Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

🇹🇼台灣外送茶南部班表

@op6676

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

835subscribers

+1 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003762367901
TypeChannel
Username@op6676
CreatedBetween 1 February 2026 and 30 June 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live7 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 7 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/op6676

Growth

834835834.56 Aug 2026, 19:51 — 834 subscribers6 Aug 2026, 20:03 — 834 subscribers7 Aug 2026, 05:35 — 835 subscribers6 Aug 2026, 19:517 Aug 2026, 05:35
3 measurements taken within a single day, net +1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 834–835 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
7 Aug 2026, 05:35835+1
6 Aug 2026, 20:03834no change
6 Aug 2026, 19:51834first reading

Engagement

15 posts held, back to 5 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
0.495%
avg views ÷ 835 subscribers
Avg views / post
4.1
15 posts measured
Reaction rate
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
15
of 15 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026
Posts held15 (5 August 20266 August 2026)
Views total62
Reactions total
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken6 Aug 2026, 20:03 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Recent posts

6 Aug 2026, 16:48 UTC3 viewsread 6 August 2026

https://gleezyop888.pixnet.net/blog/posts/926144010991582424

6 Aug 2026, 11:15 UTC3 viewsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @optx666Photo

真不找我約妹嗎? 真不找我,我就出家去了唷xd 哈哈哈哈哈🤣

6 Aug 2026, 07:29 UTC3 viewsread 6 August 2026
Photo

一通電話送好茶 O泡讓你爽到麻💗 小靜 168cm.D奶.48kg.27歲 冷艶健身教練 外貌可口身材更誘人 喜歡愛愛的快感 深深被吸引 著迷 刺激的性愛 玩的恥度很大 很騷很好配合 🔥・✧ ─ ⋆⋅聯絡方式⋅⋆ ─✧ ・🔥 📱官方論壇: https://www.twtea168.com/ 📱O泡 Telegram: @yoy253 ⭐O泡Gleezy:op888 🌈Gleezy喝茶頻道: https://c.gleezy.top/QKPR9RWj

6 Aug 2026, 07:27 UTC4 viewsread 6 August 2026
Photo

一通電話送好茶 O泡讓你爽到麻💗 佳琪琪 161cm 45kg C杯 23歲 學生 溫婉甜美 五官精緻 學識淵博 滿溢知性能量 🔥・✧ ─ ⋆⋅聯絡方式⋅⋆ ─✧ ・🔥 📱官方論壇: https://www.twtea168.com/ 📱O泡 Telegram: @yoy253 ⭐O泡Gleezy:op888 🌈Gleezy喝茶頻道: https://c.gleezy.top/QKPR9RWj

6 Aug 2026, 07:27 UTC4 viewsread 6 August 2026
Photo

一通電話送好茶 O泡讓你爽到麻💗 佳佳 166cm 46kg D杯 26歲 商務空姐 隨性灑脫 五官深邃 處事從容 滿溢專業氣場 🔥・✧ ─ ⋆⋅聯絡方式⋅⋆ ─✧ ・🔥 📱官方論壇: https://www.twtea168.com/ 📱O泡 Telegram: @yoy253 ⭐O泡Gleezy:op888 🌈Gleezy喝茶頻道: https://c.gleezy.top/QKPR9RWj

6 Aug 2026, 05:17 UTC3 viewsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @optx666

全宇宙最可愛的O泡妹妹上線了~~✌

5 Aug 2026, 20:01 UTC4 viewsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @gleezyop888Sticker

Sticker, posted without a caption

5 Aug 2026, 20:01 UTC4 viewsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @gleezyop888

星星在夜空排隊,是在等你說晚安 然後一起進入甜甜的夢鄉吖~🤗

5 Aug 2026, 10:18 UTC5 viewsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @optx666Photo

笑死我了哈哈哈 沒有條件 我就創造條件xd 結果下面這個人跟著我哈哈哈笑死我啦🤣

5 Aug 2026, 07:57 UTC5 viewsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @gleezyop888Photo

笑死我了哈哈哈哈xd 什麼叫女人心海底針哈哈哈哈哈哈哈😂 我這點小心思有這麼難猜嗎,不就是想你們性福嗎😭😭

5 Aug 2026, 07:13 UTC5 viewsread 6 August 2026
Photo

一通電話送好茶 O泡讓你爽到麻💗 #可愛萌妹 158cm-44kg-Ccup-21歲 雙馬尾運動風 白嫩膚質清純可愛 身材纖細卻藏著渾圓曲線 互動時青澀乖巧 床上慢慢展現小騷勁 給你戀愛般的甜美體驗 🔥・✧ ─ ⋆⋅聯絡方式⋅⋆ ─✧ ・🔥 📱官方論壇: https://www.twtea168.com/ 📱O泡 Telegram: @yoy253 ⭐O泡Gleezy:op888 🌈Gleezy喝茶頻道: https://c.gleezy.top/QKPR9RWj

Showing the 12 most recent of 15 posts we hold for @op6676. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 91,379 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“🇹🇼台灣外送茶南部班表” (@op6676), 835 subscribers as measured 7 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/op6676.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.