Channel
@ottozs1
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
1,990subscribers
-10 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001644786871 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @ottozs1 |
| Created | 2 July 2023 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 13 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/ottozs1 |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 13 Aug 2026, 05:33 | 1,990 | -6 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 12:02 | 1,996 | -3 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 05:27 | 1,999 | -1 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 19:46 | 2,000 | first reading |
11 posts held, back to 6 September 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 11 posts for this entry, the most recent from 24 January 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
2,482 reactions across 11 posts, in 14 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 40.1% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 996 | 40.1% | |
| ❤🔥 | 504 | 20.3% | |
| 🥰 | 393 | 15.8% | |
| 💋 | 312 | 12.6% | |
| 🔥 | 105 | 4.23% | |
| 💘 | 77 | 3.10% | |
| 🎉 | 36 | 1.45% | |
| 🍓 | 31 | 1.25% | |
| 🕊 | 10 | 0.403% | |
| 💔 | 9 | 0.363% | |
| 😍 | 3 | 0.121% | |
| 🙏 | 3 | 0.121% | |
| 💅 | 2 | 0.081% | |
| 🐳 | 1 | 0.04% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 11 of the 11 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2,482reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 11 most recent posts we hold, published 6 September 2025 to 24 January 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @ottozs1. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 11 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 6 September 2025 to 24 January 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
ну короче че сиську мять я подсознательно уже решилась на новый тгк да и ваши комменты с поддержкой оч подтолкнули спасибо вам!! ценю чмокаю новая кринжевальня https://t.me/ottozs я ещё хз ниче там не настроила потом будем разбираться надо делать пока чакра прикола еще активна ещё потом мб неск раз репостну чето оттудаьсюда ремайнд кинуть тем кто не увидит эти два поста 🤓
❤90❤🔥17💋10💘6😍1
чот меня уже давно угнетают цифры на этом тгк я как-то перестала ощущать что это мое место, как видите и обновы давно не пощу а тем временем у меня жёсткий гиперфикс по наруте с октября цветёт и пахнет вонючими учихами и обикаками, но знаете. СТРЕМНО стало сюда чето писать тем более щитпостить и япить о рандомной ерунде. лайк, когда тут выросло кол-во людей, я начала ощущать как будта стою голая в одном клоунском пар…
🥰109❤50🔥16💘8❤🔥2🐳1😍1
✨Первый арт в этом году это коллаба в магме с госпожой оттозс 🕺
❤🔥147🔥43🥰25❤16🍓5💘2😍1
ну что надеюсь все уже в курсе ситуации ксд зина, теперь можно и свою работу показать без ебучего цветокора и обрезов в печати
❤225❤🔥66🎉36🕊9💘6💋5
обикаки сайлент хилл ф ау хитрый лис обито украл себе невесту ккши, подарил огромные убийственные лапки и маску и бесстыдно тайно симпит по нему (пока сам ккши не смотрит)
❤248❤🔥68🔥40🍓8💘3💋2
всем привет так получилось, что тильт, потеря близкого человека и дедлайны с головой забрали меня, что совсем не было времени до соцсетей и рисования мы с подружками воспылали и вернули древнюю обсессию по наруте, в частности обкк, придумали с яшенькой ау с обито екаем в магме, а госпожа лесечька написала по ней потрясающий фанфик🌟 — Обито, — дрогнувшим голосом повторил он спешно и со всей силы вдарил по ледяной г…
❤156❤🔥48💘22💋6🥰3🙏3💅2🔥1
леонард "сиськи нараспашку" митчелл для моей любимой женщины
🥰255❤🔥86❤74💘6🍓5💋2
С днем рождения мою самую дорогую чудесную жену, спасибо тебе за прекрасные совместные моменты 💋💋💋 люблю тебя безмерно, любимая моя женщина
💋59❤🔥15❤13💘2
друзья, наконец-то мне исполнилось 18!! интересно, что за год с прошлого 18-летия у меня появилась новая аудитория, я стала писать по лотму и чаще болтать на канале. двигаемся все дальше от социофобии!! можете поздравить меня с пятидесятым совершеннолетием в комментариях, похвалить фанфики и скетчи, подписаться на мой творческий аккаунт и просто тоже приятно провести день </3 найти мои фанфики вы можете: ✨ на ао3 (…
💋41❤11❤🔥8💘6
(очень) запоздалый, но супер кайфовый трейд с потрясающим персонажем моро 🎀
💋187❤69❤🔥41🍓13🔥5💘4🕊1🥰1
сегодня у меня день рождения! ❤️ и сегодня числом своего возраста я стала ближе к богу чем когда либо была или буду 😂 как сказала моя дорогая подруга Настя: "скоро ты переживешь Иисуса", а поэтому я очень постараюсь так и поступить 👍 спасибо, что остаетесь со мной, мне очень очень приятно знать, что мое творчество интересно такому количеству самых замечательных людей! ваша поддержка и добрые комментарии всегда спас…
❤44💘12💔9❤🔥6
Showing the 11 most recent of 11 posts we hold for @ottozs1. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Citation-graph rank — 1,178,450 of 1,340,412entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“ottozs 🪷🔪” (@ottozs1), 1,990 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ottozs1.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.