Channel
@orchatnik
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
25subscribers
+2 since we began measuring on 9 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1003815294760 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @orchatnik |
| Created | Between 1 February 2026 and 26 July 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 11 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 27 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 27 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/orchatnik |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 27 Sept 2026, 08:17 | 25 | +1 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 09:06 | 24 | +1 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 11:31 | 23 | no change |
| 9 Aug 2026, 02:00 | 23 | first reading |
14 posts held, back to 26 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 14 posts for this entry, the most recent from 8 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
118 reactions across 14 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 47.5% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 56 | 47.5% | |
| 🔥 | 24 | 20.3% | |
| 🥰 | 16 | 13.6% | |
| 😱 | 9 | 7.63% | |
| 🤔 | 6 | 5.08% | |
| 👏 | 4 | 3.39% | |
| 🤯 | 2 | 1.69% | |
| 😁 | 1 | 0.847% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 14 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 118 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 14 most recent posts we hold, published 26 July 2026 to 8 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Я немного пропал, очень уж социально подвижные недели выдались, мне как обычно нужно после этого некоторое время "посмотреть в стену". Плюс после отпуска у меня всегда гора работы. Из крысиных новостей: они совсем подружились, ура! P.S. А в лес я сегодня так и не уехал, хотя планировал. P.P.S. Начинаю задумываться позаписывать акустику да выложить. "Стихи", "Парейдолии" и всякое, что с "What For?" мы вряд ли будем…
❤5🥰3🔥2
К крысиным новостям: знакомьтесь, это Мистер Хайд (первое фото). У него был очень нервный месяц, так что он отобрал у всех гамак и вырубился на полвечера, пока остальные знакомились (ну как, знакомились: Иви носилась как угорелая по всей комнате, сея вокруг хаос и разрушения, а Джекил безуспешно пытался от неё хоть где-нибудь спрятаться). Хайд довольно крупный, немного кудрявый и пока что очень спокойный. На втором…
🥰8🔥4👏3
С возвращением, старый друг, давно не виделись (если это ты, конечно, а то вы все одинаковые)
❤4🔥2👏1😁1
Ничего так отыграли, особенно учитывая, что последняя репетиция у нас была в июне))
🔥5❤3
Итак, я вернулся. Ездил я по крайне важному делу: вот этой даме слева на фото стукнул 91 год (она утверждает, что в таком случае нужно цифры читать справа налево, а значит, ей 19, не будем с ней спорить). Как вы тут?
❤7🔥4🥰3
Ах да. Обещанные подробности. Пятница, ГаражСарай, всё как обычно: 19:00, вход 500р. Играем вроде как первыми.
🔥5
Грустная новость: Греча больше не болеет. И больше мышевне-царевне не нужно спешить на ночную работу. С Гречей у нас была особая связь, меня к ней все ревновали. Очень люблю крыс, но век их не долог.
❤7😱3🤯2🥰2
Есть что-то глубоко символичное в монастыре, плавно перетекающем в военный госпиталь.
🤔6🔥2
И тут я выяснил, что Лета, как и Паствы нет в нормальной записи.
😱6
А вот в этой точке было придумано Лето. Облагородили, конечно, за двадцать лет знатно (да, эта песня настолько стара). Тут были заросли и тропинки. За спиной раньше стояла та самая башня, сейчас на её месте очередная спорт-арена.
❤4
Моя Альма-матер
❤7
Это тюзовский переход. Здесь я впервые стритовал по приколу. Кто ж тогда знал, что я этим (и автостопом) буду жить несколько лет.
❤6
Showing the 12 most recent of 14 posts we hold for @orchatnik. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 27 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Орчатник” (@orchatnik), 25 subscribers as measured 27 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/orchatnik.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.