Channel
@otziviLazareva
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
445subscribers
+12 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001696601429 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @otziviLazareva |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 16 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 6 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 16 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/otziviLazareva |
Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 21 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 51% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 16 Sept 2026, 22:20 | 445 | +8 |
| 9 Sept 2026, 09:55 | 437 | +1 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 07:28 | 436 | +2 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 19:54 | 434 | +1 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 05:17 | 433 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 12:46 | 433 | first reading |
19 posts held, back to 1 November 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 30 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
316 reactions across 17 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 33.2% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 105 | 33.2% | |
| 🔥 | 86 | 27.2% | |
| 👍 | 45 | 14.2% | |
| 🏆 | 30 | 9.49% | |
| 👏 | 13 | 4.11% | |
| ❤🔥 | 12 | 3.80% | |
| 🎉 | 7 | 2.22% | |
| ⚡ | 6 | 1.90% | |
| 🙏 | 6 | 1.90% | |
| 🥰 | 5 | 1.58% | |
| 😁 | 1 | 0.316% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 316 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 1 November 2025 to 30 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Добрый день, проходила я 10 дневный курс Людмилы, интересные практики, понравилось особенно с колючими мячиками работать, ещё что удивило каждый день были разные упражнения для глазок. Много полезной информации то что надо работать над мозгом и мне это тоже помогло. Если я раньше занималась упражнениями, даже порой бросала и результата было не видно, теперь я очень рада что наткнулась на Людмилу, она помогла мне разл…
❤8👍8🏆4
Доброе утро, я по поводу отзывов о курсах. Я Рысжан, из Казахстана, приобрела курсы по катаракте и глаукоме 15го июня этого года и вот мои результаты: я с огромной радостью сообщаю ,что в первую очеркдь я победила свою тревогу и страх, я стала более спокойней и уверенней в себе, на левом глазу делали операцию, на правом сказали начинающии глаукома и катаракта, правый глаз быстро уставал, долго телик не сиогла смотре…
❤8👏7❤🔥3
Добрый вечер! Хочу поделиться своими впечатлениями о курсах Людмилы. Моим первым приобретённым курсом стал «Восстановление зрения за 44 дня» (сейчас программа видоизменена и рассчитана на 60 дней). Результаты не заставили себя долго ждать! 🔥 У меня было –4 и –4,25, которые стремительно начали уходить после начала занятий. Медленно, но верно я практически полностью исправил своё зрение. Во время занятий складывает…
👍8🙏6🥰4❤1
Здравствуйте! Приобретал курс Восстановления зрения 60 занятий и консультации Людмилы Лазаревой, чуть больше чем за год вернул себе 100% зрение с -6 диоптрий и избавился от астигматизма! Очень рад что не стал делать коррекцию зрения, а доверился методике Людмилы!🙏🏻 Огромное спасибо Людмиле и всей команде!
👍9❤4👏4
Здравствуйте, хотели бы написать отзыв, мы находимся в группе включи свое зрение 2.0 сразу как начали делать зрение улучшилось!, прекрасное ощущение когда начинаешь видеть четко, конечно еще надо работать чтоб полностью восстановить, а так мы результат видим🥳❤️ дочка сразу почувствовала результат, мы вместе занимаемся улучшения зрения! Спасибо огромное!!!!❤️❤️ Главное желание восстановить свое зрение❤️
❤5❤🔥4🔥3
Женщина начала работать с катарактой и убирать диоптрии с 23-го июня
❤5🔥4
Людмила, огромная Вам благодарность, сегодня была у офтальмолога, у меня улучшения на каждом глазу❤️❤️❤️ Вы служите благому делу, удачи и успеха Вам🥰💕😇
❤9👍4🏆3🥰1
Замечательные результаты у Валентины! 🏆 Она начала заниматься с 6 июня - совсем недавно. Диагнозы: катаракта и начальная глаукома. Глаукомы уже нет - врач подтвердил и удивился поставленным диагнозам. Катаракта тоже постепенно уходит. Оба диагноза считаются в мире неизлечимыми! Записаться на консультацию: @Tatyanaadmin Отзывы о работе с Людмилой Лазаревой: https://t.me/otziviLazareva Мы в 😁: https://vk.ru/ja_wizu
❤10🏆4👏2
Прекрасный результат у Ларисы после занятий в Группе поддержки на курсе "Восстановление зрения 60 занятий"! 👍 Успейте приобрести курс со скидкой: https://t.me/ja_wizu/3317
🏆8🎉7⚡6🔥5❤1
Вот такой замечательный результат после 3 месяцев работы по курсу Глаукома!
🔥9❤4
Video, posted without a caption
🔥12❤8
Еще один отзыв от участника группы поддержки! ⬇️⬇️⬇️
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @otziviLazareva. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 5 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“ОТЗЫВЫ о работе с Людмилой Лазаревой” (@otziviLazareva), 445 subscribers as measured 16 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/otziviLazareva.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.