Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

ʿО ۪⃤ׂׅ𓏸 𝕺.𝖀҉𝐌

@opium_hs

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Stars · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

19subscribers

+3 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003819840009
TypeChannel
Username@opium_hs
Created27 February 2026measured — dated from the channel’s first post
First recorded11 August 2026
Last confirmed live11 August 2026
Measurements held3
On Telegramt.me/opium_hs

Growth

161917.56 August 2026 — 16 subscribers7 August 2026 — 19 subscribers11 August 2026 — 19 subscribers6 August 202611 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 5 days, net +3. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 16–19 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
11 Aug 2026, 16:3219no change
7 Aug 2026, 02:1619+3
6 Aug 2026, 12:0316first reading

Engagement

11 posts held, back to 27 February 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 11 posts for this entry, the most recent from 6 May 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Photos
2
Links
2

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 11 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
32
across the posts below
Posts paid on
5
of 10 we hold a reading for · 50%
Most on one post
27
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @opium_hs. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 11 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 27 February 2026 to 6 May 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

6 May 2026, 18:38 UTC553 views0 reactions2 Starsread 11 August 2026
Poll

🥹ㅤ| 𝗪𝗛𝗢 𝗔籅𝖱𝗘 𝗬𝗢𝗨 ¿¿ㅤㅤ. 🉃籅ㅤㅤ❜❜

  1. 𝐅𝐑𝐈𝐄𝐍𝐃7%
  2. 𝐒𝐓𝐑𝐀𝐍𝐆𝐄R25%
  3. 𝐋𝐎𝐕𝐄𝐑9%
  4. 𝐌𝐘 𝐅𝐀𝐍18%
  5. 𝐅𝐑𝐎𝐌 𝐅𝐋𝐎𝐎𝐃22%
  6. 𝐖𝐀𝐍𝐓 𝐓𝐎 𝐌𝐄𝐄𝐓 𝐖𝐈𝐓𝐇 𝐌𝐄18%

Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

6 May 2026, 18:38 UTC560 views0 reactions1 Starread 11 August 2026
Photo

🥹 金蘿𝅥︐ 𝟎𝟏. 𝕮𝐇۪𝗔𝐍𝄖❠𝐍𝝣𝐋 🤩 𝟎𝟐. 𝗣𝗥𝝧⃞࡙𝗝࡙𝖤𝗖𝗧 ۓۣ ִ𓈒 🥹💤▌❛ 🥹. 𝐏@𝐑𝐓 #𝐅𝐎𝐋𝐈𝗢ֲ 𝗢𝖥𝖥𝄖ㅤ❠

6 May 2026, 18:38 UTC508 views0 reactions1 Starread 11 August 2026
File

🪦𝆹𝅥 𝅄 ⵈ𝂅ׄ 𝗙𝗜𝄖ㅤ❠ㅤ籅𝗟𝗘 金蘿

6 May 2026, 18:38 UTC492 views0 reactions1 Starread 11 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

10 Mar 2026, 17:46 UTC891 views0 reactions27 Starsread 11 August 2026
Photo

ㅤ🖤🖤 🤩▐ 𝐊A𝐈𝐍E𝐒S 🪦🎁😻🤩 Incurável forma⠀ ( 𝗟𝗢𝗡𝗗𝗢𝗡. ) , sou feito de tudo aquilo que inferniza a alma e acalma a mente. 🥹 ─瑩 ֺ𝗔𝗡𝗢𝗡 𝁔. ۓۣ ִ𓈒 👋: 𝐈𝐍F𝐉 && ᅠꓭ𝗜𝗥𝗧ᅠ⛶𝅚𝗛𝗗ꓯ𝗬 :: 𝟐𝟐.03 🤩 ‘ 20?? 🍒 [ 🏁 ]金蘿𝅥︐

Showing the 11 most recent of 11 posts we hold for @opium_hs. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

6 May 2026, 18:38 UTCAnonymous Poll67 voters

🥹ㅤ| 𝗪𝗛𝗢 𝗔籅𝖱𝗘 𝗬𝗢𝗨 ¿¿ㅤㅤ. 🉃籅ㅤㅤ❜❜

  1. 𝐅𝐑𝐈𝐄𝐍𝐃7%
  2. 𝐒𝐓𝐑𝐀𝐍𝐆𝐄R25%
  3. 𝐋𝐎𝐕𝐄𝐑9%
  4. 𝐌𝐘 𝐅𝐀𝐍18%
  5. 𝐅𝐑𝐎𝐌 𝐅𝐋𝐎𝐎𝐃22%
  6. 𝐖𝐀𝐍𝐓 𝐓𝐎 𝐌𝐄𝐄𝐓 𝐖𝐈𝐓𝐇 𝐌𝐄18%

Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 11 most recent posts we hold, published 27 February 2026 to 6 May 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 703,808 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“ʿО ۪⃤ׂׅ𓏸 𝕺.𝖀҉𝐌” (@opium_hs), 19 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/opium_hs.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.