4🔥4
Рассматривал несколько каналов к покупке, но не умел правильно их проверять на накрутку, поэтому решил обратиться к @cleanchan_bot Парни проверили все достаточно быстро и не дали купить мне неэффективные каналы, очень доволен их работой ☺️🤝
👍7
Купить канал или заливать с нуля? Когда решено было создавать канал, была мысль купить готовый канал. Искал канал на покупку где то 3 дня, все биржи пересмотрел, большинство каналов либо слишком дорого, либо накрут. Был один канал, который в принципе мне подходил. Закинул его в @cleanchan_bot , ребята посмотрели и выдали ответ - канал не рекомендован к покупке. В это же время общался с несколькими закупщиками. Обсу…
❤10
Заказывал подбор канала у "Чистые каналы" все сделали четко и профессионально. Проконсультировали по всем интересующим меня вопросам. Спасибо за подсказки и помощь! Буду обращаться в дальнейшем, советую всем 👍
👍7🔥1
Хочу оставить отзыв о @cleanchannels, ребята сделали все быстро, все проверили. Проверял каналы для их покупки, нашел отличный чистый канал и в итоге взял его🔥 Остерегают от покупки плохих каналов, спасибо Вам👌
❤6
Ребята делают все качественно и максимально понятно расписывают информацию по каналам😌 Спасибо, за отличный сервис @cleanchannels @cleanchan_bot
🔥7☃1❤1
отличный сервис, очень помогли разобраться.Я в сфере тг ещё новичок, особо ничего незнаю ещё, хотел купить тг канал, сделали полный анализ канала, очень качественно👍
👍7
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @otzivicleanch. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 943,923 of 1,480,975entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@otzivicleanch named 2 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Отзывы «Чистые каналы»” (@otzivicleanch), 17 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/otzivicleanch.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.