Channel
@osorgindb
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
24subscribers
+1 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002394141048 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @osorgindb |
| Created | 30 October 2024 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post |
| First recorded | 11 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 15 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 15 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/osorgindb |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 15 Aug 2026, 02:13 | 24 | +1 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 11:32 | 23 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 20:04 | 23 | first reading |
7 posts held, back to 30 October 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 7 posts for this entry, the most recent from 16 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
42 reactions across 6 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 66.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🔥 | 28 | 66.7% | |
| ❤ | 9 | 21.4% | |
| ❤🔥 | 5 | 11.9% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 6 of the 7 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 42reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 7 most recent posts we hold, published 30 October 2024 to 16 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
«Клиент всегда (не) прав» — с этой темой в мае мы залетели на «Прожектор» к ребятам из @sistersagency Планировали уложиться в час, а в итоге провели вместе два уютных пятничных вечера в Зуме. Разбирались, какие клиенты бывают и как с ними эффективно взаимодействовать. Разумеется, на примерах из реального опыта. На второй встрече даже успели попрактиковаться в игре по ролям! В общем, тема оказалась слишком живой, что…
🔥6❤4❤🔥2
Привет! Мы — бюро ОСОРГИН. Наша страсть — дизайн цифровых продуктов и опыт взаимодействия человека с ними. У нас есть твердое убеждение, что этот опыт не ограничивается экраном смартфона. Поэтому последние 4 года мы не только работаем над дизайном приложений и систем. Мы помогаем органично встроить их в жизни клиентов или сотрудников бизнеса. Проще говоря: делаем так, чтобы продукты не бесили людей и не сжирали бюд…
❤4
12–13 сентября я выступлю в Оренбурге на Merge + IT Fest Oren — это два больших IT-события, собранные на одной площадке. Мероприятие приурочено ко дню программиста, но будет полезно всем, кто связан с цифровыми продуктами. Да, даже если ваш бизнес не про ИТ, но у вас есть сайт или приложение, вы продвигаетесь в сети, или просто ищете возможности — вы наверняка найдете что-то для себя 😉 Например, у меня там будет ин…
🔥5❤1
КАК ДИЗАЙНЕРУ ЛЮБИТЬ ЗАКАЗЧИКА? Вторая часть рассуждений о гуманистическом дизайне Заказчик в нашем случае — это, как правило, бизнес или государство. За приложением или сайтом он приходит не из тяги к прекрасному. Ему эти продукты нужны для решения каких-то своих, совершенно конкретных задач. Чтобы было проще, остановимся на заказчике от мира бизнеса (самый распространенный случай). Так вот, задача у бизнес-заказчи…
🔥6
ПРО ГУМАНИСТИЧЕСКИЙ ДИЗАЙН Однажды я написал, что у нас бюро гуманистического дизайна. Эта конструкция пришла мне на ум как-то случайно, когда я хотел подчеркнуть особенность нашего подхода. О чем это? Гуманистический дизайн — это про дизайн с любовью к человеку. В первую очередь — к человеку, для которого мы и дизайним все эти приложения, сайты и прочие цифровые продукты. Как говорится, это — база. И эту базу пр…
🔥4
Бюро гуманистического дизайна приложений и сложных цифровых продуктов. Погружаемся в ваш проект как в свой собственный, чтобы достичь наилучшего результата для вашего бизнеса. Возьмем на себя всю работу по подготовке и реализации проекта: проведем аналитику, разработаем дизайн, протестируем прототип с вашей аудиторией и поможем разработчикам реализовать все точно так, как задумано в проекте. Поможем вам как при соз…
🔥7❤🔥3
Channel created
Showing the 7 most recent of 7 posts we hold for @osorgindb. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 104,901 of 1,478,351entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“ОСОРГИН | Бюро цифровых решений” (@osorgindb), 24 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/osorgindb.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.