🌟🪄🪄🪄🪄🪄🪄🪄🪄 вот так смотришь иногда на Эмиля и думаешь милый мальчик, а потом вспоминаешь, что ему больше 30ти лет, его пиздят в подвале и он больше не может ходить 🤩
🥰7custom 52378659306246050105🍓3

Channel
@oparisish
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
196subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002050773535 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @oparisish |
| Description | кровь мяса кишки убивства |
| Created | Between 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 8 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/oparisish |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 8 Aug 2026, 11:45 | 196 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 14:32 | 196 | first reading |
16 posts held, back to 18 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 16 (18 July 2026 – 6 August 2026) |
| Views total | 1,289 |
| Reactions total | 254 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 8 Aug 2026, 11:45 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
254 reactions across 16 posts, in 12 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 29.1% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5237865930624605010 | 74 | 29.1% | |
| 🥰 | 40 | 15.7% | |
| ❤ | 31 | 12.2% | |
| 🔥 | 31 | 12.2% | |
| ❤🔥 | 30 | 11.8% | |
| 🍌 | 10 | 3.94% | |
| 💋 | 8 | 3.15% | |
| ✍ | 7 | 2.76% | |
| 🍓 | 6 | 2.36% | |
| 💅 | 6 | 2.36% | |
| 😭 | 6 | 2.36% | |
| 🤩 | 5 | 1.97% |
Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it isTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 16 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 254reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 18 July 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
🌟🪄🪄🪄🪄🪄🪄🪄🪄 вот так смотришь иногда на Эмиля и думаешь милый мальчик, а потом вспоминаешь, что ему больше 30ти лет, его пиздят в подвале и он больше не может ходить 🤩
🥰7custom 52378659306246050105🍓3
🥺 кстати для тех кто ждёт Садофазер когда я писала, что он продолжит выходить, я имела ввиду, что я гармонично вписала его в сюжет ФБ. и забавное, что мне чтобы рассказать весь сюжет ФБ от начала и до нынешних событий в сеттинге, надо отрисовать Садофазер, потому что там половина сюжета ФБ на нём повязано и да, не спрашивайте как я смогла связать фурри и русреал, в самом Садофазере фурри не будет, но имейте ввиду, …
😭6🔥2
Posted without readable text
❤🔥7💋5custom 52378659306246050105
✨✨✨🥰✨✨✨ ✨✨✨🥰✨🥰 🤍🤍🤍🤍 вот вы спите и даже не знаете где Йохан живёт, не стыдно?
custom 52378659306246050108✍5💅3
😯 хочу нормально описать свой лор, чтобы еще и иностранцы моими ебейшими фурри персами прониклись, и вам чтобы было проще разобраться вопрос теперь такой - как мне САМОЙ В ЭТОМ РАЗОБРАТЬСЯ АЗАХАЗХАЗВХ Я УЖЕ ВСЁ ЗАБЫЛА, А ЭТА ХРОНОЛОГИЯ СЕЙЧАС ЧАСТИЧНО НЕВЕРНАЯ, УГАР
❤6🍌5custom 52378659306246050104
🥰✨✨✨🥰✨✨ а это шикарный мужчина для CODEoGAWA - - - немного не успеваю атаковать всех кого хочу, но главное что атаковала друзей из аска 🤗 #artfight2026
custom 523786593062460501010🔥8🥰7❤3
🥰✨✨✨🥰✨✨ это моя мстя для @notsofunnygoatdraws ❤️ - - - а вообще это уже шестая атака между прочим, просто остальные фурри и они в другом тгк. стараюсь наверстать упущенное так сказат 😡 #artfight2026
custom 52378659306246050109❤🔥8❤6✍2🥰1
🌟✨ ладно покажу вам накаченного Васю 🌟 еще и постригся, че наделал, жесть
custom 523786593062460501010🔥6🍌5
👀👀👀👀👀👀 👀🤍👀👀👀 💗💗💗💗 🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟 принимаем всех, кто не равнодушен к творческой деятельности: художники, аниматоры, 3д-художники, хэнд-мейды и многие другие! 🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟 Обязательные условия: 👤 подписка на МЕТА шоп ➡️ репост данного поста в свой тгк 📝 отправить анкету по шаблону: [🖼примеры работ] 1. ваш лс 2. ссылка на тгк 3. что собираетесь продавать? (адопты/ючи/ручн изделия/итп) ❗️ важно! • просим не кидать анкету повт…
custom 52378659306246050101
🥰✨✨✨🥰✨✨ 🥴 ну и наконец моя первая атака на артфайте, а то уже половина июля прошла 💗🩵🧡 милаха для [милахи] 😟
❤🔥9🥰5custom 52378659306246050104💋3
Posted without readable text
custom 52378659306246050106❤🔥4🥰4
🤩 😀😀😀😀😀 😀😀😀😀😀😀🤩 второй мой план заработка это витуб модели, к сожалению за модельку на видео мне также не заплатят, это для портфолио 🤩 у меня практически четыре модели уже, но ни одного нормального шоукейса, спидраню этот момент до конца июля🤩
❤6🥰6🔥5custom 52378659306246050102
Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @oparisish. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 496,719 of 1,189,255entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“шаурма с опарышами” (@oparisish), 196 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/oparisish.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.