بسم الله الرحمن الرحیم
🤩1🥰1

Channel
@osnitbazaniran
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
807subscribers
-1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001622877778 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @osnitbazaniran |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 15 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 15 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/osnitbazaniran |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 15 Aug 2026, 00:37 | 807 | -2 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 12:45 | 809 | +1 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 01:34 | 808 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 16:12 | 808 | first reading |
7 posts held, back to 1 November 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 7 posts for this entry, the most recent from 14 June 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
13 reactions across 7 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 23.1% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 3 | 23.1% | |
| 🔥 | 2 | 15.4% | |
| ☃ | 1 | 7.69% | |
| 🎃 | 1 | 7.69% | |
| 👻 | 1 | 7.69% | |
| 💔 | 1 | 7.69% | |
| 😇 | 1 | 7.69% | |
| 😨 | 1 | 7.69% | |
| 🤩 | 1 | 7.69% | |
| 🥰 | 1 | 7.69% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 7 of the 7 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 13reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 7 most recent posts we hold, published 1 November 2025 to 14 June 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
بسم الله الرحمن الرحیم
🤩1🥰1
شما می تونید کدوم باشید؟
The shares total 109%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
☃1
Signed Haj Heydar
از کانال های قدیمی هست که دوباره برگشته پوشش اخباری دنیای سایبری و گروه های هکری ↙ https://t.me/Cyber_News_ir کسانی که تیم یا گروه سایبری دارن میتونن برای پوشش اخبارشون ارتباط برقرار کنن.. #OSINT ----------❤❤️🔥🔥------------------------------ Like - Forward @HajOsint
❤1😇1
Signed Haj Heydar
دسترسی به کانالهای ه/ک، امنیت و OSINT اگر به دنبال محتوای باکیفیت در زمینه امنیت سای/بری و جمعآوری اطلاعات (OSINT) هستید، این مجموعه برای شماست. شامل کانالهای فعال در زمینه امنیت، آموزشهای عملی، ابزارهای کاربردی و جدیدترین اخبار این حوزه میشود. تمام محتواها به صورت منظم بهروزرسانی میشوند و دسترسی به آنها بسیار ساده است. دیگر نیازی به جستجوی وقتگیر در کانالهای مختلف نخواهید داشت. همین حالا میتوانید به این…
💔1
Signed Haj Heydar
Photo, posted without a caption
🎃1
Signed Haj Heydar
ابزار نظارت متنباز Open Source Surveillance نیاز به VPN ━ ━ ━ ━ ━ ━ ━ ━ ━ ◾ ویژگیها 📱 رسانههای اجتماعی: 📍 چالش موقعیت جغرافیایی بر اساس عکسهای رسانههای اجتماعی 🏗️ جمعآوری اطلاعات در مورد زیرساختهای حیاتی 🕒 ردیابی رویدادها در زمان واقعی ⚙️ پیادهسازی ماژولهای جدید 🔑 مجموعه حسابها و کلیدهای API 📹 دوربینها: 🎯 دوربینهای ردیابی در تأسیسات حساس 📡 دریافت فید زنده ⚙️ پیادهسازی ماژولهای جدید ➕ اضافه کردن دستگ…
🔥2❤1👻1
Signed Haj Heydar
Photo, posted without a caption
❤1😨1
Signed Haj Heydar
Showing the 7 most recent of 7 posts we hold for @osnitbazaniran. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
شما می تونید کدوم باشید؟
The shares total 109%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 7 most recent posts we hold, published 1 November 2025 to 14 June 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“کانال اوسینت بازان” (@osnitbazaniran), 807 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/osnitbazaniran.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.