Posted without readable text
❤5👍3😱2

Channel
@optaanalyst
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
655subscribers
-1 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001498642957 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @optaanalyst |
| Created | Between 1 April 2019 and 30 September 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 22 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 22 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/optaanalyst |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 22 Aug 2026, 14:33 | 655 | -1 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 17:18 | 656 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 13:47 | 656 | first reading |
17 posts held, back to 27 November 2022 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 17 posts for this entry, the most recent from 15 August 2024. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
28 reactions across 8 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 46.4% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 13 | 46.4% | |
| 👍 | 9 | 32.1% | |
| 🤩 | 3 | 10.7% | |
| 😱 | 2 | 7.14% | |
| 🔥 | 1 | 3.57% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 10 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 28reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 27 November 2022 to 15 August 2024, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Posted without readable text
❤5👍3😱2
My personal recommendation about this channel 🤩 Best tipster in Telegram 🛩️ Join yourselves and look at the results, it really insane 🤯 https://t.me/+Hso3Mftei7NmNjJk
❤5🔥1
Just a normal Friday Evening in my VIP Group🏆🔥🔥🔥Entry in Main Group is free for this Weekend! Come in and test it Guys! Enter here: https://t.me/+3HFDhhqEUXE2MTAy
❤2
Do you guys want free VIP betting tips ? 10 picks posted on VIP telegram ; 2 free picks posted below telegram channel. #bettingtips #betoftheday #betting 👉 https://t.me/daily433tips
2 - Wout Weghorst has become the first ever substitute to score twice in a World Cup match for Netherlands. His equaliser was timed at 100:30 - the latest second half goal in a World Cup knockout stage game since Opta have exact goal times (from 1966). Saviour.
👍3
5/6 v 1/4 - Argentina have won the most penalty shootouts of any side in World Cup history (5 wins from 6), while only Spain (4) have lost more penalty shootouts at the World Cup than Netherlands (1 win from 4). Contrast.
👍2
1 - Morocco are looking to become the first African team to qualify for the semi-final of a World Cup tournament - each of the previous three African sides to reach a quarter-final were all eliminated at this stage: Cameroon in 1990, Senegal in 2002 and Ghana in 2010. Challenge.
👍1
Germany's pass network vs Costa Rica: very tight.
Two methods, but one of them won a football match (and a group).
❤1
Wins by African nations at #FIFAWorldCup tournaments: 1978: 1 🇹🇳 1982: 2 🇩🇿🇩🇿 1986: 1 🇲🇦 1990: 3 🇨🇲🇨🇲🇨🇲 1994: 2 🇳🇬🇳🇬 1998: 3 🇳🇬🇳🇬🇲🇦 2002: 4 🇸🇳🇸🇳🇨🇲🇿🇦 2006: 3 🇬🇭🇬🇭🇨🇮 2010: 4 🇬🇭🇬🇭🇿🇦🇨🇮 2014: 3 🇨🇮🇳🇬🇩🇿 2018: 3 🇸🇳🇳🇬🇹🇳 2022: 6 🇸🇳🇸🇳🇲🇦🇲🇦🇹🇳🇬🇭
🤩3
3rd - Hakim Ziyech 🇲🇦 is the third Moroccan player to score and provide an assist in a single FIFAWorldCup edition after Mustapha Hadji and Abdeljalil Hadda in 1998. Revival.
1 - Youssef En-Nesyri is the first historical Morocco player to score a goal in two different World Cup campaigns (2018 and 2022). Sign. #CANMOR #Qatar2022
Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @optaanalyst. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 1,047,974 of 1,621,120entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@optaanalyst named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 22 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“OptaAnalyst” (@optaanalyst), 655 subscribers as measured 22 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/optaanalyst.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.