Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Отрофилгино

@otrofilgino

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

135subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001765043758
TypeChannel
Username@otrofilgino
DescriptionВозрастное ограничение: 16+ Место, где оживают фантазии Правила для заказчиков: https://otrofilgino.carrd.co/
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live8 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/otrofilgino

Growth

1357 August 2026 — 135 subscribers8 August 2026 — 135 subscribers7 August 20268 August 2026
2 measurements spanning 2 days. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 134–136 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
8 Aug 2026, 23:46135no change
7 Aug 2026, 04:17135first reading

Engagement

14 posts held, back to 3 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
73.0%
avg views ÷ 135 subscribers
Avg views / post
98.5
10 posts measured
Reaction rate
18.3%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
10
of 14 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 2 August 2026
Posts held14 (3 July 20262 August 2026)
Views total985
Reactions total180
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken8 Aug 2026, 23:46 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
866
Videos
29
Links
45

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

283 reactions across 14 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 46.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
13146.3%
custom 53078040227264674655318.7%
custom 53392627597941231865017.7%
custom 53910252503789868544917.3%

Custom emoji. 3 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 14 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 283reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 14 most recent posts we hold, published 3 July 2026 to 2 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 14 we hold a reading for · 7%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @otrofilgino. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 14 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 3 July 2026 to 2 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

2 Aug 2026, 20:05 UTC43 views15 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Благодарю за звездочки☀️

6custom 53392627597941231866custom 53910252503789868542custom 53078040227264674651

1 Aug 2026, 14:40 UTC55 views24 reactions1 Starread 8 August 2026
Photo

Пока участники собираются в чатик, покажу вам промежуточек ☀️ Остался уставший Кроули и сам фон 🌺

12custom 53078040227264674656custom 53392627597941231864custom 53910252503789868542

31 Jul 2026, 09:33 UTC72 views3 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Завтра в 14:00 по Мск закрываю набор ☀️

custom 53392627597941231862custom 53078040227264674651

30 Jul 2026, 15:01 UTC81 views32 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

🦦

21custom 53078040227264674657custom 53910252503789868543custom 53392627597941231861

30 Jul 2026, 11:07 UTC84 views24 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Задумка такова 😈 В целом, Кроули медвежоночек. Вот 🤪 Возможно, не супер-оригинально, но захотелось

13custom 53078040227264674655custom 53910252503789868545custom 53392627597941231861

29 Jul 2026, 07:53 UTC87 views16 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Набор проходит до конца субботы 🔥 ❤️Если были еще желающие — не пропустите дедлайн❤️

10custom 53078040227264674653custom 53392627597941231863

27 Jul 2026, 06:51 UTC104 views9 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

В щп-канале показала всех мужчин, которых рисовала за последние годы. Если кто-то хочет посмотреть — добро пожаловать ☀️ А чуть позже будет подборка с женскими персонажами 😃

4custom 53392627597941231863custom 53078040227264674652

22 Jul 2026, 08:25 UTC135 views7 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Еще 4 человечка ☀️ Откликнитесь, пожалуйста

custom 539102525037898685441custom 53078040227264674651custom 53392627597941231861

20 Jul 2026, 22:50 UTC177 views31 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Вот так вот 👀 Мотылек для @milko_tyan🌾

custom 5307804022726467465148custom 53392627597941231866custom 53910252503789868543

20 Jul 2026, 14:55 UTC147 views19 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Начало на реквест для @milko_tyan положено 🦋🦋🦋

custom 539102525037898685476custom 53078040227264674654custom 53392627597941231862

13 Jul 2026, 22:11 UTC194 views32 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

🖤🖤🖤🖤🖤 #PortfolioDay

17custom 53910252503789868547custom 53392627597941231866custom 53078040227264674652

13 Jul 2026, 15:57 UTC139 views32 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Бриана Вайс для @Poisontulpa ☀️

15custom 53392627597941231868custom 53910252503789868547custom 53078040227264674652

Showing the 12 most recent of 14 posts we hold for @otrofilgino. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 275,094 of 1,350,102entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Отрофилгино” (@otrofilgino), 135 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/otrofilgino.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.