π‘πΌΦ΄α―Φ΄π«πΏΦ΄ Δ±ΰΉπ π°lπ«πα§β Ύ
π³4π2π»1π1

Channel
@oreoGirlOff
On this record: Growth Β· Engagement Β· What this channel posts Β· Reactions Β· Posts Β· Polls Β· Citations Β· Cite this entry
23subscribers
+1 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register Β· movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1004373246987 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @oreoGirlOff |
| Description | ππ«κΝ πκ―πΌΦ΄π»π: @cute_entertainmentOff |
| Created | Between 1 June 2026 and 25 July 2026β estimated from Telegramβs id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 11 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 11 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| On Telegram | t.me/oreoGirlOff |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 11 Aug 2026, 12:15 | 23 | no change |
| 8 Aug 2026, 06:35 | 23 | +1 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 04:15 | 22 | first reading |
16 posts held, back to 25 July 2026 β the reader has not yet reached the start of this channelβs public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegramβs post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) Γ· viewsβ note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegramβs public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 9 of 16 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days Β· latest post in window 9 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 16 (25 July 2026 β 9 August 2026) |
| Views total | 1,432 |
| Reactions total | 65 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface β not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 11 Aug 2026, 12:15 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than βcorrectingβ the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form β 8.12K, 3.7M β so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded β read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegramβs own channel header, read 11 August 2026 β not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegramβs rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel β not this channelβs whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegramβs own rounded chrome, so it carries no β mark.
65 reactions across 9 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 29.2% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| π | 19 | 29.2% | |
| π | 18 | 27.7% | |
| π³ | 17 | 26.2% | |
| π» | 11 | 16.9% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities β π is thanks in one channel and mourning in another β so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one β 4.34K, 1.2M β so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 9 of the 16 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegramβs own count on each post β not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above β those same posts carry 65reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by βa reaction total printed elsewhere on the pageβ.
Measured over the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 25 July 2026 to 9 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
π‘πΌΦ΄α―Φ΄π«πΏΦ΄ Δ±ΰΉπ π°lπ«πα§β Ύ
π³4π2π»1π1
Sticker, posted without a caption
ππ€©π€πΏΦ΄α§π«π₯Ή#π°π«πα§πΏΦ΄π πβοΈπ π ππππΉΙΧ | πα§α§hΧπ« <π¨ π§οΈ βΏβπββΏ π§οΈ π₯ΉπΉπ«πΙΧ πΆπ»Χ β ΏΧ π π΅βΙΧ πΌπΏπ ππ π€©π πΏΦ΄α§πΌΦ΄π°πΔ±ΰΉπ«π»π π ππκ―lα§πΌΦ΄πα§ α―Φ΄π«π«ππ π
π5π³2π»2π1
Sticker, posted without a caption
πππ‘Π°Π±π«Ρ Π½πΌΦ΄ - π α§Π½α§Π΄ΠΆα§πΏΦ΄πΌΦ΄π π π§οΈ βΏβπββΏ π§οΈ π πβοΈπ π ππππΉΙΧ ππ«πΏΦ΄α§π« <π¨ ππ»πΈΦΉα§ππΌΦ΄ β’ α₯°α₯΄α₯±ΚΠ΄α§Π½α₯β² ΟΡα₯΄/α₯²Π½α΄¦α§. β’ Κα§α€Οα₯²α₯΄α΄ 11+ (00.00.0000) β’ Π½α₯² α₯΄ΞΊα§α§ΡΞΊα§ Ξ΄ΡΠ΄α₯±α΄α₯± α₯²ΞΊα΄α₯ΚΠ½Ρ? β’ Ρα₯²α₯΄α§Κα§α₯ α₯°α§Ρα₯΄ ⒠ᴦα§α΄α§ΚΡ ΚΡα₯°α§α§Π½Ρα΄Ρ Κα₯΄α₯± α§Ξ΄Ρα€α₯²Π½Π½α§α₯΄α΄α₯? β’ Π½α₯² α₯΄ΞΊα§α§ΡΞΊα§ α₯²α΄¦Οα₯±α₯΄α₯΄α₯ΚΠ½Ρ? β’ Π½α₯² α₯΄ΞΊα§α§ΡΞΊα§ α§Ξ΄Ρα₯α΄α₯±α§ΡΠ½Ρ? β’ Ρβ²α₯±α₯±α΄α₯± α₯°α§Π΄Π΄α₯±ΟΠΆα₯Κα₯²α΄Ρ? β’ Κα₯²Ι― Ρα€ (α₯΄ΞΊα§α₯°α₯Οα§Κα₯²α΄Ρ) β’ ΞΊα₯²ΞΊ Ρα₯²α₯΄α΄α§ ΚΡ Κ α₯΄α₯±α΄α₯? β’ α₯°α§Ρα₯±β²Ρ ΚΡΞ΄Οα₯²α§α₯ Π½α₯²α₯΄? β’ ΞΊα₯²ΞΊα§α₯± ΚΟα₯±β²Ρ Π΄α₯²Π΄α₯α΄α₯± ΡΡα₯²α₯΄α΄Π½α₯ΞΊα₯²β² Π½α₯² α€α₯²α₯°α₯α₯΄Ρ Π΄α₯±Ξ΄Ρα΄α₯²? ⒠ᴦα§α΄α§ΚΡ α₯°α§Π΄α₯°α₯α₯΄α₯²α΄Ρ ΞΊα§Π½β¦
π³2π»2π2π2
Sticker, posted without a caption
π π«πΈΦΉπΌΦ΄ Δ±ΰΉπ π³πΏΦ΄α§α§!
π3π³2π»1π1
ππ€© π©Δ±ΰΉβ Ύα§π«π#π§κΦΉπΦΉπ²_πΈΰΉπΉπΉπΈΰΉππ©΅ π π§οΈ βΏβπββΏ π§οΈ π πβοΈπ π ππππΉΙΧ ππ«πΏΦ΄α§π« <π¨ Χ πππΧβ Ύ π ππ«κΝ πκ―πΌΦ΄π»π -ππ ππβ’ ππΧπα§ (π) #π―ΰ‘πΌπ»Χπ± π π π§οΈ βΏβπββΏ π§οΈ π #Ι‘πΏπ«ππ½ #πΉπ«πΙΧ #Ι‘πΆπΏπΉ π€©π πΏΦ΄α§πΌΦ΄π°πΔ±ΰΉπ«π»π π π ππκ―lα§πΌΦ΄πα§ α―Φ΄π«π«ππ π
π³2π»2π2π2
Sticker, posted without a caption
ππ€© π©Δ±ΰΉβ Ύα§π«π#π§κΦΉπΦΉπ²_πΈΰΉπΉπΉπΈΰΉππ©΅ π π§οΈ βΏβπββΏ π§οΈ π πβοΈπ π ππππΉΙΧ ππ«πΏΦ΄α§π« <π¨ Χ πππΧβ Ύ π ππ«κΝ πκ―πΌΦ΄π»π -ππ ππβ’ ππΧπα§ (π) #π―ΰ‘πΌπ»Χπ± π π π§οΈ βΏβπββΏ π§οΈ π #Ι‘πΏπ«ππ½ #πΉπ«πΙΧ #Ι‘πΆπΏπΉ π€©π πΏΦ΄α§πΌΦ΄π°πΔ±ΰΉπ«π»π π π ππκ―lα§πΌΦ΄πα§ α―Φ΄π«π«ππ π
π4π³1π»1π1
Sticker, posted without a caption
πΠπΌΦ΄ πΈΦΉπ«Π³π« πκ―π«β ΎπΌΦ΄Π»Δ±ΰΉ?π
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
π³2π2π1
Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @oreoGirlOff. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked β was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it β t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so β1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A pollβs figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
πΠπΌΦ΄ πΈΦΉπ«Π³π« πκ―π«β ΎπΌΦ΄Π»Δ±ΰΉ?π
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only β there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each optionβs share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each optionβs own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 25 July 2026 to 9 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind β an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results β and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank β 372,440 of 1,176,251entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below β republished posts weigh more than named mentions β and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channelβs name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page β a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 2 registered channels β every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched β that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting todayβs namer to yesterdayβs owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason β naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides β the βNamed by N registered channelsβ figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 β this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
ββΊΛ π€πΏΙΧ π« // ππΌπ»Χπ± ΰ³β (@oreoGirlOff), 23 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/oreoGirlOff.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV Β· JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.