Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for day trading | onwardbtc

Channel

day trading | onwardbtc

@onwardbtcdaytrading

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

46subscribers

-1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001235348005
TypeChannel
Username@onwardbtcdaytrading
CreatedBetween 1 March 2018 and 30 June 2019 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded10 August 2026
Last confirmed live4 September 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged4 times, most recently 4 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/onwardbtcdaytrading

Growth

464746.57 August 2026 — 47 subscribers10 August 2026 — 47 subscribers15 August 2026 — 46 subscribers7 August 202615 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 7 days, net -1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 46–47 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
15 Aug 2026, 01:1546-1
10 Aug 2026, 13:3147no change
7 Aug 2026, 22:5047first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 30 June 2019the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 2 November 2019. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Recent posts

2 Nov 2019, 20:01 UTC≈1,750 viewsread 10 August 2026

Hey guys 😊 For all that were in here, we do the same on our public channel from now on. So if you liked it, please join: https://t.me/onwardbtc_official

30 Jun 2019, 22:33 UTC≈1,640 viewsread 10 August 2026

This channel will be inactive for the public. We move everything during the next hours for VIP only. I hope you all understand that. Our VIPs trust us and we will do our best to get some good trades for them. It was really funny and yeah, we are a team of trader on onwardbtc but I had the chance to lead this channel during the last weeks. I met some really nice persons, heared a lot of sad stories but also some epic

30 Jun 2019, 22:11 UTC859 viewsread 10 August 2026

CME Futures started trading some minutes ago and leaving a gap to up to 12250 open. Keep that in mind for the future. It hasn't filled right now or next day, but at some point it mostly will

30 Jun 2019, 18:27 UTC731 viewsread 10 August 2026

I will come back and do some final words before I close the channel. Set it inactive. So this wasn't the end 😊 Lifetime still 50% Discount today. So if you liked it and want to join, welcome :) 0.05 BTC to 1KuS1syAfEuNvaDufAc9S6w2vXTVeQ5L7D Contact admin: @onwardbtc with transaction-id and he will add you to the channels.

30 Jun 2019, 18:26 UTC654 viewsread 10 August 2026

For those who don't join our group: Please never risk too much. It is your crypto and your money. I personal do it like this: I want to open a position and I think: This money will get liquidated. Will it hurt me? If it hurts you, you risked too much, if not, you are right! Perfect. Just don't try to catch the perfect trade where you catch the bottom and sell at the top. NOBODY can do this. Catch the wave and ride it

30 Jun 2019, 18:22 UTC553 viewsread 10 August 2026

The Monthly on Bitcoin. Looks bullish here but here also. No white (red) candels since February and a massive spike. A spike we had at all time high.

30 Jun 2019, 18:21 UTC497 viewsread 10 August 2026

The problem for me right now is, that we didn't build up support levels on the way up. We went parabolic and formed nearly no support at the way up. The same happens when we hit 20k and we all know what happend after that. When you charting and want to go long and you have no support structure at the past time, why you should go long? We have a support at 8-9k now but it isn't huge. For me the only support is down be

30 Jun 2019, 18:19 UTC467 viewsread 10 August 2026

Weekly on BTC. Looks not that great right now. A huge spike to the upside. Rejection on the 0.618 Fib level. I'm not sure about the bullrun. I leaning more bearish here. Also check the green candles. Since February we had only 2 "bearish" weeks where price went down. At some point it has to bearth/retrace.

30 Jun 2019, 18:17 UTC418 viewsread 10 August 2026

CME Future: In some hours CME Futures start trading again and they will start lower. It stopped at 12510. So we will have a gap to fill above us but just remember that there are 2 gaps under current price: 10500-10000 and 9000-8500. Just keep that in mind. As I said, they don't get filled imidiatly. I can take days, weeks etc. Just check them every Sunday evening when they start trading.

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @onwardbtcdaytrading. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“day trading | onwardbtc” (@onwardbtcdaytrading), 46 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/onwardbtcdaytrading.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.