Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for отзывы nap1k

Channel

отзывы nap1k

@otzivi_nap1ka

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

9subscribers

-1 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002360790833
TypeChannel
Username@otzivi_nap1ka
CreatedBetween 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded12 August 2026
Last confirmed live16 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 16 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/otzivi_nap1ka

Growth

9109.58 August 2026 — 10 subscribers12 August 2026 — 10 subscribers16 August 2026 — 9 subscribers8 August 202616 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 9 days, net -1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 9–10 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
16 Aug 2026, 21:489-1
12 Aug 2026, 09:3110no change
8 Aug 2026, 02:4510first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 1 June 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 16 February 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
10s
Average length
3s

Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

1 reaction across 1 post, in 1 kind.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
1100.0%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 1 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 1 June 2025 to 16 February 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

16 Feb 2026, 17:25 UTC761 viewsread 12 August 2026

ахуеть впн этот самый лучший из которых я брал все пули попадают я меня кент сказал *ты заебал почему у тебя так регает а у меня нет*

10 Feb 2026, 19:58 UTC190 viewsread 12 August 2026

спасибо большое @nap1k_manager впн очень крутой регает

10 Feb 2026, 17:46 UTC191 viewsread 12 August 2026
Video

первый раз в жизни пробую что то подобное,впн прокси и т.д всегда относился скептически,но седня на эфире увидел что вроде у напика регает,решил попробовать первый раз,прошу заметить до этого регало почти всегда только тело,как только накатил впн,в первой же катке ощущаются ебанутые сбривы просто паранормальные,я очень рад,спасибо большое напик💕💕💕,следующим делом думаю купить оптимизацию,так как вроде только у него в

10 Feb 2026, 17:22 UTC148 viewsread 12 August 2026

Ебать впн реально имба,я в ахуе просто так стало круто регать спасибо большое напику за такой впн!

10 Feb 2026, 17:05 UTC138 viewsread 12 August 2026

впн самый крутой самый лучший реально класс не наебали регает +200% выиграл чебу

6 Feb 2026, 13:59 UTC151 viewsread 12 August 2026
Video

ебать за 400 рублей купил впн у @nap1k_manager регает все в ебало я в ахуе советую

5 Feb 2026, 14:20 UTC501 viewsread 12 August 2026

Отзыв: 2-3 бошки даю + если еще новидтся на лицо будет стабильно 2-3 , покупайте впн у напика @nap1k_manager

13 Dec 2025, 09:30 UTC951 viewsread 12 August 2026

Купил сенсу у напика ваще бомба аимить легче всем советую

1 Sept 2025, 21:42 UTC214 viewsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @nap1k404

+1 отзыв аренда 6 часов

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @otzivi_nap1ka. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“отзывы nap1k” (@otzivi_nap1ka), 9 subscribers as measured 16 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/otzivi_nap1ka.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.