Channel
@osmohappynews
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
253subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001947279876 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @osmohappynews |
| Created | Between 1 April 2023 and 31 October 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 2 times, most recently 14 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/osmohappynews |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 7 Aug 2026, 13:48 | 253 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 03:01 | 253 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 6 November 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 9 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
5 reactions across 3 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 60.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 3 | 60.0% | |
| ❤ | 2 | 40.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 4 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 5reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 6 November 2025 to 9 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Osmosis Pay 카드에 대한 업데이트입니다. Cypher, Osmosis Pay 카드의 제공업체는 NiumGlobal 에 인수되고 있으며, 카드 플랫폼을 종료하고 있습니다. 카드에 자금을 보유하고 있다면, 알아두셔야 할 사항은 다음과 같습니다. 주요 날짜: • 카드 충전이 이제 비활성화되었습니다. • 2026년 8월 7일: 카드 사용 마지막 날 • 2026년 9월 6일: 플랫폼이 영구적으로 폐쇄되며, 출금 기간이 종료됩니다 9월 6일 이전에 남은 자금을 출금해 주세요.
🫵코스모스 허브 제안서 업데이트 검증인(Validator) 및 커뮤니티의 피드백을 반영하여 코스모스 허브 제안서를 수정하였습니다. 1. 가장 큰 변화: ATOM 추가 발행(Mint) 없음 기존 계획과 달리, 새로운 ATOM을 추가로 발행하지 않습니다. 2. 자금 조달 방식의 변경 허브 커뮤니티 풀(Community Pool) 이외에 필요한 ATOM은 다음과 같은 방식으로 조달됩니다. 프로토콜 수익 활용: DEX(탈중앙화 거래소)에서 발생하는 프로토콜 수익을 사용하여 시간이 지남에 따라 점진적으로 조달합니다. 공개 시장 매입: 해당 수익으로 공개 시장에서 ATOM을 직접 매수하여 OSMO → ATOM 전환 자금을 충당합니다. 3. 기대 효과 성과 연동형 구조: 실제 실현된 프로토콜 수익을 통해 자금을 확보하므로 성과에 기…
😢
Photo, posted without a caption
👍COSMOSIS (오스모시스-코스모스 허브 합병) 목적: 코스모스 생태계의 유동성 엔진(오스모시스)을 허브로 흡수해, ATOM의 가치와 수익성을 직접 확보하려는 전략적 통합. 방식: 오스모시스의 모듈과 유동성을 코스모스 허브로 이식. OSMO 토큰은 ATOM으로 전환하여 생태계를 하나로 일원화. OSMO 보유자는 6개월간의 전환 기간 동안 정해진 비율로 제안서 내 스왑 비율(0.0355 ATOM = 1.998 OSMO)로 변경! 현재 초안(DRAFT) 단계이며, 향후 거버넌스 논의 과정에서 해당 수치 수정과 경제적 타당성 검증이 필수적임.
👍
@JohnnyWyles posted in Withdraw and Burn Levana Liquidity This proposal requests the withdrawal of OSMO currently deployed from the community pool funding to Levana, and the sending of the recovered OSMO to the null address to burn these tokens. Motivation The Levana Foundation is winding down, as announced in their recent blog post, resulting in a shift of Levana Perps into maintenance only. The original community …
@Mirage posted in Mirage: unstoppable social infrastructure, built on mirage-1, now live on IBC Hey Everyone! We’re building Mirage, a decentralized discussion network designed to be social infrastructure that can’t be switched off. A real alternative to Reddit and other social platforms which are slowly eroding due to power tripping moderators/corrupt governments.. we build mirage as no single company, server, or m…
@Greystoneinc posted in Replace Axelar with Gravity Bridge as Osmosis’s Default Bridge This proposal recommends Osmosis change its default cross chain bridge from Axelar to Gravity Bridge to improve user safety by reducing centralization and cross chain attack surface. A governance vote is forthcoming; stakeholders should review and prepare to vote. Why this matters Risk to users: Many users assume Axelar is trust…
@cryptocapital posted in USDC-LUNA slippage(supercharge this pool) Iam using osmosis platform since 1 year. Its been the great experience overall no issues at all. I explore and found different strategies around crypto market and see what suits me. I want to stake my assets to liquidity alliance erisprotocol for a time being. In mapofzones if we see terra ranks in top 10 from many weeks but we can’t move due to low …
🍀 Osmosis 현재까지 12.1M 소각 !
👍3
@Osmosis_Grants posted in Osmosis Grants Renewal Osmosis Grants Program Renewal Summary We propose extending the Osmosis Grants Program (“OGP)” for a further 12 months, until January 8th, 2027. There will be no major changes to the program. The program will continue its historical focus - aimed at funding Osmosis contributors, infrastructure partners, strategic partnerships, and more. Given market conditions, we…
❤1
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @osmohappynews. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 1,123,089 of 1,481,346entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@osmohappynews named 6 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“오스모시스(Osmosis) 한국 소식방🤗” (@osmohappynews), 253 subscribers as measured 7 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/osmohappynews.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.