Channel
@oprivetiks
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
561subscribers
-2 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001711555574 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @oprivetiks |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 31 March 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 13 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/oprivetiks |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 13 Aug 2026, 06:38 | 561 | -3 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 01:21 | 564 | +1 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 18:16 | 563 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 08:36 | 563 | first reading |
14 posts held, back to 26 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 14 (26 June 2026 – 5 August 2026) |
| Views total | 1,327 |
| Reactions total | 151 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 6 Aug 2026, 18:16 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
283 reactions across 14 posts, in 12 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 35.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 101 | 35.7% | |
| 🔥 | 81 | 28.6% | |
| ❤🔥 | 38 | 13.4% | |
| 👍 | 25 | 8.83% | |
| 💯 | 15 | 5.30% | |
| ⚡ | 6 | 2.12% | |
| 🤔 | 6 | 2.12% | |
| 🆒 | 5 | 1.77% | |
| 😍 | 3 | 1.06% | |
| 🌚 | 1 | 0.353% | |
| 💅 | 1 | 0.353% | |
| 🤯 | 1 | 0.353% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 14 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 283reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 14 most recent posts we hold, published 26 June 2026 to 5 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @oprivetiks. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 14 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 26 June 2026 to 5 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
внимание, ипотечники 🫡 сейчас будет урок бытовой финансовой грамотности, который противоречит тому, что пишут в интернете стандартный совет звучит так: «гасишь досрочно — уменьшай срок, а не платёж» и он правильный если уменьшить платёж, а не срок, банк снизит обязательную сумму - ты будешь отдавать меньше - тело кредита пойдёт медленнее - и в итоге ты отдашь больше процентов но у совета есть невидимое условие: о…
🔥9❤6🤔6👍3
Под моим постом про инхаус-команды завязалась крайне интересная дискуссия. Посчитаем деньги?) Хочу добавить ещё один угол, который не затронул в том посте. Я часто слышу: нанять двух спецов дешевле, чем платить агентству. Но давайте посчитаем. Директолог и аналитик (беру регионы и спецов мидл+) — по 100к на руки. Кажется, всего-то 200к. Но «100к на руки» и «100к с учётом налогов» — разные вещи. Чтобы выдать человек…
❤9🔥3👍1
наш дорогой друг Саша Сучков рассказывает в своем канале про математику найма агенства или штат применимо, в целом, к любому агенству 🤓 Саша классный и умный парень, мудрый предприниматель и лидер, я радуюсь, когда он приезжает в Москву и мы можем поболтать и про бизнес, и про жизнь возможно вы помните мой пост про кейс, как мы помогали Бюро Сучкова настроить управленческий учет один из наших любимейших проектов 💔
❤3
Photo, posted without a caption
❤5🔥3👍1
основатель клиники Фомина выложил разбор рекордного дня — 43,6 млн рублей за 29 июля целых десять слайдов с декомпозицией: 🟠структура выручки по направлениям, кто купил программы: 43% новые пациенты, 30% вернувшиеся после паузы больше месяца, 19% решились прямо на приёме 🟠2461 повторный пациент, 🟠средний чек 10 242 🟠конверсия колл-центра 78% даже при рекордной нагрузке и всё это разобрано внутренней ai-системой, у …
🔥16❤8👍6
занимаюсь математикой по приколу уже почти полгода, с репетитором прохожу программу старшей школы и универа и это смешно, потому что в школе математика была для меня больным местом 😕 да, я была отличницей но именно с математикой всегда было как-то на грани казалось, склад ума у меня не математический — я просто умею повторять то, что уже видела олимпиады вообще были другой лигой: там же надо мыслить "креативно", а …
❤🔥19❤11🔥10
знаете, что меня бесит? когда бренд продает подарочные сертификаты и выдумывает к ним правила 😡 «срок действия полгода», «не суммируется», «не возвращается», «не обменивается», «при луне в козероге не работает» так вот, друзья: это незаконно 📝 в россии сертификат юридически — это аванс: вы отдали деньги вперед, услугу еще не получили, а отказ вернуть аванс без оказания услуги закон не разрешает и никакая оферта, …
💯15❤12👍4🤯1
стартуем интенсив по финансам для агентств уже на этой неделе 😎 начнем, конечно же, с базы и сразу дадим шаблоны для заполнения собственно поэтому делаем отдельные коворкинги, где помогаем заполнять файлы присоединиться можно на этой неделе до четверга, а дальше мы уже уедем на поезде финансовой грамотности и вы нас не догоните 😄 записаться и быстро влиться через @ddiannoo
🔥10❤🔥7😍3
как подступиться к финансам в агентстве, если не знаешь с чего начать агентство — один из самых простых типов бизнеса с точки зрения финучёта: нет товарных остатков, нет сложной логистики и расчета себестоимости есть проекты, команда и расходы поэтому база здесь ставится относительно быстро — если знать с чего начать 🌹 мы обычно начинаем с двух таблиц: 🟠реестр проектов — стоимость, сроки, прямые расходы, маржа по к…
❤8❤🔥7🔥6🌚1💅1🆒1
вакансия! 🏆 у нашего прекрасного клиента Feerique вакансия джуна фин менеджера! нужно заполнять таблицы, финтабло, совместно с нашей командой подводить фин итоги ребята класс, проекты вау! есть возможность вырасти под нашим руководством 📈 подробности в сообщении ниже 🙏
⚡6❤6
креатив креативом, но cash flow сам себя не сведёт 👁 феерики ищут внимательного финансового менеджера — человека, который умеет держать цифры в порядке, таблицы в тонусе, а cash flow без приколов в конце месяца (такие мы скучные, да) если вы любите порядок, внимательны к деталям и не боитесь слов «ежемесячная отчётность» — то эта вакансия для вас
❤8
про рост, финмодели и то, почему финансы перестали держаться на одном человеке быстрый рост — это не всегда хорошо 🚙 когда бизнес масштабируется, компании часто теряют в эффективности: • нанимать нужно раньше, чем придёт выручка • вкладываться в маркетинг — пока непонятно, отобьётся ли • строить новую операционку под больший объём — и всё это одновременно а что если прогнозы не сбудутся, а штат уже раздут? именно …
🔥11❤7👍5🆒4
Showing the 12 most recent of 14 posts we hold for @oprivetiks. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 87,804 of 1,340,412entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“свет в конце экселя | Настя Ачилова” (@oprivetiks), 561 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/oprivetiks.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.