Récemment je me suis beaucoup formé pour avoir un portefeuille d'investissement équilibré. En gros, le plus compliqué c'est de passé les 5 premières années (à partir de 2 ans on peut déjà avoir une certaine stratégie de sécurité), On dit que l'investissement est risqué, mais en moyenne, les personnes qui n'ont fait aucun investissement ont perdu plus que ceux qui ont investis à cause de l'inflation. Si on protège so…

Channel
Orientation Business en ligne
@orientation_business
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Posts · Polls · Cite this entry
534subscribers
+1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001332206356 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @orientation_business |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 16 June 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 22 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 5 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 22 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/orientation_business |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 22 Aug 2026, 11:09 | 534 | -3 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 20:04 | 537 | +5 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 17:37 | 532 | -1 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 03:50 | 533 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 22:51 | 533 | first reading |
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 16 June 2021 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 3 September 2024. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Recent posts
Voice message, posted without a caption
Voice message, posted without a caption
Voice message, posted without a caption
Voice message, posted without a caption
L'affiliation/le parrainage avec des pourcentages à vie reste pour moi le meilleur business
En ce moment j'essaye différents business. Le trading de cryptomonnaie j'ai pas aimé. J'ai perdu. Trop de risques et des frais dans chaque transaction. Je déconseille. Peut être que l'investissement long terme est mieux.
L'affiliation en publiant son lien partout ça ne fonctionne pas. Il faut une stratégie. Les affiliés qui font des millions ont généralement un site internet : TripAdvisor, Kayak... La quasi-totalité des sites de comparatifs. Sinon les chaînes YouTube ça fonctionne bien aussi. Pour les produits Pinterest. Dans une moindre mesure : Telegram/discord si on a une grande communauté.
J'ai trouvé des programmes pépites que je vous partagerais bientôt 😀 L'affiliation de logiciels, sites internet, formations... Services et produits virtuelles rapportent plus que l'affiliation de produits physiques.
Très bien la majorité des votes sont pour l'affiliation donc on va commencer par ça. Revenons aux bases : - L'affiliation c'est le fait de toucher de l'argent en faisant de la publicité en fonction des résultats. Il y a plusieurs types de rémunérations. En général c'est en fonction des ventes. Mais il peut y avoir de l'affiliation par lead ou par clic. Il existe aussi (mais rare) de l'affiliation multi niveaux (…
Quelles sujets t'intéressent?
- Affiliation51%
- Parrainages22%
- MLM12%
- Dropshipping41%
- Infopreunariat22%
- Crypto29%
- Immobilier35%
- Bourse20%
- Gestion financière / éducation financière27%
The shares total 259%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Depuis j'ai appris de nouvelles choses. Je m'y connais pas seulement en business en ligne désormais mais également en investissement et en gestion des finances personnelles.
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @orientation_business. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Quelles sujets t'intéressent?
- Affiliation51%
- Parrainages22%
- MLM12%
- Dropshipping41%
- Infopreunariat22%
- Crypto29%
- Immobilier35%
- Bourse20%
- Gestion financière / éducation financière27%
The shares total 259%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 16 June 2021 to 3 September 2024. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 22 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Orientation Business en ligne” (@orientation_business), 534 subscribers as measured 22 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/orientation_business.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.