Channel
@orionmediacenter
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
1,025subscribers
-3 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001547952867 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @orionmediacenter |
| Created | Between 1 August 2021 and 28 February 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 5 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 14 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/orionmediacenter |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 14 Aug 2026, 17:18 | 1,025 | -1 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 03:56 | 1,026 | -1 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 01:25 | 1,027 | -1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 02:00 | 1,028 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 01:54 | 1,028 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 16 October 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 3 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (16 October 2024 – 3 August 2026) |
| Views total | 880 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 7 Aug 2026, 02:00 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
12 reactions across 8 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 83.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 10 | 83.3% | |
| ❤ | 2 | 16.7% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 8 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 12reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 16 October 2024 to 3 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
👀 Neste interrogatório explosivo no Congresso dos EUA (legendas em português disponíveis), o senador Rand Paul confronta Anthony Fauci sobre a verdadeira origem do COVID-19, o financiamento de pesquisas de ganho de função no laboratório de Wuhan pelo NIH e NIAID, e o encobrimento do envolvimento do governo americano na pandemia. Fauci é questionado sobre o projeto DEFUSE, a furina no SARS-CoV-2, os e-mails deletados …
🚨Os Houthis voltaram a atacar uma rota estratégica do petróleo. Segundo relatos iniciais, um petroleiro saudita que seguia em direção a Jidá foi alvo de uma nova saraivada de foguetes no entorno do Estreito de Bab al-Mandeb. Essa passagem marítima liga o Mar Vermelho ao Golfo de Áden e é uma das rotas mais importantes do planeta para o transporte de petróleo, combustíveis e mercadorias entre o Oriente Médio, a Euro…
🇺🇸 EUA iniciam 13ª noite de bombardeios contra o Irã 🇮🇷 | Segundo relatos iniciais, áreas residenciais em Ahvaz foram atingidas. Há registros de ferimentos em civis em Bandar Abbas. A natureza das explosões levou analistas a sugerirem o emprego de bombardeiros, possivelmente B-1. 📲 Acompanhe as próximas atualizações.
🛢 Com a redução do tráfego no Estreito de Ormuz, o aumento dos riscos para a navegação e a escalada das tensões na região, o petróleo Brent voltou a ultrapassar a marca de US$ 100 por barril, reacendendo preocupações sobre o abastecimento global de energia e seus impactos na economia. ⛴ Três navios-tanque tentaram realizar a travessia; ocorreu uma explosão em uma das embarcações, segundo a IRGC. O navio-tanque Kavom…
A Orion Media Center está de volta. A partir de agora, este canal volta a acompanhar crises internacionais, a agenda geopolítica, ciência & tecnologia com especial interesse na 4º Revolução Industrial, além de levar a cabo publicações do blog COVID Revisitado. Nosso compromisso continua sendo oferecer informação contextualizada, baseada em fontes identificadas e com foco nas implicações estratégicas dos eventos int…
💉Era só nas vacinas? Elementos estranhos potencialmente danosos à saúde têm sido observados aos borbotões em anestesias e mesmo em remédios adquiridos corriqueiramente nas farmácias. Em sua palestra, o dentista Dr. Rubecy Oliveira expõe essa crise invisível na saúde pública e revela seus métodos de extração de contaminantes de anestésicos e reversão de processos de automontagem das nanotecnologias no sangue de indiví…
❤1
🔬EVIDÊNCIA INEGÁVEL: Dezenas de pesquisadores independentes pelo mundo confirmam nanotecnologias não-declaradas nas vacinas COVID 💉 – incluindo grafeno, centenas de elementos estranhos e estruturas auto-montantes. Comece a descobrir o que governos e corporações escondem, com base em análises científicas independentes e documentos confidenciais numa palestra exclusiva conectando pontos entre ciência, geopolítica e tra…
❤1
⚕️PALESTRA EXCLUSIVA DO 9º ENCONTRO DOCTORS FOR LIFE LIBERADA: A AGENDA OCULTA DO CONTROLE POPULACIONAL | Quem realmente está por trás das políticas de planejamento familiar e campanhas de vacinação com hCG antifertilidade? 📶 DESCUBRA CONEXÕES entre: 🌍 OMS, USAID e “filantropos” a programas de redução populacional 🧬 Margaret Sanger e a eugenia disfarçada de "direito reprodutivo" 💉 Vacinas da COVID e infertilidade 📉 N…
A 150a Live Comunica Médicos pela Vida debate as origens dos SARS-CoV-2, as lições e alertas que a pandemia deixou para o Brasil e o mundo. Uma conversa em alto nível com o biólogo PhD - Dr Daniel Lin e o Dr Jandir Loureiro, dois estudiosos da COVID e dos efeitos das injeções mRNA. Hoje terça-feira (13) às 20h30 no Canal do MPV: HTTPS://medicospelavidacovid19.com.br/live/ - YouTube: HTTPS://youtube.com/mpv.org.br.0…
👍1
🦠 A ORIGEM DO SARS-CoV-2: O QUE A CIÊNCIA JÁ SABIA 2 MESES APÓS A OMS DECLARAR PANDEMIA E QUE NÃO FOI REVELADO PUBLICAMENTE? 🎞️ Neste documentário exclusivo de 17/05/20, o biólogo pesquisador da Orion Media Center explorou: 🚨 O comportamento anômalo do governo e da mídia chinesa durante a explosão do surto no país 🧑🔬 A intensa pesquisa ao redor da compatibilidade das proteínas Spike aos receptores ACE2 humanos 🤒 Co…
👨⚕Médico revela como oligarcas manipulam saúde e alimentos para dominação global | Adepto de Medicina Chinesa e Terapia Reichiana, Dr. Lino Guedes Pires dá dicas de respiração, dieta anti-inflamatória e uso de plantas medicinais como resistência num ciclo de palestras envolvendo médicos e cientistas abordando temas como: infertilidade e reações adversas às 💉vacinas do COVID, cuidados com a saúde de vacinados, obriga…
💉 Vacinas que autorreplicam o próprio mRNA dentro das células se tornaram uma perigosa realidade! Nesta matéria especial, confira detalhes da aprovação da vacina de sa-mRNA auto-amplificadora KOSTAIVE pela Comissão Europeia, tais como funcionamento, aplicação, segurança nos ensaios clínicos, reações adversas graves e estágio dos ensaios de candidatas a mercado de diversas vacinas autorreplicantes. Com base em dados d…
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @orionmediacenter. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 887,904 of 1,481,502entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“🇧🇷 ORION MEDIA CENTER Pelo Bem-Estar das Gerações Futuras” (@orionmediacenter), 1,025 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/orionmediacenter.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.