Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Открытые глаза

@openseyes

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry

1,131subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 12 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002495961495
TypeChannel
Username@openseyes
CreatedBetween 1 October 2024 and 31 March 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded12 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/openseyes

Growth

1,13112 Aug 2026, 01:16 — 1,131 subscribers12 Aug 2026, 01:30 — 1,131 subscribers12 Aug 2026, 01:1612 Aug 2026, 01:30
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,130–1,132 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 01:301,131no change
12 Aug 2026, 01:161,131first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 21 April 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 17 May 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Photos
4
Links
6

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

21 reactions across 7 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 66.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
1466.7%
🕊314.3%
😍29.52%
👍14.76%
💊14.76%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 8 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 21reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 21 April 2025 to 17 May 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

17 May 2025, 06:09 UTC530 views8 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Зумеры, постмодерн и массовая деградация: стоит ли спасаться? Иногда создаётся ощущение, что общество катится в бездну — особенно, если смотреть на поколение Z, выросшее на ТикТоке, в мемах и в постоянной смене смыслов. Всё становится ироничным, обесцененным. Постмодерн довёл всё до точки, где ничто не воспринимается всерьёз, а самоирония — последняя форма защиты от внутренней пустоты. Мы живём в эпоху, где ценност

8

Signed architector

13 May 2025, 03:37 UTC357 views1 reactionsread 12 August 2026

А еще, хотелось бы уточнить именно у вас, так скажем поработать с еле живой аудиторией… На какую тему вы хотите следующий пост? Было бы интересно почитать, так же выберу самые интересные предложения и распишу, что к чему.

1

Signed architector

13 May 2025, 03:35 UTC330 viewsread 12 August 2026

Ну, а если по факту, то вкладывайте деньги в квартиры и дома, ибо же цены на них растут не то что с годами, а чуть ли не с минутами. Тем более вы обеспечите жильем не только себя, но и своих детей, внуков и т.д….

Signed architector

13 May 2025, 03:33 UTC321 viewsread 12 August 2026

Когда инвестировал не в тот стартап… или как я стал спонсором чужих граблей. Есть особый вид боли — это не когда ты ударил мизинец об угол, а когда вложился в проект, а потом понимаешь: финансировал цирк, где клоуны не смешные, а директора нет. Ошибочное финансирование — это когда ты хотел поддержать «новый Uber для доставки еды дронами», а по факту получил: — дроны из Алиэкспресса, — еду из позавчера, — и фаундера

Signed architector

11 May 2025, 12:49 UTC225 viewsread 12 August 2026
Photo

День добрый ребят. Хочу вам порекомендовать своего товарища. Почему Товарищ? Просто я с ним вижу общие взгляды, чем-то похожи, и по свойски друг друга дополняем. Он не безразличен к чужим бедам, знает о чем говорит/пишет, и знает что делает. Многим их вас он и так известен, так что передавайте привет:) Добро пожаловать - https://t.me/zaurpodpisatsa Заур, салам :) (А так же желающие принять участие в движе, пишем

Signed architector

30 Apr 2025, 20:51 UTC401 views1 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Жду ваши отзывы в комментариях. Хочу чтобы они были честные и искренние. Я приму любую критику, ведь все мы можем судить, у каждого из нас - разные вкусы.

💊1

Signed ⛓️‍💥

30 Apr 2025, 20:38 UTC425 viewsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Часть 3 - Легальный код. Шик и Тень. Конец истории, жизнь после пережитого. Начало нового, только белый лист и доход. Ссылка для прочтения: https://teletype.in/@reconivv/legalcode https://teletype.in/@reconivv/legalcode https://teletype.in/@reconivv/legalcode

Signed ⛓️‍💥

30 Apr 2025, 20:38 UTC338 viewsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Часть 2 - Возвращение в Игру. История того самого проекта, что поменял жизни государств, людей, СМИ, да даже обычных жителей. Ссылка для прочтения: https://teletype.in/@reconivv/profail https://teletype.in/@reconivv/profail https://teletype.in/@reconivv/profail

Signed ⛓️‍💥

30 Apr 2025, 14:09 UTC222 viewsread 12 August 2026

Жду отзывы об книге в комментарии, хочется услышать живое мнение, если соберем большое количество положительных, будет вторая часть.

Signed ⛓️‍💥

30 Apr 2025, 10:04 UTC262 viewsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Тень среди теней или Путь случайно выжившего героя. История, что начинается в Польше, обрываясь в Берлине, обретает новый смысл в Праге. Книга, была написана по мотивам моей жизни. Я не хочу уходить от вас, не оставив вам подарка, так что данная книга, послужит утешительным призом. Надеюсь она заинтересует тебя как читателя, как человека, что готов прочесть эту книгу и пережить со мной эти моменты в своей голове.

Signed ⛓️‍💥

27 Apr 2025, 11:15 UTC323 views1 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Казино и лудомания Мир азарта всегда манил человека обещаниями легких денег, острых ощущений и иллюзией успеха. Казино — одно из самых ярких воплощений этой мечты. Красочные огни, мерцающие автоматы, рулетки и карточные столы создают атмосферу праздника и богатства. Однако за красивой витриной часто скрывается серьезная проблема — лудомания. Лудомания, или игровая зависимость, — это болезненное пристрастие к азартн

👍1

Signed если проиграю, админ пидорас

27 Apr 2025, 00:24 UTC310 viewsread 12 August 2026

Запомните главное - вы никогда не избавитесь от зависимости, вы сами не замечаете, как заменяете одно обыденное дело - другим.

Signed

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @openseyes. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

21 Apr 2025, 12:15 UTCAnonymous Poll30 voters

Вам нравится контент данного канала?

  1. Да63%
  2. Нет, скукота37%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 21 April 2025 to 17 May 2025. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,215,996 of 1,478,351entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Открытые глаза” (@openseyes), 1,131 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/openseyes.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.