3 measurements spanning 8 days, net -1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 210–211 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
16 Aug 2026, 04:27
210
-1
8 Aug 2026, 11:01
211
no change
7 Aug 2026, 18:08
211
first reading
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 10 December 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
80.5%
avg views ÷ 210 subscribers
Avg views / post
169
3 posts measured
Reaction rate
—
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
3
of 20 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 19 July 2026
Posts held
20 (10 December 2025 – 19 July 2026)
Views total
507
Reactions total
—
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
8 Aug 2026, 11:01 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Reaction mix
9 reactions across 3 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 44.4% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
👍
4
44.4%
😭
2
22.2%
❤
1
11.1%
🔥
1
11.1%
🤷
1
11.1%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 3 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 9reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 10 December 2025 to 19 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
¿Qué opinas de la polémica medida de la FIFA de imponer "pausas de hidratación" en cada partido?
Que está bien, estamos a la mitad del verano y los ponen a jugar en áreas con mucho calor y humedad20%
Que está bien mientras le repongan completo el tiempo consumido durante las pausas de hidratación25%
No tiene sentido para mi, para eso es el medio tiempo39%
Yo opino que usan dichas pausas para meterse alguna sustancia que les permita meter un gol25%
Debería haber pausa para lavarse las manos51%
The shares total 160%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
No era necesario, solo uso plan y ya con eso estaban registradas a mi nombre7%
Esperaré un tiempo y decidiré con más calma qué hacer cuando esté cerca la fecha límite17%
No voy a registrar nada, no me importa si pierdo mi(s) linea(s), prefiero eso a que roben mi info28%
Sí pero solo una de mis líneas, las demás me da igual si se pierden7%
No tengo número personal, solo uso el del trabajo y ellos ya lo registraron0%
Ah caray, no sabía que era obligatorio7%
Lo iba a registrar pero alguien se me adelantó y lo registró antes que yo, ¿y ahora qué hago?3%
Me lavo las manos y que me contacten por otros medios en caso de que sea necesario45%
The shares total 135%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
The shares total 211%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Me lavo mis libertarias, multilaterales y legales manos anti intervencionismo24%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @opinapues. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The 6 most recent of 17 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
¿Qué opinas de la polémica medida de la FIFA de imponer "pausas de hidratación" en cada partido?
Que está bien, estamos a la mitad del verano y los ponen a jugar en áreas con mucho calor y humedad20%
Que está bien mientras le repongan completo el tiempo consumido durante las pausas de hidratación25%
No tiene sentido para mi, para eso es el medio tiempo39%
Yo opino que usan dichas pausas para meterse alguna sustancia que les permita meter un gol25%
Debería haber pausa para lavarse las manos51%
The shares total 160%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
No era necesario, solo uso plan y ya con eso estaban registradas a mi nombre7%
Esperaré un tiempo y decidiré con más calma qué hacer cuando esté cerca la fecha límite17%
No voy a registrar nada, no me importa si pierdo mi(s) linea(s), prefiero eso a que roben mi info28%
Sí pero solo una de mis líneas, las demás me da igual si se pierden7%
No tengo número personal, solo uso el del trabajo y ellos ya lo registraron0%
Ah caray, no sabía que era obligatorio7%
Lo iba a registrar pero alguien se me adelantó y lo registró antes que yo, ¿y ahora qué hago?3%
Me lavo las manos y que me contacten por otros medios en caso de que sea necesario45%
The shares total 135%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
The shares total 211%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 10 December 2025 to 19 July 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Encuestas anónimas para llevar” (@opinapues), 210 subscribers as measured 16 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/opinapues.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
