Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Ordinary Statism

@ordinary_statism

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

2,121subscribers

+35 since we began measuring on 10 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002406329179
TypeChannel
Username@ordinary_statism
CreatedBetween 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded10 August 2026
Last confirmed live15 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 15 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/ordinary_statism

Growth

2,0862,1212,103.510 August 2026 — 2,086 subscribers11 August 2026 — 2,105 subscribers15 August 2026 — 2,121 subscribers10 August 202615 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 5 days, net +35. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 2,081–2,126 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
15 Aug 2026, 16:252,121+16
11 Aug 2026, 21:222,105+19
10 Aug 2026, 22:152,086first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 28 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
74.4%
avg views ÷ 2,121 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,580
20 posts measured
Reaction rate
6.38%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
20
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 10 August 2026
Posts held20 (28 July 202610 August 2026)
Views total31,545
Reactions total2,011
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken10 Aug 2026, 22:15 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
57s
Average length
57s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

2,011 reactions across 20 posts, in 21 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 44.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
😁88744.1%
custom 517466931367981950326012.9%
custom 524016344607021503624912.4%
custom 53505419924535010621216.02%
custom 52468920492103123731115.52%
custom 5305422867087765972884.38%
653.23%
🤣552.73%
custom 5336942450957106389452.24%
🔥412.04%
custom 5368403185184567948331.64%
🙏211.04%
💯120.597%
🌚70.348%
😭40.199%
😱40.199%
💔20.099%
🥰20.099%
🥴20.099%
10.05%
1 further kind10.05%

Custom emoji. 7 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2,011reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 28 July 2026 to 10 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
3
across the posts below
Posts paid on
2
of 20 we hold a reading for · 10%
Most on one post
2
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @ordinary_statism. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 28 July 2026 to 10 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

10 Aug 2026, 20:59 UTC368 views54 reactionsread 10 August 2026

Вышло быстрее, чем у Штефанюка. Цените. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-tqlIFe5c6U

custom 5240163446070215036359custom 51746693136798195037custom 53505419924535010622😁1

10 Aug 2026, 18:34 UTC712 views68 reactionsread 10 August 2026

Так называемая либеральная оппозиция.

🤣47custom 524016344607021503613😁43🌚1

10 Aug 2026, 18:31 UTC815 views79 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

Думаешь люди с такими фамилиями собираются возвращать кому-то деньги?

custom 524016344607021503651😁20🌚51🤨1custom 51746693136798195031

10 Aug 2026, 16:53 UTC≈1,990 views125 reactionsread 10 August 2026

Насколько нужно трястись, чтобы снять с выборов самых беззубых соевых либералов в истории России, поддерживаемых исключительно зумерами младше 18 лет в тиктоке..

😁87custom 5174669313679819503109custom 53505419924535010627💯4😭4custom 52401634460702150363🤣1

8 Aug 2026, 15:14 UTC≈1,100 views105 reactionsread 10 August 2026

Не дай бог снимут. Придется в третий раз переделывать единственный правдивый ролик на ютубе про Яблоко..

😁72🙏15custom 52401634460702150369custom 51746693136798195036custom 535054199245350106221

7 Aug 2026, 14:33 UTC≈1,480 views123 reactionsread 10 August 2026

Вы слишком неправильно голосуете..

😁80custom 524016344607021503629custom 53684031851845679485custom 51746693136798195034custom 535054199245350106241

7 Aug 2026, 14:27 UTC≈1,460 views71 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Poll

За кого вы отдадите голос на осенних выборах?

  1. Единая Россия10%
  2. КПРФ2%
  3. Новые Люди20%
  4. ЛДПР5%
  5. Яблоко32%
  6. Другая партия2%
  7. Не буду голосовать28%

Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

custom 517466931367981950339custom 524016344607021503616custom 5350541992453501062133

7 Aug 2026, 14:22 UTC≈1,700 views118 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

Яблоко далеко не единственная фракция, выступающая Za Мир. Голосуй за Единую Россию. Поддержи антивоенную партию.

custom 517466931367981950379😁236custom 53505419924535010626😱21🌚1

5 Aug 2026, 10:32 UTC≈1,660 views131 reactionsread 10 August 2026

По итогам жеребьевки в ЦИКе Яблоко поместили на второе место, а Новых Людей на последнее. Вот и думайте кто тут конторский.

😁92custom 524016344607021503619custom 536840318518456794811custom 517466931367981950352💯2

5 Aug 2026, 10:32 UTC≈1,420 views72 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Forwarded from @ateobreaking

ЦИК РФ, после жеребьевки, утвердила порядок размещения партий в бюллетене на выборах в Госдуму: ©️ Единая Россия ©️ Яблоко ©️ ЛДПР ©️ Партия прямой демократии ©️ Зелёные ©️ Справедливая Россия ©️ Родина ©️ КПРФ ©️ Партия Пенсионеров ©️ Коммунисты России ©️ Новые Люди

custom 517466931367981950349😁12custom 535054199245350106253custom 53684031851845679483

2 Aug 2026, 15:22 UTC≈1,980 views138 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

Так выглядят 50 iq в действии. Эти люди ходят с вами по одним улицам.

😁99custom 533694245095710638928custom 53505419924535010627😱21custom 53684031851845679481

2 Aug 2026, 15:19 UTC≈2,000 views106 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Video

Клим Жуков жёстко о колхозах. И ведь ничего не щелкнуло.

😁80custom 533694245095710638917💯61custom 51746693136798195031custom 52401634460702150361

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @ordinary_statism. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

7 Aug 2026, 14:27 UTCAnonymous Poll707 voters

За кого вы отдадите голос на осенних выборах?

  1. Единая Россия10%
  2. КПРФ2%
  3. Новые Люди20%
  4. ЛДПР5%
  5. Яблоко32%
  6. Другая партия2%
  7. Не буду голосовать28%

Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

30 Jul 2026, 12:34 UTCAnonymous Poll803 voters

Тема следующего ролика, можно выбрать несколько вариантов. Голосуй или проиграешь.

  1. Что на самом деле происходит с партиями в РФ?33%
  2. Культурный марксизм41%
  3. Почему русские не рожают(и не будут)36%
  4. Меритократия на практике - Сингапур34%
  5. Смерть Западной Европы - цифры демографического замещения37%
  6. Обыкновенный этатизм. Почему сильное государство - это круто52%

The shares total 233%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 28 July 2026 to 10 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,259,095 of 1,480,688entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Ordinary Statism” (@ordinary_statism), 2,121 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ordinary_statism.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.